I have a bad feeling and I hope that I am wrong....But Nyhuis has agreed to 3, the AFL has agreed to 3...I think they will say 4
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
If both parties suggest 3 I can't imagine he would get more.I have a bad feeling and I hope that I am wrong....But Nyhuis has agreed to 3, the AFL has agreed to 3...I think they will say 4
You just never know !!If both parties suggest 3 I can't imagine he would get more.
To me it suggests that Freo are not well prepared or don't want the back lash in trying to defend it.
I thought that 2 would be appropriate.
If both parties suggest 3 I can't imagine he would get more.
To me it suggests that Freo are not well prepared or don't want the back lash in trying to defend it.
I thought that 2 would be appropriate.
Unless it is BuddyAt least it's not something insane like 4 or 5 weeks like idiots in the media were calling for.
That said, 3 is an escalation on what we've seen and puts players on notice that it's going to be stamped on.
Right call. Justice has been served. 3 weeks fits the crime.
More like 2 too many. What a joke.3 matches...Phew.
may be one to many.
If say Dangerfield done it in r22 on the eve of the finals you really think he will get 3 weeks?I have no probs with this, as long as the tribunal is consistent.
A baseline has been set, next similar incident = 3 weeks.
You realise I was exaggerating, don’t you?Not sure there are many “if any” doctors working at a club or in general practice prepared to say “he nearly died or needs a head reconstruction” and then allow the player to play the following week. Massive over-reach. I have no doubt the club doctor will say he was knocked out and prior to playing again (and in line with AFL rules) will need to go through all necessary tests. I personally believe the likely-hood of him playing this weekend would be zero.
I have no probs with this, as long as the tribunal is consistent.
A baseline has been set, next similar incident = 3 weeks.
If say Dangerfield done it in r22 on the eve of the finals you really think he will get 3 weeks?
What do you expect from Port - they did the same thing when Nic Nat was up on report earlier in the year when he got a week. Ports medical team are inclined to exaggerate the situation a bit! Think Nyhuis definitely deserved 2 weeks but perhaps 3 was too many.Still waiting on our “massive form” for doing this?
This is one live incident. Can you please provide others to support your claim?
You idiot.More like 2 too many. What a joke.
What a ******* joke, Cameron gets 5 for putting a bloke out for the rest of the season, and Nyhuis gets 3 and Gray might play this week
And they wonder why people are so disillusioned
Like I care what a dumbarse like you thinks. If it was Danger you would reckon it was worth a 1k fine.You idiot.
That isn't a 1 weeker.