Opinion Sack Hinkley 11 - Gentlemen, this is democracy manifest

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.

Log in to remove this ad.

An open letter to the club from supporters, that gets media coverage, would do well. Be able to canvas every issue we have, with Richo, Koch, Ken, the hypocrisy in the media, the throwing players under the bus etc. 20k signatures to boot.



On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
Staged walk out at the next home game 12 minutes into the first quarter, one minute for each year of his tenure.
 
C4[2]Yo`DooR Can you please tell us how a decision to continue with Hinkley came about when Tredrea was on radio at 6pm last night? Wouldn't that be reason to spill a board if a meeting was held with out all Directors being notified?

Koch probably just made an informal roll call and counted the votes.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

That was racist? F**ken hell pull the other one. Who gives a shit!?
Again, imagine if Ken did something similar to an Aboriginal custom? Imagine if he flippantly tosses some sort of relic or meal over his shoulder?

Sent from my Nokia 7.2 using Tapatalk
 
I know we all wanted it but realistically it just doesn’t happen mid season when you are still in the finals mix. If this has happened before I’d be interested to know when?


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

But my question is why can't it happen and Ken be moved on? Keeping the Coach and giving him a contract extension before finals worked a treat for us last year. Why cant we just say we got it wrong, it was a mistake and move on now? Regardless of whether finals are a possibility.

And I know some people will say as you have "Well clubs don't move on coaches when the finals are still in reach" That may very well be true historically, but historically clubs also don't give a Senior Coach without a GF appearance in his 11th season his fourth contract extension to take him into season 12 &13. These are unique circumstances we have never seen before in Competition history.
 
Again, imagine if Ken did something similar to an Aboriginal custom? Imagine if he flippantly tosses some sort of relic or meal over his shoulder?

Sent from my Nokia 7.2 using Tapatalk
(Imagines it) okay I can see people taking offense to that. But he didn't do that. He just threw out some tea as an unfunny/cringe gag. Nobody cares. Sack him for being not funny.
 
When Cornes family comes out in force defending Hinkley you know change must happen quickly


View attachment 2028999
Imagine the sentiment from Crows fans if Timmy G were to say publicly, "Matty Nicks will know when it's his time. Crows fans need to exercise a bit of patience here."
 
The club has clearly gone full Pyongyang and is denigrating/scraping at any and everything to deflect blame from what they have allowed to become more toxic than B.Spears in '03.

Wilson's hit piece on Classified of WGT, Slobbo doubling down on 360 and the puppets having the clubs hand inserted the highest it has been into the derriere's (Cornes x 2, Dwayno, Whateley et al.) to the point of having the lesser Matthew Richardson call in to AA to question what is essentially his boss and his motives for what has been said.

These absolute charlatans masquerading as 'footy people' in MY CLUB, bringing it down so they can cling on to their empire and stuff their pockets. The propaganda and gaslighting that has come direct from the club would put the Third Reich to shame, yet we are just expected to shutup and chow down on the shit sandwich because Nick Reiwoldt thinks Hinkley has done ok with the players he has had over the journey? Spare me.
Seriously considering a 'Ken for Pyongyang' banner if he is still coaching when we play up here in a few weeks
 
C4[2]Yo`DooR Can you please tell us how a decision to continue with Hinkley came about when Tredrea was on radio at 6pm last night? Wouldn't that be reason to spill a board if a meeting was held with out all Directors being notified?
To be fair I read C4's "6pm" comment more as that was when C4 talked to their source and got the most up to date information.

But if there was a board meeting of some sort and they purposefully didn't include the one member that is supposed to be a voice of the members. Boy oh boy
 
To be fair I read C4's "6pm" comment more as that was when C4 talked to their source and got the most up to date information.

But if there was a board meeting of some sort and they purposefully didn't include the one member that is supposed to be a voice of the members. Boy oh boy
Not sure. I'm hoping he/she will shed some light........... C4[2]Yo`DooR
 
Mark Bickley discusses the unrest among Port Adelaide fans


View attachment 2030419
Wow, an objective overview of the whole situation. No attacking, no defending, no denigrating, no exaltations and no petty name calling.

I didn't think that was allowed in AFL media circles.
 
It’s been a long endgame. Covid helped stretching it. The longer it goes, the worse to all involved. Yet, here we are.

I want to check my posting History on Hinkley, Koch, Davies, etc. I want to see when I changed my opinion on them, how, and why.
There was a thread about 7 or 8 years ago that was about the 3 K's having run their race!

Good Call? ;)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top