Grand Uncle Horace
Shake down the thunder
Dead pm. Stupid rule
oh dear. From chocolates to boiled lollies.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Dead pm. Stupid rule
Yeah I’m inclined to agree on this. Should be a player’s decision - I think it’s different when literally everyone is given a character name or the like but if you want to claim a role in the thread and put a target on your own back you should be able to imoDead pm. Stupid rule
Yeah I’m inclined to agree on this. Should be a player’s decision - I think it’s different when literally everyone is given a character name or the like but if you want to claim a role in the thread and put a target on your own back you should be able to imo
Agreed. IMS was clear with the role but something I’d prefer eliminated in future games.Yeah I’m inclined to agree on this. Should be a player’s decision - I think it’s different when literally everyone is given a character name or the like but if you want to claim a role in the thread and put a target on your own back you should be able to imo
*ruleAgreed. IMS was clear with the role but something I’d prefer eliminated in future games.
O hai Fos. Grand Uncle Horace
it’s only a rule because some moron tried to play funny buggers last game and almost ruined it for everyone…Yeah I’m inclined to agree on this. Should be a player’s decision - I think it’s different when literally everyone is given a character name or the like but if you want to claim a role in the thread and put a target on your own back you should be able to imo
jmoo wan hadn't come in and tried to play funny buggers yet.Ah sh*t. I was interpreting it similar to the last one we did together. Saying the role was okay. Oh well. Sorry village
Thoughts on the P4L votes? Usually in that situation the player is a villager.Hello Dingster.
tier 1 player
lmao
Shut up I’m virtue signallingNope. Mods set the rules and it is up players to the read them. In games where everyone has a role, the rule makes sense.
Thoughts on the P4L votes? Usually in that situation the player is a villager.
50% believable.
I tend to agree with this. In a normal game, 100% role claiming who cares, there's a lot of villagers for example. But here, everyone has a role, so claiming it would take the fun out of it (as clever as it was that first time).not even harsh, if the whole village claimed their roles there'd be little to no mystery in the game whatsoever
Now I feel like I need to remove my Like on the post where he revealed his role and committed to the village...
Bangers and P4L swap votes Day 1 every game they play together, so not sure there is anything to look into there at this point.Thoughts on the P4L votes? Usually in that situation the player is a villager.
Usually I vote for omgfridge actually, so the hard-on is definitely a one-way thing. Jealousy is a curse unfortunately for Bangers.Bangers and P4L swap votes Day 1 every game they play together, so not sure there is anything to look into there at this point.
So what's your reason this time?Usually I vote for omgfridge actually, so the hard-on is definitely a one-way thing. Jealousy is a curse unfortunately for Bangers.
I haven't voted yet?So what's your reason this time?