- Sep 22, 2008
- 25,524
- 34,636
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
- Banned
- #4,276
Thanks, his kicking looks great on his YouTube videos so that’s a bit of a surprise
Strategy Trade and List management Thread Part 6 (opposition supporters - READ posting rules before posting)
- Thread starter Norm De Guerre
- Start date
- Tagged users None
- Status
We need a small defender. Let's sign Lachie Young up as a DFA
I doubt it's as clean as all 3 1sts for Pick 4.
I think it would more likely be something like:
10, 17, and F1 for Pick 4, Pick 35 and F2.
That would be we get Watson, still have points for Croft, and could take a late 2nd rounder, while only downgrading our F1
I think it would more likely be something like:
10, 17, and F1 for Pick 4, Pick 35 and F2.
That would be we get Watson, still have points for Croft, and could take a late 2nd rounder, while only downgrading our F1
- Sep 7, 2015
- 16,168
- 38,124
- AFL Club
- Tasmania
This joke never grows old (Because it has been old since inception)
- Oct 12, 2012
- 7,556
- 12,162
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
If we really are offering 10, 17 and F1 for GC's pic 4 then we are getting their F2 back too. Still not sure I'm OK with it. We'd be backing ourselves to finish high and GC low in the hope those 2 pics are close.
For all the people saying that we might be bad next year, we'll be losing JUH and Naughton and Baz if that is the case, as well as wasting Bont and Libba. Our squad is too good to be a bottom 4 team. So why not risk the future 1st and go hard and start plugging these holes immediately.
Well, the way the AFL have set it up for the pathetic welfare cheats that they can have everyone, again.
Agree. But this administration has never been under as much pressure as it is now. Might make them do something silly.
- Sep 4, 2014
- 3,326
- 4,778
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
We could be looking at a player or players from GC. I'm guessing we are interested in Hollands? Anyone heard anything?
Pick 17 needs to be traded for a future first.
Pick 10 to North or Dees for future picks.
We settle for Croft (bid likely at pick 8, Bombers).
Then have a big draft next year.
Croft is too good to pass up and the cost of pick 4 is probably too high.
Pick 10 to North or Dees for future picks.
We settle for Croft (bid likely at pick 8, Bombers).
Then have a big draft next year.
Croft is too good to pass up and the cost of pick 4 is probably too high.
Why would Sam Power be under pressure he is doing his job.
- Aug 15, 2014
- 11,467
- 24,142
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
- Other Teams
- Chicago Bulls
We’re not getting anything close to a F1 for pick 17. Pick 17 in reality is going to be closer to 22-23 anyway so no one is going to take that risk.
The best we can hope for is maybe one of the 2024 North compo picks or maybe a WCE F2.
When a team with our talent doesn't make finals, everyone would be feeling the pressure.
That’s on the coaching staff not the list manager
And I'm guessing it wouldn't be Powers decision alone. Last year Bevo held up the Dunkley trade because he wanted a swap of late picks. Grant was involved with the Schache trade.
It's more than just Sam Power.
- Sep 22, 2008
- 25,524
- 34,636
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
- Banned
- #4,292
Edwards any good? Was pretty highly rated in his MSD year and not his fault he got Norf’d. Is he purely a key forward or could he develop as a mobile ruck?
- Dec 3, 2009
- 19,339
- 19,603
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
- Other Teams
- Footscray Bulldogs, Williamstown
The only way I can see us throwing in the F1 is if there's a Suns player that we want to get that would make the cost a little less insane.
Wouldn’t want any player that gets delisted by North Melbourne
- May 23, 2019
- 12,377
- 30,312
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
Nope. Look at his VFL stats, bloody terrible. My impression is that he was a good junior ruck/fwd because he was big but couldn’t bring it up to even VFL level against men. Or his head was never in the game.
[/QUOTE]
I thought he had pretty serious concussion concerns.
If we're using it future first I'd prefer pick 8 and 10 to pick 4
I thought he had pretty serious concussion concerns.
Would pick 17 and F1 be enough for pick 8 from the bombers?
If we're using it future first I'd prefer pick 8 and 10 to pick 4
- May 23, 2019
- 12,377
- 30,312
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
Geelong has also brought up trading out their pick.
_Cerberus_
Club Legend
- Sep 30, 2022
- 2,901
- 5,650
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
Pick 8 and 10, will become picks 11/12 and 13/14 come draft night. Doesn't look as good as it seems.
But I would rather that than selling the farm for pick 4. Gives us two first round picks across the next two years as opposed to just one.
Last edited:
I thought he had pretty serious concussion concerns.
Would pick 17 and F1 be enough for pick 8 from the bombers?
If we're using it future first I'd prefer pick 8 and 10 to pick 4[/QUOTE]
Decent idea.
I suspect the Bombers would bid on Croft, so getting their pick would be ideal.
Would pick 17 and F1 be enough for pick 8 from the bombers?
If we're using it future first I'd prefer pick 8 and 10 to pick 4[/QUOTE]
Decent idea.
I suspect the Bombers would bid on Croft, so getting their pick would be ideal.
- Status
