Strategy Trade and List management Thread Part 6 (opposition supporters - READ posting rules before posting)

[Dogsman16]

Cooney is a complete moron.

Smith for Billings and Zerk Thatcher JHC

View attachment 1827095

Just for some context pick 14 is received by us also.

Still a terrible deal for fringe/junk players.

 

[doggy_dog]

Cooney is a complete moron.

Smith for Billings and Zerk Thatcher JHC

View attachment 1827095

This is up there with Wayne Carey’s three VFL players for pick 1

 

[Dale4captain]

West Coast asking for pick 2, another top 10 pick and a future first for pick 1. Using our deal as precedent by the sounds of it.

North definitely have the capacity to offer that if they want Reid. Weirdly, I believe Curtin and Watson would be MUCH more beneficial for Norths rebuild but who am I to stand in the way of them making dumb choices and bolstering their young midfield for a 5th draft in a row.

 

[Golden_6]

West Coast asking for pick 2, another top 10 pick and a future first for pick 1. Using our deal as precedent by the sounds of it.

North definitely have the capacity to offer that if they want Reid. Weirdly, I believe Curtin and Watson would be MUCH more beneficial for Norths rebuild but who am I to stand in the way of them making dumb choices and bolstering their young midfield for a 5th draft in a row.

That's definitely way too much. I think pick 2 (for Curtin) and a F1 is probably spot on given that's very likely to be a top 3 pick.

 

[Dale4captain]

That's definitely way too much. I think pick 2 (for Curtin) and a F1 is probably spot on given that's very likely to be a top 3 pick.

I dare say the F1 will probably be one of the poverty picks they were given. Not an early First.

 

[Chalky White]

Harmes has agreed to terms on a 3 year deal

I've heard this also

 

[cherrypie]

Cooney is a complete moron.

Smith for Billings and Zerk Thatcher JHC

View attachment 1827095

According to this Billings + Zerk-Thatcher = 8 + 41. But individually Zerk-Thatcher = 27 and Billings = 41???

 

[Snarls Barkley]

According to this Billings + Zerk-Thatcher = 8 + 41. But individually Zerk-Thatcher = 27 and Billings = 41???

As said in the post below, the graphic was wrong and pick 14 would also be Dogs (traded out by Melbourne, in by no one in the graphic)

 

[Dogs Rule]

As said in the post below, the graphic was wrong and pick 14 would also be Dogs (traded out by Melbourne, in by no one in the graphic)

Point remains that I'm sure the wind blows right through Cooney's ears.

 

[Snarls Barkley]

Point remains that I'm sure the wind blows right through Cooney's ears.

Haha that it true. No doubt

But was slightly deceptive posting the wrong graphic without a clarification

 

[Scragger77]

If for some reason Curtin slides to our pick do we take him instead of Watson/midfielder?

 

[Mofra]

It’s easier to digest if you think of it as Croft being drafted next year not this year.

If he was eligible next year, we would have traded our 1st for a heap of later picks anyway. We’ve just done it a year early and helped us trade up to the elite part of the draft as well.

There's every chance if he was available next year our natural 2024 first round pick could very well be before he is nominated

 

[Mofra]

If for some reason Curtin slides to our pick do we take him instead of Watson/midfielder?

In a heartbeat

 

[Mojorisin]

In a heartbeat

Curtin doesn't do it for me.

 

[Hoges64]

Can we refuse to take his kid after this.

Deleted tweet?

Was it good?

 

[bobs head soup]

West Coast asking for pick 2, another top 10 pick and a future first for pick 1. Using our deal as precedent by the sounds of it.

North definitely have the capacity to offer that if they want Reid. Weirdly, I believe Curtin and Watson would be MUCH more beneficial for Norths rebuild but who am I to stand in the way of them making dumb choices and bolstering their young midfield for a 5th draft in a row.

I reckon WCE have 2 options with 1.

They either (a) take Reid or (b) trade down very slightly to turn it into Curtin and extras.

If they want option (b), then North are the only realistic option. North would be saying to Eagles that they'll be taking Curtin at 2/3 if Eagles don't, therefore making any other bids for 1 improbable.

From there, all bluster aside, North probably have the upper hand as to what the extras will be.

With all their extra end of firsts, 2 or more of them (this year and next) would be a good starting point.

 

[El Rancho]

If for some reason Curtin slides to our pick do we take him instead of Watson/midfielder?

Damn straight we do. We need defensive help and there are no questions surrounding his body like Buss

 

[bobs head soup]

Damn straight we do. We need defensive help and there are no questions surrounding his body like Buss

As fans we talk about selections in terms of list needs, but when a recruiter gets a top 5 pick they're purely picking the player they think is best available.

 

[El Rancho]

As fans we talk about selections in terms of list needs, but when a recruiter gets a top 5 pick they're purely picking the player they think is best available.

I get that, and it very well could be that Curtain is the best available at that point, hence, I would take him

 

[Dogs Rule]

Haha that it true. No doubt

But was slightly deceptive posting the wrong graphic without a clarification

I'll blame Trade Radio for putting it up in the first place. That or Elon.

 

[RedWhite&Blue]

No, the team getting the player should have to stump up the points, just like F/s or nga

This - if they want them they pay for them, not the rest of the league.

 

[dergert]

Backing himself in it seems.

 

[RedWhite&Blue]

Harmes has agreed to terms on a 3 year deal

well we have our new whipping boy - he runs around with that rubbery head and doesn't get a kick.
Really shit pick-up.

 

[Cudi]

Backing himself in it seems.

Why is Edmund being so dramatic haha

 

[Foxman98]

Backing himself in it seems.

More a wait and see on Schultz hence he wants to time stamp it for "as or right now"