I just hope US aid gets passed soon
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Yes, Russia hoping that attacking for like the 37th time will surprise.Visions it seems Vuhledar is back in the news.
View attachment 1844866
View attachment 1844867
View attachment 1844865
(videos compressed where necessary)
All from Denys Davydov's TG channel ocer a couple of links. [link] [link]
Edit: Might be closer to Mykilsk' which is one village to the east of Vuhledar.
Yes, Russia hoping that attacking for like the 37th time will surprise.
Unless there is a major change in European & US involvement; Ukraine will be bled dry. Slowly and over a few years but bled dry none the less.
Zaluzhny: War with Russia moving to a new stage
Ukraine stopped a much stronger enemy, but now the war is moving to a new stage. â Ukrinform.www.ukrinform.net
“The war is now moving to a new stage: what we in the military call ‘positional’ warfare of static and attritional fighting, as in the first world war, in contrast to the ‘manoeuvre’ warfare of movement and speed. This will benefit Russia, allowing it to rebuild its military power, eventually threatening Ukraine’s armed forces and the state itself,” Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine Valeriy Zaluzhny told The Economist.
""Weapons supplied by the West were enough to support Ukraine in the war,** but not enough to win. This war cannot** be won with the weapons of the previous generation and outdated methods."
NEwS articles on Wagner wanting to provide hezbollah with pantsir s1 air defence systems. Sorry I'm on a train so can't link. Wagner = prigozhins son in case you're wondering.
On SM-A146P using BigFooty.com mobile app
The war can only be won by opening a new front behind their lines; Providing overwhelming missile/bombs/explosives; OR the collapse of the Russian government. Nothing else will do.
The war can only be won by opening a new front behind their lines; Providing overwhelming missile/bombs/explosives; OR the collapse of the Russian government. Nothing else will do.
Which media?The media recently was going with the narrative NATO and US stockpiles are getting low.
Which media?
Do you believe this to be the case?
South Korea by itself could probably keep Ukraine going for years.The Australian Naval Institute. breakingdefense.com. CNN. BBC. Nytimes. Etc .
I have no idea as to the UN/US weapons stock pile situation
This war has been going on since 2014.""Weapons supplied by the West were enough to support Ukraine in the war,** but not enough to win. This war cannot** be won with the weapons of the previous generation and outdated methods."
Two articles published this week give a stark assessment of Ukraine’s prospects in its war with Russia. One – by the commander in chief of the Ukrainian military – admits the battlefield has reached a stalemate and a long attritional war benefiting Moscow beckons. The other portrays Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky as exhausted by the constant effort to cajole and persuade allies to keep the faith.
Which media?
Do you believe this to be the case?
This was a true report, but described in terms of upping production as a result of crunching the numbers. I believe any shortage on what is sent to Ukraine is not due to a shortage in stock, but due to the supposed allies playing funny buggers.The media recently was going with the narrative NATO and US stockpiles are getting low.
A long time bugbear of mine - feels like nobody wants to help Ukraine, but everybody wants to show off to their buddies at their summits that they are helping Ukraine.""Weapons supplied by the West were enough to support Ukraine in the war,** but not enough to win. This war cannot** be won with the weapons of the previous generation and outdated methods."
This was a true report, but described in terms of upping production as a result of crunching the numbers. I believe any shortage on what is sent to Ukraine is not due to a shortage in stock, but due to the supposed allies playing funny buggers.
There was a really interesting point way back then when it was discussed (I think on the Telegraph podcast) is that the contractors who produce armaments need security if they are going to expand production for a request. That security is a longer contract for whatever other purposes. So if you go to "We Make Missles Pty Ltd" and say we need 300% what youre making now, they say back "well then we need 10 years of commitment to buy" and then "Buyingmissilesland" goes back and works out what other things they can shunt around so that "We Make Missiles Pty Ltd" has a long-term contract. Elsewise they will build a new factory for 1 or 2 years at a cost equal to the income that factory will bring them, and then have a massive white elephant. Which makes them sound like an Olympic village in a way i dunno. And they are pissed off so they'd not take the contract in the first place.
A long time bugbear of mine - feels like nobody wants to help Ukraine, but everybody wants to show off to their buddies at their summits that they are helping Ukraine.
Moscow could have been a massive hole in the ground right now.
Well, it was a hyperbolic and flippant comment borne of my anger at the bureacracy behind western support. I know people in Moscow and I don't really want them to die.You don't think, from a Russian perspective. The west gets nuked to smithereens if Moscow starts to become a hole in the ground?
What's the point of six thousand nuclear weapons if you allow your capital to become a hole.
I read those posts and couldn’t see anything in there.
Where is a specific section of the report that says what you said it does?
From my memory AI said that Ukraine were setting up defensive positions in community areas which increased the risk of civilian casualty. Which Ukraine was doing. Ukraine were arguing that there wasn’t enough context in that assertion, given you know “hey we are being invaded”.
