pick 8 which could get you an AA 60+ goal a year when fit j daniher?How is pick 8 a win-win.
Papley is a sure thing.
Pick 8 is a kid you hope becomes a great player.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
pick 8 which could get you an AA 60+ goal a year when fit j daniher?How is pick 8 a win-win.
Papley is a sure thing.
Pick 8 is a kid you hope becomes a great player.
Unless Daniher comes in you won't give up Papley for anything. If things go that way holding onto pick 4 and giving Essendon pick 8 would be the only reason you guys entertain the idea.How is pick 8 a win-win.
Papley is a sure thing.
Pick 8 is a kid you hope becomes a great player.
Who wants to be a Blue? Last time I checked, he hasn't requested a trade, he hasn't nominated a club and Sydney have no intention of trading him. Have you got a source for that?Do you really want to keep a player who wants to be a Blue just to spite us?
Its a win-win if he leaves for pick 8.
Unless Daniher comes in you won't give up Papley for anything. If things go that way holding onto pick 4 and giving Essendon pick 8 would be the only reason you guys entertain the idea.
It's the only reason this door is still ajar, he has 4 years left on his contract and ideally you would add Daniher to him but if you have someone in mind at pick 4 you think will be better then Papley you cash in.
It won't ever be a decision of what will you do with pick 8 it is tossing up having Daniher + Papley or Daniher + pick 4.
Pick 8 has a higher ceiling, lower floor. Risk/reward of trading draft picks. This isn't a new concept.How is pick 8 a win-win.
Papley is a sure thing.
Pick 8 is a kid you hope becomes a great player.
Pick 8 has a higher ceiling, lower floor. Risk/reward of trading draft picks. This isn't a new concept.
Papley is a known quantity. But pick 8 has higher reward potential.
Probably. Or I just didn’t read it as I’m not overly invested in the argument. It was a while ago so I’ve forgottenDid you purposely ignore the third paragraph of my post?
By your ridiculous "logic" you can have 2 rookie picks from us so u can draft two more papleys.And Goodes got drafted at pick 43, meaning technically pick 43 has a higher reward potential... doesn't mean I would trade Papley for it.
If we got someone as good as Papley at pick 4, I would accept it and run.
By your ridiculous "logic" you can have 2 rookie picks from us so u can draft two more papleys.
They will potentially draft the next Ablett. I'm excited to see how it pans out.Or Carlton could use their Pick 4 or 8 and draft in their own Papley
This years crop of players is no where near as deep as it was last season. So pick 8 this season would get you the talent pick 20 got us last season.Pick 8 has a higher ceiling, lower floor. Risk/reward of trading draft picks. This isn't a new concept.
Papley is a known quantity. But pick 8 has higher reward potential.
No.I don’t want it to happen, but Swans should definitely ask about Marchbank in addition to pick 8, and then flicking Carlton a second or future second.
They won’t get Weitering, Macreadie probably isn’t up to the mark, but there may be some wriggle-room with Marchbank given he’s the third best key defender in our setup.
I agree. We haven't been in this position for many a year. We have a very young list now & we will take advantage of Free Agency. We were probably targeting Daniher for next season. We were talking to Buddy before he played against us in the 2012 GF & got him for nothing to play in 2014.Pick 8 is most likely pick 10....
Pick 4 probably 6
I don’t see papley going next year....maybe the following
Likewise Daniher...
What is the Swans Salary Cap situation like ? Surely if they get Joe Daniher (who would get a pretty tidy long term deal) they might to have squeeze someone like Papley out anyway to balance the Cap (although I am just guessing here)
They don't have many high profile players, they wouldn't have any salary issues.
Swans just bluffing to get a higher pick. They know his heart beats blue.
Heart beats blue lol
And Goodes got drafted at pick 43, meaning technically pick 43 has a higher reward potential... doesn't mean I would trade Papley for it.
If we got someone as good as Papley at pick 4, I would accept it and run.
The AFL runs the Swans Salary capWhat is the Swans Salary Cap situation like ? Surely if they get Joe Daniher (who would get a pretty tidy long term deal) they might to have squeeze someone like Papley out anyway to balance the Cap (although I am just guessing here)
An article from 2015? Lol.