TedDougChris
🏆 🦍
- Mar 10, 2007
- 52,545
- 98,137
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
- Other Teams
- Charlton Athletic, Roys FFC
Depth
Do we do that ?? Isn't there a law against it ?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Depth
Only counts if they are under 85kgDo we do that ?? Isn't there a law against it ?
Only counts if they are under 85kg
A lot of ayces up our sleevesThat explains it !! So we could have had a dozen Ayce Cordy's..... Now that would be depth....
I guess you have to back Bevo in and although its one of the riskiest moves in the business, you hope that the Doggies albeit are OK with the possibility of trading Jake, are treating this as a wake up call. The do hold all the cards remember as Jake is contracted. Jake did not seem disgruntled but seemed like a young boy looking for help and direction. He has been told that the club is prepared to trade him, but only on the clubs terms. I'm backing the club in and I think Jake will remain a bulldog for 2018 and beyond.
I do not like how his manager handles himself and I feel he is almost treating him like a peice of meat shopping him around, rather than trying to repair the relationship - I do believe that is is repairable.
That's a very good point. You would think his manager would have to know something about what has been going on, and for how long. He hasn't hit back at the club in high dudgeon about how his client is being treated but seems quite accepting, as well as prepared. This hasn't come as a shock to Connors. Jake maybe has been in denial.And I'd be interested in knowing how long ago Connors became aware of the difficulties and conversations we were having with Stringer and to what level of detail. Surely at least 12 months (since he was dropped to the VFL in 2016).
Would he have just relied on Jake to tell him or would he have had a discussion with the club too?
Depth
Don't expect many coaching changes this off season
Likely only adding part time coaches and more vfl staff
Well, that's just shit. Someone said recently we were going to be making coaching changes, maybe Pugz89?Don't expect many coaching changes this off season
Likely only adding part time coaches and more vfl staff
Who knowsCan we at least go back to last years setup ??
Wait. I was told in the media there was going to be carnage at VUWO, both players and staff.Don't expect many coaching changes this off season
Likely only adding part time coaches and more vfl staff
Saad looking for a move home to Melbourne apparently. Partnering him with JJ off that backline would be killer.
I am all for professional development, have rotated team members through positions for a number of years, but you want to minimise disruptions to key areas.Who knows
But I believe Paul Groves will have more involvement with the vfl players and part time at the club when the AFLW season is on
GCS's problem has been attracting and keeping quality players. They don't need more high draft picks. They need some well-performed players who want to play out their career there.What would GC want?
If I were them, it would be a player.
Tom Lynch looks set to become an "AFL Ambassador". He could well become the first $2m pa player in AFL history if you include AFL payments and marketing allowance.That's a tough ask. If any side gets a COLA or hardship allowance it should be them (and only them). They may need to pay over market value to get and retain the players they need.
QED. The implication is he'd almost certainly be headed somewhere south without the bonus role.Tom Lynch looks set to become an "AFL Ambassador". He could well become the first $2m pa player in AFL history if you include AFL payments and marketing allowance.