"Coswejustlovethafooty"
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
You lot are easily upset by words.
Too easily, imo.
I blame our increasingly comfortable lifestyles giving us fewer and fewer legitimate things to complain about.
So, instead, we turn to minor things like the use of americanisms and new phrases in our sporting parlance to vent our frustrations at life.
Words are simply meant to convey a concept. When Russell says, 'Thomas shorts it to Beams', we all know what he means: Thomas kicked a short pass to Beams. When McAvaney says, 'Oh, he's delicious, isn't he?', he simply means that Rioli is (in his opinion) a pleasant footballer to watch ply his trade. When Brereton says, 'They are missing somebody to play that quarterback role', he simply means that with Hodge out, Hawthorn lack that extra defender with enough football smarts and disposal efficiency to find the ball and then hit targets to set up offensive plays from the back half.
I could go on, but the point is that we all know what these guys mean when they use these terms. That's all words are meant to do: convey to us, the listener, the thoughts going through the head of the commentator saying those words. So long as commentators aren't saying stuff like, 'Cotchin squarbles the ticketmachine to Vickery, who extends his arms but roasts another turkey, King gathers it, looks around for a golddigger, ices the muffintop, who plays on to Martin who has a gloopenheigen from 50... and strays it for another behind', then I really don't see the need for the fuss.*
Words are just words. Your life would be much more enjoyable if you simply accepted their use for what it is and relaxed. There are much better things to worry about, and even most of those things aren't worth worrying about.
*Even in this example, I reckon most football followers could work out exactly what happened in that play
When teams start winning and a commentator goes "You can really see they're believing in themselves now" "the belief is building" that kinda crap. Usually from Brian Taylor.
Also hating the way they pronounce Ree-volt for Riewoldt and Broost for Bruest.
Keep an eye on this new one to gain some momentum in footy circles...
Jack Riewoldt said in an interview the other day when talking about things that continued to be worked on, "our compliance".
Expect it to quickly become trendy in sentences regarding structures and systems etc...
Disappointing is chronically overused.
The start of every Ross Lyin sentence when he's being interviewed....
"The reality is....."
Geez its irritating!
Half volley.
So he is just faster.
Dwayne Russell drops this comment every now & then
Player X kicks a splits the middle with a set shot & Dwayne proclaims "IT'S A SPEAR"....
JB is a funny one. Every time he interviews a player he sounds like someone’s dad who just got home to find his son sitting round with a few of his mates, and is trying to join in the conversation... but just sounds awkward.
Probably my favourite is Tim Lane, I like the way he goes about it in a no-nonsense kind of way. Reminds me of English commentators, they just describe the game.
You lot are easily upset by words.
Too easily, imo.
I blame our increasingly comfortable lifestyles giving us fewer and fewer legitimate things to complain about.
So, instead, we turn to minor things like the use of americanisms and new phrases in our sporting parlance to vent our frustrations at life.
Words are simply meant to convey a concept. When Russell says, 'Thomas shorts it to Beams', we all know what he means: Thomas kicked a short pass to Beams. When McAvaney says, 'Oh, he's delicious, isn't he?', he simply means that Rioli is (in his opinion) a pleasant footballer to watch ply his trade. When Brereton says, 'They are missing somebody to play that quarterback role', he simply means that with Hodge out, Hawthorn lack that extra defender with enough football smarts and disposal efficiency to find the ball and then hit targets to set up offensive plays from the back half.
I could go on, but the point is that we all know what these guys mean when they use these terms. That's all words are meant to do: convey to us, the listener, the thoughts going through the head of the commentator saying those words. So long as commentators aren't saying stuff like, 'Cotchin squarbles the ticketmachine to Vickery, who extends his arms but roasts another turkey, King gathers it, looks around for a golddigger, ices the muffintop, who plays on to Martin who has a gloopenheigen from 50... and strays it for another behind', then I really don't see the need for the fuss.*
Words are just words. Your life would be much more enjoyable if you simply accepted their use for what it is and relaxed. There are much better things to worry about, and even most of those things aren't worth worrying about.
*Even in this example, I reckon most football followers could work out exactly what happened in that play