Mega Thread The inevitable Essendon verdict megathread - not convicted, but the circus rolls on

What level of red are you?

  • Zero redness

    Votes: 27 42.9%
  • Slightly red. Been reading the Bay

    Votes: 10 15.9%
  • Moderately red. Been reading the Pies board

    Votes: 3 4.8%
  • Full blown blistered. YEAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

    Votes: 23 36.5%

  • Total voters
    63

Remove this Banner Ad

Log in to remove this ad.

Drug research?

Haven't you guys done it all, stoner?

Maybe your club could show some ******* integrity and not "loose" the ******* evidence.

campaigner club full of cheating campaigners

I'm sorry the AFL are morally bankrupt, but today proves it.

The only reason why your club is still off the hook is because the AFL gave you a tip off.

WADA and the CAS will **** your club dry, maybe not today, maybe not tomorrow but one day.

They got Lance and they will get you.

gus-psyche-popcorn.gif
 
Oh right, so they should have interfered in the process AGAIN and made sure that Essendon was found guilty because you read a few articles about it and that makes you an expert.
If they did not interfere at the start this thing would of been over within 6 months.

The AFL gave essendon a tip off.
 
Troy Simmonds basically blantantly punches nick riewoldt in the face, whilst being in the possesion of the collar of his jumper...this makes it less of an offence (bull****).....= 1 week

Didak- trips....no harm done...= will likely get weeks

Tripping should just be a free - kick maybe even 50 m....
It is ridicoulous.

Tribunal is an absolute joke.....i realise this is old news...
but still..
fcuk it *****s me

Needed nearly 9 years for this thread to be replied to

Most irrelevant poster of all time
 
Do the essendon supporters realise they are not getting new players? it's just the players they have aren't getting suspended.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
"No evidence? That's just what they would say if Essendon was guilty!"

You muppets don't understand anything about how the legal system works. Stick to throwing down VBs in your wifebeaters and getting filthy at "the missus" when your team is losing

Look at Al Capone, one of the most violent criminals in history. Convicted on Tax evasion and contempt of court. Anything more substantial always ran into insufficient evidence, largely in part due to witnesses recanting or refusing to testify. Just because that's all they could prove doesn't change the fact he was a violent mobster who ordered/orchestrated the deaths of ~50 people if not more.

Just because ASADA weren't able to prove you were drug cheats doesn't that you aren't, especially when the case is dismissed due to a lack of evidence.

Congratulations on getting away with cheating though.
 
I appreciate this ruling as a slap in the face for muppets on BigFooty and the media who have been trying to beat up this issue for 2 years now without any evidence. Caroline Wilson, Patrick Smith, the Flogcast, your campaign of innuendo and gossip is over.

Lol good to see the flogcast is part of the established media :D
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Lol, the governance issues were the players being injected with performance enhancing drugs.

I'd make a bet with you but, well, you know...
 
I don't listen in anymore because it's too mainstream

What if I promised to grow a beard and wear a fedora next time I'm on to make it more 'underground' - would that bring you back?
 
Look at Al Capone, one of the most violent criminals in history. Convicted on Tax evasion and contempt of court. Anything more substantial always ran into insufficient evidence, largely in part due to witnesses recanting or refusing to testify. Just because that's all they could prove doesn't change the fact he was a violent mobster who ordered/orchestrated the deaths of ~50 people if not more.

Congratulations on getting away with cheating though.
They haven't. It took authorities years to finally make the charges against Lance Armstrong stick but in the end they succeeded.

WADA has been watching this saga play out from the beginning. They have a very high incidence of appealing non-guilty doping verdicts and this is an extremely high profile case.
Most of us have known from the beginning this will end up at CAS - where Essendon and the AFL hold absolutely no power. ;)
 
Gil says no soup for foamers.
Prick
A nice bowl of foamy soup would have been nice:oops:
 
They haven't. It took authorities years to finally make the charges against Lance Armstrong stick but in the end they succeeded.

WADA has been watching this saga play out from the beginning. They have a very high incidence of appealing non-guilty doping verdicts and this is an extremely high profile case.
Most of us have known from the beginning this will end up at CAS - where Essendon and the AFL hold absolutely no power. ;)

On what points do you believe they have an avenue for appeal?
And what is the percentage of not guilty non AAF cases that WADA have appealled?

Back into your hole you insufferable peanut
 
image.jpg
There's a really nice pho restaurant down the road from windy hill

I'm starting to think this was planned all along
We have a couple in Frankston now,pho places that is.

Of course it was,he said as much last week "insufficient evidence".
It was an afl appointed tribunal!.o_O:rolleyes:
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Mega Thread The inevitable Essendon verdict megathread - not convicted, but the circus rolls on

Back
Top