It doesn't. Moot point for the unintelligent.Mark Williams = 1 premiership in 6 years
Ken Hinkley = (hypothetically) 1 premiership in 12 (twice as many) years
How on earth does that make Hinkley Williams' equal (even hypothetically)?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 3 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
It doesn't. Moot point for the unintelligent.Mark Williams = 1 premiership in 6 years
Ken Hinkley = (hypothetically) 1 premiership in 12 (twice as many) years
How on earth does that make Hinkley Williams' equal (even hypothetically)?
I wonder if you, or any of the other dissenters, were one of the ones baying for his blood in 2010, very similar to the current situation. There was certainly a very loud chorus that I remember.It doesn't. Moot point for the unintelligent.
And that is a huge hypothetical. Could be more than likely be 0 after 12 seasons. Hinkley is the narcissistMark Williams = 1 premiership in 6 years
Ken Hinkley = (hypothetically) 1 premiership in 12 (twice as many) years
How on earth does that make Hinkley Williams' equal (even hypothetically)?
My goodness, you truly are an empty vessel now aren’t you.I wonder if you, or any of the other dissenters, were one of the ones baying for his blood in 2010, very similar to the current situation. There was certainly a very loud chorus that I remember.
Interesting comment. Must have touched a raw nerve perhaps.My goodness, you truly are an empty vessel now aren’t you.
How’s this for basic - if Ken was Williams' equal and was able to achieve 1 premiership in 6 years, then basically Ken would be able to achieve 2 premierships in 12 years.Try that. Basic maths.
Not bad. Can't argue with that unless he goes back to back next year.How’s this for basic - if Ken was Williams' equal and was able to achieve 1 premiership in 6 years, then basically Ken would be able to achieve 2 premierships in 12 years.
Pal if you haven’t noticed this thread is basically for people that want Ken gone.An empty vessel??
Interesting comment. Must have touched a raw nerve perhaps.
Okay.
So long as you're prepared to acknowledge that if you win it this year, that makes Hinkley his equal in terms of premierships won per years served as coach on the national stage.
That seems to be the crux of the argument.
Not wanting to stir anything, was actually intending to contribute an opinion and enjoy some measured discussion whilst we have a break in the match schedule.Pal if you haven’t noticed this thread is basically for people that want Ken gone.
You don’t sound that stupid so I can’t understand why you’re flogging a dead horse.
If you’re board and want to stir up some shit I get that.
If you think for one minute your going to get your point across in here your delusional.
Best to let it go and move along.
Okay.
So long as you're prepared to acknowledge that if you win it this year, that makes Hinkley his equal in terms of premierships won per years served as coach on the national stage.
That seems to be the crux of the argument.
Old mate Kenny’s cheer squad now throwing “back to back” into the equation?
We are definitely through the looking glass.
You’re still not getting it, I’ll repeat it.Not wanting to stir anything, was actually intending to contribute an opinion and enjoy some measured discussion whilst we have a break in the match schedule.
There's obviously a misconception that I am defending Hinkley. I'm not. I totally agree he has underachieved and you are right to be questioning his right to be still in the coaching job. At the end of the day I don't give a rats arse if he goes or stays.
What I don't get is the amount of love for a coach who had the same number of years in the job and fluffed as many chances to win flags as well as making you guys a national laughing stock. The fact he managed to finally get it right and win one - or fluke one against a battered and bruised opponent - depending on your opinion - is the only thing that sets them apart in my view.
Nothing more than that. If you want to take that as stirring it up, well, that's your prerogative.
There is a major issue here though.Not wanting to stir anything, was actually intending to contribute an opinion and enjoy some measured discussion whilst we have a break in the match schedule.
There's obviously a misconception that I am defending Hinkley. I'm not. I totally agree he has underachieved and you are right to be questioning his right to be still in the coaching job. At the end of the day I don't give a rats arse if he goes or stays.
What I don't get is the amount of love for a coach who had the same number of years in the job and fluffed as many chances to win flags as well as making you guys a national laughing stock. The fact he managed to finally get it right and win one - or fluke one against a battered and bruised opponent - depending on your opinion - is the only thing that sets them apart in my view.
Nothing more than that. If you want to take that as stirring it up, well, that's your prerogative.
Maybe you should consult a dictionary and look up the meaning of ' respect ' . Keep your smartarse remarks to yourself.lighthouse end instead of wasting our time you should Google how to use a computer so you can edit your bigfooty profile like a big boy
Fair point.You’re still not getting it, I’ll repeat it.
This thread is for people that have had enough of Ken and want him out.
No matter what you say logically or not it makes no difference.
Nobody’s interested in your contribution, they have had a gut full of Hinkley and want him gone.
It really is that simple, unless you want to go along with that you’re wasting your time here.
Your basic logic is flawed.Sorry , but I'm not aware of any post where I have lauded Hinkley either, merely mentioned a premiership at a Tier 1 AFL Barwon club which I have been advised is irrelevant in this discussion and I have accepted that.
I have simply made a comparison between his coaching performance over the journey as being - in my opinion - no worse than a previous coach who served for the same number of seasons for minimal success but who - again in my opinion - had many more weapons in his arsenal but failed to use them correctly to bring the success you should have had.
Not sure how your logic works, but in my logic that doesn't equate to lauding Hinkley. Nor does it equate to hating Williams, it is merely a football opinion. Which I am happy to debate when things are kept in perspective.
This is the sack Hinkley thread. Anything less than a sack Hinkley or equivalent may as well be a glowing endorsement.Sorry , but I'm not aware of any post where I have lauded Hinkley either, merely mentioned a premiership at a Tier 1 AFL Barwon club which I have been advised is irrelevant in this discussion and I have accepted that.
I have simply made a comparison between his coaching performance over the journey as being - in my opinion - no worse than a previous coach who served for the same number of seasons for minimal success but who - again in my opinion - had many more weapons in his arsenal but failed to use them correctly to bring the success you should have had.
Not sure how your logic works, but in my logic that doesn't equate to lauding Hinkley. Nor does it equate to hating Williams, it is merely a football opinion. Which I am happy to debate when things are kept in perspective.
If you say so. It's people like you perpetuating the dispute. I've said several times I'm not defending Hinkley, merely making a comparison. If you don't know the difference, that isn't my issue.
240volt said:Your basic logic is flawed.
Ken Hinkley 12 seasons - made a couple of Preliminary Final
Mark Williams - 10 seasons - win a Grand Final, lose a Grand Final, made many Preliminary Finals.
I am unsure if I've got everything correct.
In your opinion, how is that similar?