Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 6 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
TOP PICKS ON TABLE
St Kilda looms as a target for clubs looking to slide back or trade up the board after the Saints nabbed pick No.8 for their Josh Battle free agency compensation, giving them picks No.7 and 8.
If we bid, do Brisbane trade next years picks, futures, into this year's so they get the points? And say ashcroft is selected by us would he be upset it went down that way?Brisbane cannot currently match a bid on Ashcroft at pick 1.
Their points total is 1089 and the max deficit is 1167.
They will need at least an additional 730 to match a bid on Marshall if it is top 20.
There is absolutely no reason for us not to bid on Ashcroft at pick 1 unless we are being adequately compensated. Ashcroft is born in December and still equally as good as any other number 1. His brother just won a norm smith.
If we bid it eliminates a shitload of draft picks. It also potentially means Marshall doesn’t get matched which means all picks after him go up 1 position in value, if course we could be the ones to take Marshall.
So other than their first and future first, which young gun do we want? Coleman?
Nah, they'll cough up. They're desperate.I wouldn't be shocked if Freo decide that they'll keep their picks and go for Matt Owies instead. Farking losers. Shit club never won anything and never will as they're softcocks.
HowBrisbane will trade into enough points to cover a bid at 1 before the draft.
No idea. But surely they’ll find away.How
Love to see your example of how they do this
Not sure picks 15,16 & 21 (GWS) get picks 2 or 3.GWS will trade for 2 or 3, book it. Saints will be interested too
That's cos they're smart. This is the worst year in history for the number 1 pick ever. The media likened it to Raynors year but that was universally down to Raynor or Mcluggage. This year could be out of 6- 8 players. Smillie was no. 1 now tanking. FOS hasn't lifted. Jaggas a bloody accumulator with lousy skills. Hilarious how Hotton still rated 10 on back of long term injury. Who bloody knows who'll be the picks of the litter, and who bloody knows if Toce is a gun or a lazy appointment a la Louie Meehan. Our next 10 years is gonna be predicated by this draft. The 5 from the 2021 top 30 haul haven't set the world on fire.
No Chance they have pick #20 which is not going to get them enough for pick bid before #5No idea. But surely they’ll find away.
Raynor and McCluggage were different years.
We should just give them picks 41 and 72 for pick 2.
Brisbane cannot currently match a bid on Ashcroft at pick 1.
Their points total is 1089 and the max deficit is 1167.
They will need at least an additional 730 to match a bid on Marshall if it is top 20.
There is absolutely no reason for us not to bid on Ashcroft at pick 1 unless we are being adequately compensated. Ashcroft is born in December and still equally as good as any other number 1. His brother just won a norm smith.
If we bid it eliminates a shitload of draft picks. It also potentially means Marshall doesn’t get matched which means all picks after him go up 1 position in value, if course we could be the ones to take Marshall.
So other than their first and future first, which young gun do we want? Coleman?
So what do they do? Gentlemen’s handshake with clubs holding picks 1-5?No Chance they have pick #20 which is not going to get them enough for pick bid before #5
WE MUST TARGET MARSHALL
Pick #11 + Baker for pick #3 is the best Eagles will get for #3
#6 + #18 will get pick #2 if we decide thats how we play it
But i would be wanting to hold #6 if we could
#1 , #2 , #3 , #6 , #21 , #22 would be a fantastic result if Blair could get that somehow
That would be perfect.Any chance we end up with picks 1, 2 and 3?
Crazy by West Coast so couldn’t see it. Seems fair on both sides but slows the rebuild.Absolutely
WC future 1st is a top 5 pick so a slight upgrade on 6
Bolton for 3 and Baker for 14
So 2024 1,3,14 and then we're likely to have 3-4 picks before 30 before we even move any of our later picks to trade up or into 2025
2025 likely we'd have pick 1 and 3 plus whatever else we traded in.
4x picks in the top 4 or consecutive drafts is elite
That's cos they're smart. This is the worst year in history for the number 1 pick ever. The media likened it to Raynors year but that was universally down to Raynor or Mcluggage. This year could be out of 6- 8 players. Smillie was no. 1 now tanking. FOS hasn't lifted. Jaggas a bloody accumulator with lousy skills. Hilarious how Hotton still rated 10 on back of long term injury. Who bloody knows who'll be the picks of the litter, and who bloody knows if Toce is a gun or a lazy appointment a la Louie Meehan. Our next 10 years is gonna be predicated by this draft. The 5 from the 2021 top 30 haul haven't set the world on fire.
Spot on - except I definitely wouldn't give 29 back to WC.Idealy we get #10 & #11 for Bolton with salary 25%
#6 + #20 for Rioli with #39 going back and salary %25%
#14 for Baker with #29 going back
#19 for #41,47,57,66
Baker + #11 for #3 would be a good result
Any chance we end up with picks 1, 2 and 3?
GWS will trade for 2 or 3, book it. Saints will be interested too