Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
More than 1.7 million households say they will not turn on their heating this winter, according to research by comparison site Uswitch. This has risen sharply from the 972,000 who said they took this drastic step last year.
If the means testing is badly done, this is a bad outcome, I agree.The research reported that 55% of households cited rising living costs as the reason they would hold out on heating their homes, while a quarter of pensioners put it down to the loss of winter fuel payments, despite it being a potential health risk.
We all know who he meant"Jailing of political dissidents."
Who?
It's full of bot votes. Paid for by Farage supporting rich people and/or state actors (Russia). Because Starmer isn't conservative enough.This petition should be a major wake up call to Starmer that governing like a conservative is not going to win him popularity amongst the people. He needs to invest in the people and address the cost of living or he'll suffer the same fate as Biden. A good start would be embracing the agenda he advocated when standing for the Labour leadership, before he quickly abandoned it on achieving the position.
This petition should be a major wake up call to Starmer that governing like a conservative is not going to win him popularity amongst the people. He needs to invest in the people and address the cost of living or he'll suffer the same fate as Biden. A good start would be embracing the agenda he advocated when standing for the Labour leadership, before he quickly abandoned it on achieving the position.
Anyway Todman - Why not have a go at Starmer over his support for Israel?
Silly petition going on at the moment, flooded with bots. "2 million signed!"
Crazy that many petition replies are on about Starmer having a "four year term". Bots that don't know that the UK terms are not 4 years - that's the US.
Similar to the Facebook bots that are shown to be based in Nigeria and ads and Twitter memberships paid for from Nigerian accounts.
It's a ****ing mess.
From Russia With Likes: Nigel Farage Dominates Social Media During General Election – Boosted by Bots Stoking Racism
The Reform Party is hovering around 18% of the vote, yet Farage's and his party's Facebook posts generated six times more reactions and shares than either Labour or the Conservatives and their leadersbylinetimes.com
The ABC had to take this up:
An analysis of “foreign interference in the UK election” by the Australian Broadcast Corporation found five apparently UK-based Facebook pages, supporting ‘Patriotic UK’ to ‘BeyondBorders UK’, – ‘Commonsense Britain’, ‘British Patriots’ and ‘BritBlend’ – were run by administrators mostly based in Nigeria and with Facebook ads paid for using Nigerian currency.
Following on from analysis by ITV and Cardiff University that suspicious accounts ‘with Nigerian following’ being used to push pro-Reform UK content on TikTok, ABC’s security experts concluded that the Facebook networks they had detected “had the hallmarks of a Russian influence operation”.
I am sure the billionaires you are touting for will reward you for your service.Who are the 2 million demanding a general election? Crunching viral petition numbers
Starmer insists he’s ‘not surprised’ by election petition with two million signatures as he rules out another votewww.independent.co.uk
Petition: Call a General Election
I would like there to be another General Election. I believe the current Labour Government have gone back on the promises they laid out in the lead up to the last election.petition.parliament.uk
Over 2.8 Million now. Even if full of Russian bots there is still many legitimate signatures.
The government must respond to all petitions with over 10,000 signatures, and petitions reaching 100,000 signatures are considered before parliament.
He said: “Look, I remind myself that very many people didn’t vote Labour at the last election.
“I am not surprised many of them want a re-run.”
"Forcing citizens to freeze."
Means-testing a pensioner subsidy and taking it away from people who can well afford it is not forcing anyone to freeze.
Rampant resource and food markets capitalising on shortages to maximise profit is forcing people to freeze, or seek shelter at community venues like village halls.
1.7m UK households won’t turn heating on this winter, research finds
More than half of households cite rising living costs as reason for not heating homes, while quarter of pensioners blame loss of winter fuel paymentswww.theguardian.com
If the means testing is badly done, this is a bad outcome, I agree.
But Stalinist? To REDUCE government subsidies? That were needed due to free markets capitalising on shortages?
Ironically, global warming's effects on global climate systems will see UK temperatures drop.
Means testing a subsidy isn't a big deal IMO.It’s obviously not “Stalinist” but it is outrageous, saw a major split in the party (that Starmer exacerbated) as it hurt ordinary people. People didn’t elect Starmer to double down on austerity, and whatever issues you may have with the petition, every poll says that no government has been so unpopular so quickly, with most now putting the Tories ahead or even and that they preferred Sunak to Starmer.
Obviously I don’t think people should switch to the conservatives - I really don’t know why the various suspended Labour MPs and progressive independents don’t start their own party to do to Labour what Reform did to the Conservatives. But he’s a shocker.
Are the opinion polls full of bot votes? They're pretty poor for Starmer. The US election was also not kind to a "centre-left" party attempting to be moderate conservatives. Nor are the Australian polls.It's full of bot votes. Paid for by Farage supporting rich people and/or state actors (Russia). Because Starmer isn't conservative enough.
The problem with means-testing a program is that many who miss out see it as being something they're okay with cutting because they have no skin in the game. Programs that are open to all may benefit some people who don't need it, but sometimes that's a price worth paying to ensure a program is popular among the public, making it harder for anyone to cut in future. This is why programs like Steven Miles' 50c public transport fares were political gold in electorates with high public transport use.Means testing a subsidy isn't a big deal IMO.
The very idea of means testing a subsidy is so people who can well afford to pay their bills aren't subsidised. If it has been mis-targeted and people in need have lost out, that's bad. It needs review.
This part is true, but centre-left leaders need to show courage and be willing to use their political capital on progressive policies, regardless of the inevitable media criticism. Otherwise, what's the point of electing the centre-left, other than the conservatives being worse? I don't want society to be less worse, I want it to be better.But of course it was never going to work either way. Nobs at News etc would just accuse Starmer of waste if he DIDN'T means test it.
You're missing the point, which is that Starmer has squandered his popularity and political capital in record time. This should tell him to do something different.Opinion polls are not a petition to re-do an election they didn't like, despite there being no mechanism for this except maybe if the King is swayed by the petition. Is that likely to happen?
Given that he has a rabid right-wing Farage backed by billionaires spamming the web with their trash, I'm surprised he got in at all.You're missing the point, which is that Starmer has squandered his popularity and political capital in record time. This should tell him to do something different.
Means testing a subsidy isn't a big deal IMO.
The very idea of means testing a subsidy is so people who can well afford to pay their bills aren't subsidised. If it has been mis-targeted and people in need have lost out, that's bad. It needs review.
But of course it was never going to work either way. Nobs at News etc would just accuse Starmer of waste if he DIDN'T means test it.
Given that he has a rabid right-wing Farage backed by billionaires spamming the web with their trash, I'm surprised he got in at all.
Can't argue with that.He got in because he was the lucky person there at the right time when the Tories collapsed. He chose to be a cowardly friend of capital and declared war on the previous leadership group of the party with the support of the rabid right who nonetheless won’t support him anyway. In the process he’s allowed the Tories to come back into the prime position to govern when they should by all rights be out for generations.
He absolutely pissed it in on the back of the Conservatives being incompetent. And I'd have much more sympathy for this argument if the parts of the party who backed Starmer hadn't white-anted Jeremy Corbyn instead of defending him against the rabid right wing backed by billionaires.Given that he has a rabid right-wing Farage backed by billionaires spamming the web with their trash, I'm surprised he got in at all.