Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
- Any time a player gets called a 'genius'. Hawking & Einstein are geniuses. Hawkins & Goldstein are not.
- Regarding player name pronunciation, how do you pronounce Veszpremi? I always thought that 'sz' is pronounced 'sh', but commentators just seem to pronounce it as 'z'.
You lot are easily upset by words.
Too easily, imo.
I blame our increasingly comfortable lifestyles giving us fewer and fewer legitimate things to complain about.
So, instead, we turn to minor things like the use of americanisms and new phrases in our sporting parlance to vent our frustrations at life.
Words are simply meant to convey a concept. When Russell says, 'Thomas shorts it to Beams', we all know what he means: Thomas kicked a short pass to Beams. When McAvaney says, 'Oh, he's delicious, isn't he?', he simply means that Rioli is (in his opinion) a pleasant footballer to watch ply his trade. When Brereton says, 'They are missing somebody to play that quarterback role', he simply means that with Hodge out, Hawthorn lack that extra defender with enough football smarts and disposal efficiency to find the ball and then hit targets to set up offensive plays from the back half.
I could go on, but the point is that we all know what these guys mean when they use these terms. That's all words are meant to do: convey to us, the listener, the thoughts going through the head of the commentator saying those words. So long as commentators aren't saying stuff like, 'Cotchin squarbles the ticketmachine to Vickery, who extends his arms but roasts another turkey, King gathers it, looks around for a golddigger, ices the muffintop, who plays on to Martin who has a gloopenheigen from 50... and strays it for another behind', then I really don't see the need for the fuss.*
Words are just words. Your life would be much more enjoyable if you simply accepted their use for what it is and relaxed. There are much better things to worry about, and even most of those things aren't worth worrying about.
*Even in this example, I reckon most football followers could work out exactly what happened in that play
Also, the way a lot of the younger commentators/ex-players are calling marks 'catches'.
Eeeewww.
agree x10. who cares that commentators use a bit of slang/jargon - i'm sure if you go back to the so called 'glory days' of 90s ch7 then you'll find common phrases popping up as well
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynasty_(sports)"Dynasty" - Completely incorrect use of the word. A team could win 5 premierships in a row and it still wouldn't be a dynasty because a dynasty is a succession of rulers from the same family. eg. Grandfather to the father to the son. Baffling that this ever became a football term.
"And you've got your Goddards and your Bartels and your Hodges, etc, etc" to describe a type of player. Is it that hard to say "and you've got your midfielders who can take a strong mark and push forward and kick a couple goals"?