Tom Mitchell 50 possessions

[HeHateMe]

So? His impact was medium. Never looked like he was seriously hurting Pies. For a guy to get 50 posies and not get BOG tells you something. Joel Selwood gets 50 posies and Cats win by 6 goals plus.

what does it tell you?

Other then he was Hawks Best on Ground......

 

[HeHateMe]

Hip hip hooray. I'm happy for him. Doesn't mean they were great possessions.

lol, QQ

 

[HairyO]

If you watched the game you would see most of Mitchell's handballs went to a player who was manned up and about to be tackled. He wasn't putting players into space

Makes you wonder how those players managed to move the ball so far.

28 handballs I think. How many went to olayers who were tackled?

 

[Frank Gallagher]

So? His impact was medium. Never looked like he was seriously hurting Pies. For a guy to get 50 posies and not get BOG tells you something. Joel Selwood gets 50 posies and Cats win by 6 goals plus.

Even Selwood couldn't get 50 frees in a game.

 

[Yellow Feathers]

So? His impact was medium. Never looked like he was seriously hurting Pies. For a guy to get 50 posies and not get BOG tells you something. Joel Selwood gets 50 posies and Cats win by 6 goals plus.

#1 in the entire league for assisted metres gained.

What more do you want? 400+ players going around, I'm sure Tom Mitchell isn't the worst player to have on your list.

 

[HairyO]

Even Selwood couldn't get 50 frees in a game.

Cats win 75% of the time when Selwood gets less than 20 possessions. Based on the Mitchell logic here I would say he has little impact on the games he plays.

 

[Frank Gallagher]

Cats win 75% of the time when Selwood gets less than 20 possessions. Based on the Mitchell logic here I would say he has little impact on the games he plays.

It's a funny thing, if Collingwood lost that match the experts (so called) would be saying not tagging him cost us the game, but now their saying not tagging him actually won us the game, go figure.

Fact is he was very good, and if he didn't play we would've won by a fair bit more IMO.

 

[HairyO]

It's a funny thing, if Collingwood lost that match the experts (so called) would be saying not tagging him cost us the game, but now their saying not tagging him actually won us the game, go figure.

Fact is he was very good, and if he didn't play we would've won by a fair bit more IMO.

Yep. He has been by far our most consistent player this year.

It wasnt just 50 possessions. 8 tackles and a forward 50m mark that he really should have converted.

He is carrying our midfield at the moment and hasnt once dropped his shoulders and given up.

 

[Seedsfan]

Makes you wonder how those players managed to move the ball so far.

28 handballs I think. How many went to olayers who were tackled?

There is a reason that he only got 5 votes in the coaches votes as he does **** all with the ball. He doesn't hurt sides

 

[HairyO]

There is a reason that he only got 5 votes in the coaches votes as he does **** all with the ball. He doesn't hurt sides

He was considered 3rd and 4th best on the ground. So he was ahead of 40 other players.

And Clarko never gives 5 votes to our players if we lose. Ever.

Swan won a Brownlow getting useless possessions every week. And he got far less as well.

 

[Seedsfan]

He was considered 3rd and 4th best on the ground. So he was ahead of 40 other players.

And Clarko never gives 5 votes to our players if we lose. Ever.

Swan won a Brownlow getting useless possessions every week. And he got far less as well.

Lol comparing Tom Mitchell to Swan. Now tell me when has Tom Mitchell ever average 30+ disposals and more than a goal a game? Swan could and would hurt sides Tom Mitchell doesn't hurt anyone

 

[HeHateMe]

There is a reason that he only got 5 votes in the coaches votes as he does **** all with the ball. He doesn't hurt sides

you make that sound like a bad thing.
Pendls the only player to get more.

Tom is currently averaging 35 Disposals a game and 1 shot at goal.

 

[HairyO]

Lol comparing Tom Mitchell to Swan. Now tell me when has Tom Mitchell ever average 30+ disposals and more than a goal a game? Swan could and would hurt sides Tom Mitchell doesn't hurt anyone

Mitchell has done it twice this year in a team that sucks. He also did it a number of times last year at the Swans.

 

[LoungeLizard]

He was considered 3rd and 4th best on the ground. So he was ahead of 40 other players.

And Clarko never gives 5 votes to our players if we lose. Ever.

Swan won a Brownlow getting useless possessions every week. And he got far less as well.

What is your point here?
Are you saying Mitchell gets useless possessions, but could win a brownlow?
Very strange post.

 

[Seedsfan]

Mitchell has done it twice this year in a team that sucks. He also did it a number of times last year at the Swans.

If you have achieved a statistical feat twice it is hardly an average. I am taking about when he averages those stats season after season

 

[HeHateMe]

What is your point here?
Are you saying Mitchell gets useless possessions, but could win a brownlow?
Very strange post.

Clearly he was throwing out a bone to all the people claiming "Useless possessions"

Like Swan he says...... yeah really useless lmao...

Comprehension not a strong point for you LL?

 

[LoungeLizard]

Clearly he was throwing out a bone to all the people claiming "Useless possessions"

Like Swan he says...... yeah really useless lmao...

Comprehension not a strong point for you LL?

Explain to me then why he bought Swan into the equation?

 

[HeHateMe]

Explain to me then why he bought Swan into the equation?

Yep comprehension isn't your strong point, that has been thoroughly covered. Allgoods LL.

 

[LoungeLizard]

Yep comprehension isn't your strong point, That has been thoroughly covered. Allgoods LL.

So you can't?
The only thing Swan and Mitchell have in common is they were both midfielders.
So i think your comprehension skills might be the one lacking.

 

[Pessimistic]

It's a funny thing, if Collingwood lost that match the experts (so called) would be saying not tagging him cost us the game, but now their saying not tagging him actually won us the game, go figure.

Fact is he was very good, and if he didn't play we would've won by a fair bit more IMO.

It is funny isn't it. Mitchell out would have been out sixth or seventh best 22 player missing in a game every one tipped Collingwood. It's nether great or poor

 

[HeHateMe]

So you can't?
The only thing Swan and Mitchell have in common is they were both midfielders.
So i think your comprehension skills might be the one lacking.

Lol, you got "Can't" from "already covered". Check yourself LL. hahahaha

 

[LoungeLizard]

Lol, you got "Can't" from "already covered". Check yourself LL. hahahaha

It hasn't been covered at all, all i see here is you lot are trying to defend Mitchell by bring up Swan, even if Swan got "useless possessions" it makes no sense.
So see if you can explain it.

 

[HeHateMe]

It hasn't been covered at all, all i see here is you lot are trying to defend Mitchell by bring up Swan, even if Swan got "useless possessions" it makes no sense.
So see if you can explain it.

"You lot!, Even if swan gets 'Useless Possesions'."

Don't put words in my mouth i have done no such thing but answer questions about the topic.
So you think Swan gets useless possessions?

Now we wait for the penny to drop...... hahahahaha

 

[boncer34]

"You lot!, Even if swan gets 'Useless Possesions'."

Don't put words in my mouth i have done no such thing but answer questions about the topic.
So you think Swan gets useless possessions?

Now we wait for the penny to drop...... hahahahaha

Mate if you think your posting is coming across anything other then pathetic and childish you'd be mistaking.

 

[HeHateMe]

Mate if you think your posting is coming across anything other then pathetic and childish you'd be mistaking.

tis the tread for it.