I actually don’t mind John’s attempts to use best and fairest data to inform an opinion… and I like other folks suggestions that it provides an incomplete picture and that one could include ladder position/finals wins etc. to add weight to said opinion… and I don’t dispute that Roo and McLeod were two of the all time greats to play the game… and yet despite him not even being on this list, having never won a best and fairest/brownlow/norm smith, I will go to my grave arguing that Darren Jarman is the best footballer I’ve ever seen play the game. Not the most dominant or consistent certainly, but the best? Yep. Hands down the most talented/creative/intelligent footballer I’ve watched. So using the methodology of me watching and enjoying football, Darren Jarman is the best to ever pull on the Crows guernsey. And everyone who disagrees with me is wrong. Why? Because I said so.
I guess I’m also saying that any metric that has Darren Jarman outside the top 10 Crows over the years is pretty flawed… but interesting. I like it.
I don’t agree with Jarman that high, but I absolutely do agree with the entertainment factor - he was so good to watch. I loved watching him play.
I’ll argue David Rhys Jones was the best kick I ever saw, but Jarman was mighty close
The problem with the good doctors methodology is not that it produces perverse, unjustifiable results (though it does) it’s his bizarre attempt to deny that choice of methodology is subjective
As usual, he doesn’t understand words