-
AFLW 2024 - Round 8 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Rounds 9 & 10 - Trades
- Thread starter IDIG
- Start date
- Tagged users None
- Status
Itsblackandwhite
Senior List
Re: Round 9 - Trades
Not keen on didak ? I like the look of didak this year...him or harvey...cant really go wrong...
Re: Round 9 - Trades
Thinking of making exactly the same trades (except trading Silvagni instead of Nason). Should be some nice midfield bargains next week to look at with all that loot.
Am considering those two myself for my second team. Am leaning towards Boomer.
Although the other guy i'm seriously considering is Leon Davis. Is a big risk given his current form, but surely must improve, and at $381k he is very tempting. Would leave you with some valuable coin left over.
Thinking of making exactly the same trades (except trading Silvagni instead of Nason). Should be some nice midfield bargains next week to look at with all that loot.
Am considering those two myself for my second team. Am leaning towards Boomer.
Although the other guy i'm seriously considering is Leon Davis. Is a big risk given his current form, but surely must improve, and at $381k he is very tempting. Would leave you with some valuable coin left over.
Re: Round 9 - Trades
Im not too sure on what to here guys, so some little help and advice may help me decide.
I currently have $259,500 in the bank.
Option one:
Trade Vince to premium mid like swan or judd
or
Trade Tippett into Cox or Kruz.
which one would you suggest?
Im not too sure on what to here guys, so some little help and advice may help me decide.
I currently have $259,500 in the bank.
Option one:
Trade Vince to premium mid like swan or judd
or
Trade Tippett into Cox or Kruz.
which one would you suggest?
Re: Round 9 - Trades
In the same boat here. Forced to make the trade because of Higgins & Relton also in the team, just pulled the trigger and went Murphy to Goodes. Reckon he is about to take off in the 2nd half of the season.
In the same boat here. Forced to make the trade because of Higgins & Relton also in the team, just pulled the trigger and went Murphy to Goodes. Reckon he is about to take off in the 2nd half of the season.
AFLROCKS
Senior List
Re: Round 9 - Trades
I'm leaning towards
Bastinac -> Armstrong (Bench)
Waters -> Goddard
any comments?
I'm leaning towards
Bastinac -> Armstrong (Bench)
Waters -> Goddard
any comments?
Re: Round 9 - Trades
Do it! Although saying that im not sure about Armstrong's JS...?
Do it! Although saying that im not sure about Armstrong's JS...?
Re: Round 9 - Trades
Waters to Goddard is certainly a great trade. I can't really comment on Armstrong though... haven't seen him play. But it frees up a lot of cash!
I'm thinking:
Waters -> Shepphard/Webberley
Bastinac -> Mitchell
Is Sheppard worth the extra 55k? Would he have better JS then Webberley?
If I go to Webberley I could than do a midfield - Martin -> Swan!
Waters to Goddard is certainly a great trade. I can't really comment on Armstrong though... haven't seen him play. But it frees up a lot of cash!
I'm thinking:
Waters -> Shepphard/Webberley
Bastinac -> Mitchell
Is Sheppard worth the extra 55k? Would he have better JS then Webberley?
If I go to Webberley I could than do a midfield - Martin -> Swan!
Re: Round 9 - Trades
I'm in the same boat except I want to get rid of Medhurst.
Looking at Silvagni to Webberley then:
Medurst to Davis ($381K - BE 71), Goodes ($414K - BE 124), or O'Keefe ($468K - BE 188)
Thinking Davis can't get any worse and then Goodes in next week. Any other options?
I'm in the same boat except I want to get rid of Medhurst.
Looking at Silvagni to Webberley then:
Medurst to Davis ($381K - BE 71), Goodes ($414K - BE 124), or O'Keefe ($468K - BE 188)
Thinking Davis can't get any worse and then Goodes in next week. Any other options?
BOMBERBLITZ
Premiership Player
Re: Round 9 - Trades
No trades this week. (15 left)
Next week:
Martin -> Goodes
Barlow -> Montagna
No trades this week. (15 left)
Next week:
Martin -> Goodes
Barlow -> Montagna
cooney_cougs
Debutant
Re: Round 9 - Trades
my dilemma is whether to trade waters or silvagni out for webberley this week considering i'll prob upgrade the other for gilbert or duffield next week.
who is more likely to make breakeven WATERS: 78 or SILVAGNI: 53
you'd think silvagni but him playing chb worries me.
my dilemma is whether to trade waters or silvagni out for webberley this week considering i'll prob upgrade the other for gilbert or duffield next week.
who is more likely to make breakeven WATERS: 78 or SILVAGNI: 53
you'd think silvagni but him playing chb worries me.
Re: Round 9 - Trades
Why Barlow? Surely you have other "problems" bigger than him. They are averaging about the same. And why take up a midfield spot with Goodes? Put him up forward.
If I was you I would just go Martin-Montagna and I would do it this week.