I read it as AI were correct, but they just didn’t give enough acknowledgement to the challenging position Ukraine are in.
Thanks Mobbs and please don’t think I’m trying to discredit you as I like your posts.Got involved in discussions about Amnesty International and the events re Ukraine late last year, while commenting on another thread where their assessments are involved. I've been asked to expand on the accusations against them, but I'm a bit seedy from a Saturday so this might be slow going.
I had mentioned the first links i could find to AI re Ukraine which were their own statement when they backed down (in some eyes argued there had been misunderstanding) Repeated here : [Statement re response to article on UKR tactics] [Resignation of Ukrainian AI rep]
I was quiite fairly told that on the face of the first article there isn't a lot to see. The second link did not get any traction. Need to reverse research and found posts from our own awesome community here on the War In Ukraine thread(s):
Europe - War in Ukraine - Thread 2
This is a sensitive area for some. With that in mind, I'm going to remind a few posters a few things: personal attacks are against forum rules. From this point, any attacks that are directed at another poster will be treated with a warning, then infractions and threadbans if it continues. the...www.bigfooty.com
Europe - War in Ukraine - Thread 2
This is a sensitive area for some. With that in mind, I'm going to remind a few posters a few things: personal attacks are against forum rules. From this point, any attacks that are directed at another poster will be treated with a warning, then infractions and threadbans if it continues. the...www.bigfooty.com
Europe - War in Ukraine - Thread 2
This is a sensitive area for some. With that in mind, I'm going to remind a few posters a few things: personal attacks are against forum rules. From this point, any attacks that are directed at another poster will be treated with a warning, then infractions and threadbans if it continues. the...www.bigfooty.com
Europe - War in Ukraine - Thread 2
This is a sensitive area for some. With that in mind, I'm going to remind a few posters a few things: personal attacks are against forum rules. From this point, any attacks that are directed at another poster will be treated with a warning, then infractions and threadbans if it continues. the...www.bigfooty.com
Europe - War in Ukraine - Thread 2
This is a sensitive area for some. With that in mind, I'm going to remind a few posters a few things: personal attacks are against forum rules. From this point, any attacks that are directed at another poster will be treated with a warning, then infractions and threadbans if it continues. the...www.bigfooty.com
Jello_B asked the following:
So I've repasted all this over here as it can derail the other thread. Be aware I have a hangover and pretty grumpy! But for the sake of any chance for an argument on the internet, I'll give my recollections but might have to source backup links later.
So what Jello says is correct - AI commented that Ukraine used tactics that involved placement of troops in residential areas in a report. Ukraine weren't keen and among their challenges said there it was not differentiation between these tactics as an invaded defender and these tactics as an invading aggressor.
From memory the other issues included :
- Their (AI's) own department in Kyiv had not included in producing the assessment, indeed nobody in Ukraine had been included at all.
- No on the ground data collection happened. Everything was based on reports which Ukraine denounced as circumstancial evidence and second-hand claims.
- The report made no clear match-up versus that for Russia which caused it to appear very equalised, despite the numbers in the data having massive ratio disparity (I have no memory of the numbers, I guess I'll keep google busy today).
Based on the above there were fears that Russia would use it for propaganda traction. Instantly it was actually brought to the forefront
Finally regarding the statements about Ukraine using villages to house their defensive positions. I remember one guy on this thread summed it up (or maybe quoted Kuleba or someone) perfectly at the time, but I can't rememeber who. Along the lines of Russia comes and attacks our village, do we go in and fight back, or do park ourselved 3k to the right and say hey Russia can you please move the conflict to this field?
So basically everywhere says "AI got it wrong" (a google search will confirm this). I say someone got into someone's pocket (this is my opinion).
~ ~ ~
Last point: I also did research claims of one specific incident where I think Ukraine might have broken conventions and endangered civilians. It was in the town of Stary Krasnyanka (near Lisichansk) where from memory they set up camp in an old folks home to defend against RF, and the residents were still there. The residents potentially had plenty of time to be evacuated and its belief that Ukraine ****ed up here. I can find a link if its of interest. I had found 3 potential war crimes by Ukraine at that point - and I used this ensure transparency every time I called Russia a terrorist nation for its 1000s of war crimes.
Phew, lot of typing for a Sunday morning. I'll try to keep looking into more articles.
No worries whenever I see you replied to me I expect a solid question!Thanks Mobbs and please don’t think I’m trying to discredit you as I like your posts.
My thoughts are simple-
Ukraine have been doing what they can to survive, maybe they took advantage of civilians as cover
AI reported on it
Ukraine got pissed, like hey, look what Russia are doing and you’re reporting on us
Both sides use the AI reporting to their own advantage
Overall I think we can perceive AI to be unbiased - if they were just reporting one way which is what Israel and Ukraine (the teams on the wests side) want, or vice versa, then I’d have them being more biased. The reality is both sides in a war do shitty stuff and it should be reported.
Good luck recovering from the hangover