Crouch divides many opinions.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Crouch divides many opinions.
missionpossiblet: 30852578 said:To be honest I don't think it matters who Brisbane pick as long as they don't go left field. aish, Billing, scharenberg, Sheed, Bontempelli all good for Brisbane.
Why would you use a top 12 or 15 pick on a less skilled Sam Mitchell?
It is Sam Mitchell's skill that makes him Sam Mitchell and not Matt Priddis.
Not sure why you are dissing Priddis when that guy has given us plenty of grief over the last few years. Personally I think Carlton do need another acculumator/clearance winnerWhy would you use a top 12 or 15 pick on a less skilled Sam Mitchell?
It is Sam Mitchell's skill that makes him Sam Mitchell and not Matt Priddis.
With Crouch you're talking about his ceiling being Priddis, while thàt is solid it is not amazing.
Tasmanians will usually slide on these, not worried. People just seen more of the players from the other states.I cannot believe a certain Tasmanian is still available, people must be scared off spelling his name, he is top 6 imo and quality. Also I like the pick of Salem TFLUA-Tiger he is a great prospect imo and I have him at 7. Personally I think Bontempelli is overrated and that whilst Freeman has a ton of potential there are a few holes in his game. Lastly I think Acres will go closer to 20, as whilst the talent is there to be very good I feel he has been overrated a fair bit.
Each to their own in how you rate him, some love him others not so much.Could be like Tom Liberatore too? We do need another another elite clearance winner.
I would be happy if Crouch could run hard and kick like Brock Mclean who is a terrific kick with both feet. Mclean weights his kick beautifully like a poor man's Mitchell, Williams or Ratten. "A neat kick in space" sounds more like your Shaun Grigg or Kane Lucas who are more outside mids. Don't want that after hearing that and another description of Crouch as being an OK kick. We need good kicks and decision makers.Sam Mitchell would be worth pick 2 in this draft.
Sam Mitchell isn't all skill with that rare ability to use it on both sides so well. He's also got the most natural inside game in the competition despite his relative lack of size but then also finds it outside.
Priddis would probably be worth a pick somewhere around 10 this year. Not everyone picked 10-20 even make the grade. And not so many become stars with usually only 1-2 exceptions to this most years in that draft range.
That said I'd take Crouch before I'd take Priddis. He'll find more of the footy. His kick while it's not Sam Mitchell's. No natural inside mid has that same type of ability on both sides as Mitchell and no other inside mids have that same ability by foot. By foot Crouch's weakness has been overstated. I have no issue with it. It's not heart in the mouth stuff with he has the ball. When it is, that's when you've got an issue.
It's like those who keep rabbitting on about Sheed lacking pace. It's overstated. He's a good player despite it. And if anything he's a relatively good mover the more I look at his game.
So I wouldn't make so much of relative weakness/limitations. If you do what you do better than the next guy you can make it in our game and not everyone has the ability to be a star, nor do they need to be a star to present value and be a strong selection.
I would be happy if Crouch could run hard and kick like Brock Mclean who is a terrific kick with both feet. Mclean weights his kick beautifully like a poor man's Mitchell, Williams or Ratten. "A neat kick in space" sounds more like your Shaun Grigg or Kane Lucas who are more outside mids. Don't want that after hearing that and another description of Crouch as being an OK kick. We need good kicks and decision makers.
No one really runs down and stops Mclean getting the ball. Brock doesn't stop moving in spite of his lack of pace. Terrific awareness and footy smarts plus a bigger engine than Crouch. Brock ran a 3.03 twenty metres and 14.7 beep at draft camp. Crouch is a lot slower than Mclean. Crouch might turn out to be a bargain or another Andrew Swallow, yet he doesn't appear to tick the boxes most would want in a mid. Especially with the interchange cap.
He was absolutely my second choice for the Dogs at four - and not too far behind Aish. I'm stunned he's still around to be taken.I cannot believe a certain Tasmanian is still available, people must be scared off spelling his name, he is top 6 imo and quality. Also I like the pick of Salem TFLUA-Tiger he is a great prospect imo and I have him at 7. Personally I think Bontempelli is overrated and that whilst Freeman has a ton of potential there are a few holes in his game. Lastly I think Acres will go closer to 20, as whilst the talent is there to be very good I feel he has been overrated a fair bit.