Why Barlow? Surely you have other "problems" bigger than him. They are averaging about the same. And why take up a midfield spot with Goodes? Put him up forward.
If I was you I would just go Martin-Montagna and I would do it this week.
rocker_oz33
TheBrownDog
Re: Round 9 - Trades
yeah l hear ya.with waters going forward his scores have not been as good but silvagni in a young first year player who will have to step up with McFarland going down.it looks like they both will get a game every week for some time tough call l would keep waters just
yeah l hear ya.with waters going forward his scores have not been as good but silvagni in a young first year player who will have to step up with McFarland going down.it looks like they both will get a game every week for some time tough call l would keep waters just
AssassinAndy
All Australian
Re: Round 9 - Trades
Seriously? Have I missed something? Not sure why you would want to do that trade at this stage of the year when Barlow is scoring just as well as Montagna.
Seriously? Have I missed something? Not sure why you would want to do that trade at this stage of the year when Barlow is scoring just as well as Montagna.
Re: Round 9 - Trades
I wouldn't do that this week as Martin B/E = 73 & should go close to it so his price shouldn't move much and Montagna B/E = 156 should go down in price unless he has a blinder
Re: Round 9 - Trades
If I was in that position i'd probably do the trade this week and pocket the extra points.
But I guess it then depends on whether you think saving an extra 20k is worth the points lost by not having Montagna this week and playing Martin instead.I wouldn't do that this week as Martin B/E = 73 & should go close to it so his price shouldn't move much and Montagna B/E = 156 should go down in price unless he has a blinder
If I was in that position i'd probably do the trade this week and pocket the extra points.
Re: Round 9 - Trades
My backline - Goddard , Hodge , Enright , Malceski , Kennelly , Waters , Hooker (emg. Nason & Silvingi)
With Hooker going down & my bank balance of 118k I have got $471,700 to spend on a backman if I use only 1 trade. Who would you suggest??
My backline - Goddard , Hodge , Enright , Malceski , Kennelly , Waters , Hooker (emg. Nason & Silvingi)
With Hooker going down & my bank balance of 118k I have got $471,700 to spend on a backman if I use only 1 trade. Who would you suggest??
- Apr 20, 2001
- 27,507
- 10,624
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Adelaide Utd,Liverpool, WWT Eagles.
Re: Round 9 - Trades
Finally fed up with Vince and Winderlich
This week have gone
Nason to Webberley and Vince to Bartel
Next Week
Gumbleton to Watts and Winderlich to Montagna.
Updrading my expected keepers instead of rookies is not good but I can only take so much.
Finally fed up with Vince and Winderlich
This week have gone
Nason to Webberley and Vince to Bartel
Next Week
Gumbleton to Watts and Winderlich to Montagna.
Updrading my expected keepers instead of rookies is not good but I can only take so much.
Re: Round 9 - Trades
I'd suggest you trade Nason or Soss for Webberly, giving you $280k in your Cap, then you can get whoever you want for Hooker plus some change for your next trade.
Gilbee's probably the #1 option, followed by
2. Hurn
3. Grundy
4. Grimes
5. Russell
6. Duffield
7. Shaw
8. Lake
9. Johncock
But that's just my opinion.
I'd suggest you trade Nason or Soss for Webberly, giving you $280k in your Cap, then you can get whoever you want for Hooker plus some change for your next trade.
Gilbee's probably the #1 option, followed by
2. Hurn
3. Grundy
4. Grimes
5. Russell
6. Duffield
7. Shaw
8. Lake
9. Johncock
But that's just my opinion.
dontaskfev
Senior List
Re: Round 9 - Trades
trades left: 13(2)
$4,500
backs: Goddard, Enright, Hodge, Malceski, Waters, Hunt, Maguire
(silvagni, Davis)
Mids: Ablett(C), NDS, Cooney, Selwood, Barlow, Martin
(Moles, Shuey)
Rucks: Sandilands, Hille
(roughead, Skipper)
Forwards: Chapman, Pavlich, Brown, O'keefe, Pods, Franklin, Rockliff
(Medhurst, Hitchcock)
what are your thoughts on ..
silvagni>webberly then Hunt> H.Shaw???
or other there better options for my side
trades left: 13(2)
$4,500
backs: Goddard, Enright, Hodge, Malceski, Waters, Hunt, Maguire
(silvagni, Davis)
Mids: Ablett(C), NDS, Cooney, Selwood, Barlow, Martin
(Moles, Shuey)
Rucks: Sandilands, Hille
(roughead, Skipper)
Forwards: Chapman, Pavlich, Brown, O'keefe, Pods, Franklin, Rockliff
(Medhurst, Hitchcock)
what are your thoughts on ..
silvagni>webberly then Hunt> H.Shaw???
or other there better options for my side
dontaskfev
Senior List
Re: Round 9 - Trades
yes good point although, Shaw has the potential to score big really big
yes good point although, Shaw has the potential to score big really big
- Status
Similar threads
