- Feb 19, 2011
- 3,701
- 5,019
- AFL Club
- Geelong
No, not really. Have you never walked along a crowded footpath and either you or the person in your direct path have turned a shoulder to the side to avoid a collision? It's just something humans do with very little thought. We make adjustments all the time. Someone pulls across into our lane on the freeway a little too close and we ease off to give them more room.
People are prejudiced towards Greene. They think he is a grubby psycho-thug-dog. It's clouding their whole view of the so-called "bumping" incident. They think he was angrily berating Stevic. People need to grip and realise Greene was asking him about a decision - without any malice, but a normal difference of opinion between a player and umpire, except that he's walked a little close. That's all that has happened here. Bad optics which has led to people jumping down's Greene's throat.
Malifice was saying before that Greene "made a beeline" towards the ump, but this is bullshit. Greene was walking towards the huddle with 5 or 6 of his teammates when he asked the ump "Why wasn't that a free?" or whatever and Stevic stood there in the middle of the players' paths to answer whatever it was Greene was asking him about.
Greene's fate rests in Stevic's hands. The AFL will ask Stevic what happened and depending on Stevic's answer, Greene will or won't have a case to answer. My guess is the AFL may give Greene a $1500 fine because of the optics. "Don't walk too close to umpires!" etc etc... Or they'll say "no case to answer".
But nobody here is going to admit they were wrong. They will all say it's an AFL conspiracy to protect their love child and that Greene owes a Stevic a beer for lying on his behalf and saving his arse.
Yeah yeah, Greene went up and asked the teacher a question and just happened to make contact as you do walking down the street