He was absolutely my second choice for the Dogs at four - and not too far behind Aish. I'm stunned he's still around to be taken.
Mitch Grigg blew his sprint at the combine in 2011, should have gone first round but because a perception was created he was too slow. Slid to us at 41!I couldn't care less about the interchange cap.
Crouch will learn to rotate forward and present as a marking target. Those inside types with that level of inside ability learn can learn that. Luke Ball learnt that. Brock McLean learnt that. He's got the hands where he can integrate that into his game.
Crouch is impressive because he doesn't have that running ability. He's first the to ball every time so it couldn't matter less. Once he's in a professional environment and builds that endurance he'll only reach greater heights.
It sounds like you underestimate Crouch's running game and footskills. You don't have to test well to be good. Testing means nothing.
Ask anyone who's watched Joel Wilkinson get a draft combine record of 2.75sec on the 20m sprint.
It's about what they do on the field. Not on the track.
And Crouch gets it done on the field.
This is how ridiculous sliders like Darling and Grundy come about.
Recruiters get fixed on a player they think will be around their mark and then ignore the inexplicable slider.
Happens every year.
His hype has built pretty steadily over the past month though because of his move to the wing. Has climbed significantly in a lot of peoples' calculations.Kolodjashnij didn't quite have the same amount of hype coming into his draft year as either of those two.
As I mentioned in my Bontempelli writeup Collingwood is too small, slow and workman like with few classy users of the footy and sticking to the theme of addressing these list weaknesses I'm again picking the only other guy along with Bontempelli who genuinely has the ability in this draft to become a star in this game with the combination of traits he has at his height while also having the production on the board.
Collingwood Pick 10 Blake Acres
My philosophy is when you can get quality size you take it. Acres as with Bontempelli is just another example of this.
Acres is a tall, classy user of the footy with extra time and space than the next guy with that evasive sidestep of his as well as some versatility, ability to win his own footy, tackle and the ability to take a grab.
Acres in the immediate would fit into my plans on a back flank or wing with those the glaring immediate weaknesses but eventually if and when Collingwood complete the back half and find someone else to become a wingman (hint: free agency next year) Acres I'd like to see become a full time midfielder who can rotate forward with this really where his value lies as someone who can find the footy easily wherever he plays but then also do damage with his touches with that extra time and space he has in combination with his precision ball use. He's just so unique at his height because you can genuinely play him anywhere and he'll look like the best guy out there.
Down back he'll read the play better than anyone else and take the intercept marks, win his 1v1s and then rack it up and use it better than anyone else but also provide meaningful rebound with his perfect footskills.
Up forward he'll find it just as easily with the way he finds the ball as a natural inside/outside accumulator. Provide a marking target but then also serious scoreboard impact as a natural finisher who will find it within range but then also push up the ground and be a playmaker with that ability to find the inside 50 targets.
Then through the midfield he'll win plenty of his own footy inside the contest as the most natural inside ball winner of all the tall midfielders this year but then balances that out with a natural outside game where he can equally find the footy and do his damage by foot.
Acres I feel will be one of the more immediate players despite being a tall as someone who performed so strongly this season showing that he can really find the footy. In addition to immediate performance he's also got monster long term potential going not only by that height and that combination of attributes but also that continued improvement. Acres is another story of he's got the pedigree. Both of his parents were athletes. He's got that endurance from his parents but then has also played plenty of basketball and you can really see it in his play in that Pendlebury type way.
He's been held back some with his shoulder this year but having seen enough guys from early picks put those injuries as juniors behind then - Judd/J.Selwood it's not something that concerns me. And the fact that he got through this year carrying that shoulder and still found and won so much of the ball so easily. That suggests to me that once he gets that shoulder right he has the opportunity to develop into an absolute monster of an onballer.
Had he been healthy people talk about him as someone who would quite possibly have featured in the top 10 but I think he would have been a top 5 selection had we seen a healthy Acres.