UcantCme
Premiership Player
- Mar 3, 2021
- 3,912
- 5,794
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
Melbourne board stating he clashed with Burgess.
Burgo had McAdam rated as a top 10 talent at the club but wanted him to work harder
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Sydney v Port Adelaide - 7:40 / 7:10 Fri
Squiggle tips Swans at 57% chance -- What's your tip? -- Teams on Thurs »
LIVE: Geelong v Brisbane Lions - 7:30PM Sat
Squiggle tips Cats at 54% chance -- What's your tip? -- Teams on Thurs »
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Prelim Finals
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
AFLW 2024 - Round 4 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Melbourne board stating he clashed with Burgess.
Requiring people to pass fitness benchmarks before they can come back into the 1's is bad selection policy??This is what happens when the club implements a stupid selection policy over a season.
Well when the player is still capable of more compared with some others getting a game when not fit?Requiring people to pass fitness benchmarks before they can come back into the 1's is bad selection policy??
Keep murphy and sloane..
And lose mcadam.
Putrid list management.
The club needs another broom through it.
He's a bad loss and I rate him, but I don't think offering 2 years instead of 3 is wrong.
Collingwood.Ruccci has clarified saying it was a Melbourne based club….
Sent from my iPad using BigFooty.com
How do you know that?This is bit of a ridiculous post
Keeping Sloane and Murphy had no bearing on losing McAdam
McAdam was waving regardless
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
Weird club to choose if he doesn't like Burgess. Chances are Melbourne are still influenced by his time there.
“Hey Shane.. you want more money?… yeah, no worries mate, sloane is retiring this year and we’re gonna move that absolute hack in Murphy on aswell… we’ll be able to throw some of the money we save from those departures at your new contract”…This is bit of a ridiculous post
Keeping Sloane and Murphy had no bearing on losing McAdam
McAdam was waving regardless
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
“Hey Shane.. you want more money?… yeah, no worries mate, sloane is retiring this year and we’re gonna move that absolute hack in Murphy on aswell… we’ll be able to throw some of the money we save from those departures at your new contract”…
Money talks.
Hasnt been confirmed its the dees yet…Interesting that a former club that Burgess helped with a flag in the back of their ability to run over sides would take McAdam who would not buy-in to Burgess training requirements
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
Didn't we missed out on 2 big fish so would have been able to offer McAdams $200K more ($700K instead of likely $500K) if that's what you are implying.......???“Hey Shane.. you want more money?… yeah, no worries mate, sloane is retiring this year and we’re gonna move that absolute hack in Murphy on aswell… we’ll be able to throw some of the money we save from those departures at your new contract”…
Money talks.
Remember though, Nicks changed the culture.
has a half brother playing with the pies I thinkRuccci has clarified saying it was a Melbourne based club….
Sent from my iPad using BigFooty.com
McHenry position last year was replaced by Rankine's inclusion, hence he was mainly used as the sub this year.We played McHenry ahead of this guy...
We thought we could do the same thing with Keath and GreenwoodIs there a possibility we could Hawthorn or Melbourne to bite package McAdam and our first to move up?
On Pixel 7 Pro using BigFooty.com mobile app
The poster I responded to claimed that murphy and sloane re-signings would have no effect on mcadam leaving..Wot?