Is Weideman contracted?More importantly, if that's the cost of Weideman then it demonstrates clearly Ratugolea is a 4th rounder.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Is Weideman contracted?More importantly, if that's the cost of Weideman then it demonstrates clearly Ratugolea is a 4th rounder.
I agree with this, it's just so typical of Geelong, the beneficiaries of so many people players for so little year on year, they're playing handball with a fringe player it's irritating.Yeah the thing with Ratugolea isn't necessarily that he is worth a first rounder, its that Geelong have invested in him and don't want to lose him. He has a contract with them, they see him having potential, so if you want to break that you have to pay overs.
Its a very different situation to say JHF where at this point its hard to see him ever having a positive impact at Norf. Ratugolea could absolutely stay long-term at the Cats.
Yeah the thing with Ratugolea isn't necessarily that he is worth a first rounder, its that Geelong have invested in him and don't want to lose him. He has a contract with them, they see him having potential, so if you want to break that you have to pay overs.
Its a very different situation to say JHF where at this point its hard to see him ever having a positive impact at Norf. Ratugolea could absolutely stay long-term at the Cats.
Can anyone rationally explain why we didn't get an extra motion to trade our future first and second? I mean, we've used 7 first rd picks in the last 4 years, we're targeting a 19 year old with the pick so it's hardly a case of trading away our future... It just doesn't make sense.
Yeah sure, we finish last next year and it looks like a monumental stuff-up which is probably the AFL reasoning, but surely the chances of that happening are slim enough that we should be afforded to take on the risk.
If we become so bad the AFL can always just give us a priority pick right?
You would think what is in our favour here is we are trading them to a basketcase, so saves the AFL having to give more priority picks (they hope)Trading 4 potential quality picks over 2 years for one asset is incredibly risky. Its the AFL saving clubs from itself
Cue frenzied Adelaide Media cycle
That would be great, but the afl is not letting us announce until Wednesday just before 7pm CDSTCan we get JHF done now to steal their thunder?
TWO genuine rucks…would that change our planning at all?
Coffee with Gil.How are the tigers one of a few clubs hearing about this. Surely everyone needs to know what’s going on to plan accordingly? Or is this another case of the right connections Gives you an advantage?
TWO genuine rucks…would that change our planning at all?
While I don't doubt the AFL has had some influence in delaying this one for news purposes, I think this gets done a reasonable time before deadline such that all parties can on-trade picks received for other deals.That would be great, but the afl is not letting us announce until Wednesday just before 7pm CDST
Hope that you are right.While I don't doubt the AFL has had some influence in delaying this one for news purposes, I think this gets done a reasonable time before deadline such that all parties can on-trade picks received for other deals.
Hope that you are right.