Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So basically every time we want to wear it, we've got to go to the AFL and ask, because of celebrating a historical significant game/event, then they probably say, go sort it out with Collingwood appears to be how it works.Thanks REH
Would help if KT could speak English but get the drift
I get the way you feel about it but I'm telling ya Koch ain't the guy for this.Everything since all this has started has literally been foot in the door and it’s opening.
The last time we wore them before this season was 2014 and that was from incompetence.
Now we are wearing them this year, will be next year and have promised to fight for coming years.
I don’t understand how that’s not on the road to victory.
Is it the ultimate end? No, but it’s a damn sight closer to it.
Koch gets us 2021 and every home showdown then he has done his job. I doubt he will be chair post 2021. the next bloke can fight harder than Koch.I get the way you feel about it but I'm telling ya Koch ain't the guy for this.
Hope you are right but as usual his limiting foot in mouth bile continues to hamper us.Koch gets us 2021 and every home showdown then he has done his job. I doubt he will be chair post 2021. the next bloke can fight harder than Koch.
Non-binding. Restraint of trade. Force majeure. Change of circumstances. Pandemic. Survival. $10,000,000 per club penalty. No crowds. No China. No-hopers on our side of the fence seemingly everywhere you look.I find it hard to believe we “signed it away” and even if we did it you’d think it would be non binding and would be ripped up under restraint of trade laws.
Spot on. Invariably and inevitably, our spiritual jumper WILL be the cornerstone of our playing strips in the AFL.Non-binding. Restraint of trade. Force majeure. Change of circumstances. Pandemic. Survival. $10,000,000 per club penalty. No crowds. No China. No-hopers on our side of the fence seemingly everywhere you look.
We just need one strong, righteous voice.
I think of Deng Xiaoping. There were these signed Hong Kong lease agreements with Perfidious Albion - which, by the way is an apt epithet for AFL House. One lease was signed circa 1840 and was ‘in perpetuity’. The second circa 1861, ditto. The third 1898, for a period of 99 years, covering 90% of HK acreage.
Thatcher says to Deng in 1982 the leases are ‘legal documents’ and two state ‘in perpetuity’.
“Things change,” Deng told her, and pointed at the calendar. “In 1997 we don’t care if we march into a wasteland. It will be OUR wasteland.”
You can’t second guess a strategy, and a voice, like that.
Eddie E. has no beef with the prison bars. It’s the black and the white, nebulous public domain, changing scenery that he, like Thatcher, insists is his and nobody else’s ... both before and after the change.
Watch your step, Eddie. The downward staircase has gravity on its side and you are getting fatter.
Off to court we go ... even though what was published by Collingwood is not a co-signed legal undertaking.I found this statement from Collingwood on their website from May 2007 that I saved. I think there is some bloviation in the statement but the basic conditions are set out.
Collingwood statement on heritage jumper
6:49 PM Mon 14 May, 2007 | Back
Collingwood Football Club
for collingwoodfc.com.au
The Collingwood Football Club is pleased to advise that it has worked with the AFL and has agreed to accept a number of undertakings from the Port Adelaide Football Club in relation to protecting the Collingwood black and white stripes.
Whilst acutely aware of the history of the Port Adelaide Magpies in the SANFL, Collingwood was determined to protect the guernsey it has worn for over 100 years.
After numerous approaches by both the AFL and Port Adelaide Collingwood was prepared to permit Port Adelaide to wear its black and white “prison bar” guernsey for heritage round games where Port Adelaide was the home team other than when they play against Collingwood.
More importantly Port Adelaide has agreed that it will never wear a guernsey of predominantly black and white stripes or any other combination of colour and design that clash with the traditional Collingwood uniform.
Port Adelaide has also agreed that it will not commercially manufacture their black and white heritage guernsey.
Collingwood Football Club is pleased to have finally resolved this outstanding issue and as a gesture of good will, has agreed to allow Port Adelaide to wear their heritage guernsey in its away game against the Western Bulldogs in round 14 of this season.
Off to court we go ... even though what was published by Collingwood is not a co-signed legal undertaking.
The defendant’s key phrases are: ‘protecting the Collingwood black and white stripes’ and ‘the traditional Collingwood uniform‘.
Both phrases apply to stripes that run full length from waistband to shoulder.
The Prison Bars do not. PAFC’s black and white stripes differ significantly from Collingwood’s.
Case closed. Get out Eddie. Don’t let the closing door bruise your fat arse.
I found this statement from Collingwood on their website from May 2007 that I saved. I think there is some bloviation in the statement but the basic conditions are set out.
Collingwood statement on heritage jumper
6:49 PM Mon 14 May, 2007 | Back
Collingwood Football Club
for collingwoodfc.com.au
The Collingwood Football Club is pleased to advise that it has worked with the AFL and has agreed to accept a number of undertakings from the Port Adelaide Football Club in relation to protecting the Collingwood black and white stripes.
Whilst acutely aware of the history of the Port Adelaide Magpies in the SANFL, Collingwood was determined to protect the guernsey it has worn for over 100 years.
After numerous approaches by both the AFL and Port Adelaide Collingwood was prepared to permit Port Adelaide to wear its black and white “prison bar” guernsey for heritage round games where Port Adelaide was the home team other than when they play against Collingwood.
More importantly Port Adelaide has agreed that it will never wear a guernsey of predominantly black and white stripes or any other combination of colour and design that clash with the traditional Collingwood uniform.
Port Adelaide has also agreed that it will not commercially manufacture their black and white heritage guernsey.
Collingwood Football Club is pleased to have finally resolved this outstanding issue and as a gesture of good will, has agreed to allow Port Adelaide to wear their heritage guernsey in its away game against the Western Bulldogs in round 14 of this season.
#sackcardoneOur club is too weak to go that route unfortunately.
You’re right, it’s a significantly different design.Off to court we go ... even though what was published by Collingwood is not a co-signed legal undertaking.
The defendant’s key phrases are: ‘protecting the Collingwood black and white stripes’ and ‘the traditional Collingwood uniform‘.
Both phrases apply to stripes that run full length from waistband to shoulder.
The Prison Bars do not. PAFC’s black and white stripes differ significantly from Collingwood’s.
Case closed. Get out Eddie. Don’t let the closing door bruise your fat arse.
Let’s compromise - Prison Balls.I don’t care for the prison bars, what I care about is our club grows some balls
Back on Hall of Fame, Rucci's article on the club website today covered the AFL, SANFL and PAFC Halls of Fame.
Rucci used to be (maybe still is?) a HoF selector, so may know something?
Did bio's of the current Port HoF members, then covered the SA Hall members and members of our Greatest Team.
Finished by stating that several members of Port's greatest team had compelling CV's for AFLHoF entry.
Maybe he knows something???? Let's wait and see tonite's and tomorrow night's Fox footy shows. Here's hoping