List Mgmt. Trade & Free Agency talk Pt 4

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Doesn't work like that. If Chol goes someone replaces him on the list and therefore his $ goes to that player
That player could be out 4th rnd pick on 70k instead of Chol on 300k
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Gold Coast hold picks #19 , #24

North have pick #1 , #20

Hoping Cj stays but if he leaves it would make more sense for him to go to Gold Coast with the list they have
Chol to get offered 5 years at $1 million a year from North - He is their big FISH
Where he wants to live will be more persuading, let’s hope lockdown is shitting him
 
If CCJ and Chol both go the best result would be.

CCJ to Gold Coast as we will get a better trade.

Chol to North as they will offer more money so we will get better compensation. Trade the Chol pick to upgrade a pick or trade it for a future pick to work towards another year of having a strong draft hand.

If we lose both I would want us to try and recruit Ricardi from GWS. Wouldn’t cost much either and as a forward I actually think he is a better fit for our game plan than Chol and CCJ and a better replacement for Jack (not that Jack can be replaced)
 
I think we might see a bit of a change in strategy if Chol and CCJ chose to leave, where we might not look at a refresh, but rather look at an actual rebuild.
 
Diff players , do not underestimate shai , watch last years finals highlights, can play , what the cats would give for players like that in clutch games

agreed they are but let’s not
Pretend Trac isnt a far better player and i think most will agree when their careers end, Trac will widely regarded as a much better player.
Anyway I didn’t compare them,
Someone else did. Haha
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

I am resigned to losing 1 of them, but we seriously can't afford to lose both. Jack has one year left and Lynch is approaching 30 with a bad injury history so probably won't age too well. If we lose chol and ccj, after jack and lynch we have .... who? Can't let it happen
Yea it’s not ideal but could happen, I reckon we’d be mad not to get weiderman would be very good replacement for CCJ, a r2 would do it
 
agreed they are but let’s not
Pretend Trac isnt a far better player and i think most will agree when their careers end, Trac will widely regarded as a much better player.
Anyway I didn’t compare them,
Someone else did. Haha
I wouldn't say far better at all. Shai is silky, I find Petracca a bit messy with his disposal. He finds plenty of it and has a great burst, but a bit dangerfield like with sloppy disposal.
Shai is just as dynamic, although he is less powerful as Petracca, but what he lacks in power, he makes up for in different ways I.e his leap, forward craft and silkiness.
If shai gets an equal amount of time on the ball as to what petracca gets, I think he would easily be an equal to Petracca if not better.
 
I wouldn't say far better at all. Shai is silky, I find Petracca a bit messy with his disposal. He finds plenty of it and has a great burst, but a bit dangerfield like with sloppy disposal.
Shai is just as dynamic, although he is less powerful as Petracca, but what he lacks in power, he makes up for in different ways I.e his leap, forward craft and silkiness.
If shai gets an equal amount of time on the ball as to what petracca gets, I think he would easily be an equal to Petracca if not better.

I feel as though that is a very bias take.

Petracca is in the top 5 players in the comp for me and the closest thing to Dusty. Shai is good but he is no where near Petracca’s level.
 
You know, he’s managed by Ralph Carr who generally wants his players to stay at their club if offered a fair deal. He won’t demand overs so I’d keep him IF CCJ were to walk, but I don’t think CCJ will
Well if it was a choice on keeping either and the decision came down to money.l know who'd I keep
 
I wouldn't say far better at all. Shai is silky, I find Petracca a bit messy with his disposal. He finds plenty of it and has a great burst, but a bit dangerfield like with sloppy disposal.
Shai is just as dynamic, although he is less powerful as Petracca, but what he lacks in power, he makes up for in different ways I.e his leap, forward craft and silkiness.
If shai gets an equal amount of time on the ball as to what petracca gets, I think he would easily be an equal to Petracca if not better.
You would build a team around Trac. You couldn’t around Shai

Trac is light years ahead and I love Bolton
 
We should trade chol/CCJ for top picks in next years draft so we secure a strong hand next year regardless of ladder position.

By all means trade chol to anyone who wants him; he is never going to make it at Richmond.

CCJ is our next full forward unless we get someone via FA. We need to get our heads around this. We are too far down the road development wise to escape it.
 
I feel as though that is a very bias take.

Petracca is in the top 5 players in the comp for me and the closest thing to Dusty. Shai is good but he is no where near Petracca’s level.
Maybe it is bias, Petracca isn't top 5 for mine though.
I find him more like Danger. They both burst out of stoppages and look like they are always in fast forward and don't slow to use the ball. Dusty finds space/time or makes space/time and is a far better user of the ball.

Also given Shai doesn't get the opportunities on ball that Petracca gets, it's a bit harsh on Shai. I feel his ceiling is just as high as Petracca's. I'm not saying he is at the level yet, I believe he can definitely get there though.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top