How the AFL signed off on this is beyond belief.
Watch them "reflect" in a couple of months and decide it's no longer allowed.
Watch them "reflect" in a couple of months and decide it's no longer allowed.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Worth a Rookie Pick IMO
They stared us down.Bowes will be a depth player at Geelong. GC have basically traded pick #7 for ~50 next year, to the reigning premiers of all teams. Just declare the GC experiment a failure and shut up shop already, but they won't because they prop up the Vic clubs (same with the Giants).
So GC
Trades pick 7 to Geelong for nothing.
Trades Bowes to Geelong for pick 50.
Trades pick 11 to Geelong for pick 27, to draft Sharp, who they are now looking to offload.
Give GC a FA pick to get Rankine, who then leaves (though at market price of course).
How long until Anderson/Rowell end up at Geelong?
Maybe they shouldn't have recruited Atkins and they could afford him.Guess the $1.6M (over 2 yrs) off GC's TPP should be mentioned but what a layer of floaters they are.
Probably could have paid overs to have kept Rankine tooMaybe they shouldn't have recruited Atkins and they could afford him.
Ollie Henry. Maybe Tom Mitchell.So Dunkley is basically the only trade left? Maybe Lobb and JOM?
Dunkley and Hopper probably the two that go down to the wire
For sure if we are allowed 5 on the bench. Assuming one is Injury sub
So GC
Trades pick 7 to Geelong for nothing.
Trades Bowes to Geelong for pick 50.
Trades pick 11 to Geelong for pick 27, to draft Sharp, who they are now looking to offload.
Give GC a FA pick to get Rankine, who then leaves (though at market price of course).
How long until Anderson/Rowell end up at Geelong?
Think the AFL have succumbed again to the Coach's, and the 5th will simply be another interchange .....recycling policies gets me giddyFor sure if we are allowed 5 on the bench. Assuming one is Injury sub
YesFor those that were around for it - would you say this is more of a disgrace than the Veale Deal?
then wait for the call that it's unfair if someone goes off injured, and we will have the injury sub again in 2 years time.Think the AFL have succumbed again to the Coach's, and the 5th will simply be another interchange .....recycling policies gets me giddy
Then maybe they can just have 5 on the interchange and even limit the number of interchanges more... we've seen this sub rule long enough to know its not good for anyone, the players or the spectators....then wait for the call that it's unfair if someone goes off injured, and we will have the injury sub again in 2 years time.
I don't think any club would be paying 800k+ for Hopper that's what it would take to get band 1 these days.dumb by gws. They could have got a top 3 pick next year if they held
For those that were around for it - would you say this is more of a disgrace than the Veale Deal?
richmond offered 750 it would be closeI don't think any club would be paying 800k+ for Hopper that's what it would take to get band 1 these days.