Europe War in Ukraine - Thread 3

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Visions it seems Vuhledar is back in the news.
View attachment 1844866
View attachment 1844867
View attachment 1844865
(videos compressed where necessary)

All from Denys Davydov's TG channel ocer a couple of links. [link] [link]

Edit: Might be closer to Mykilsk' which is one village to the east of Vuhledar.
Yes, Russia hoping that attacking for like the 37th time will surprise.

72nd mech brigade doing some good work down there destroying the orcs and keeping them at bay.

 

Log in to remove this ad.

Unless there is a major change in European & US involvement; Ukraine will be bled dry. Slowly and over a few years but bled dry none the less.


“The war is now moving to a new stage: what we in the military call ‘positional’ warfare of static and attritional fighting, as in the first world war, in contrast to the ‘manoeuvre’ warfare of movement and speed. This will benefit Russia, allowing it to rebuild its military power, eventually threatening Ukraine’s armed forces and the state itself,” Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine Valeriy Zaluzhny told The Economist.

""Weapons supplied by the West were enough to support Ukraine in the war,** but not enough to win. This war cannot** be won with the weapons of the previous generation and outdated methods."
 
""Weapons supplied by the West were enough to support Ukraine in the war,** but not enough to win. This war cannot** be won with the weapons of the previous generation and outdated methods."

The war can only be won by opening a new front behind their lines; Providing overwhelming missile/bombs/explosives; OR the collapse of the Russian government. Nothing else will do.
 
NEwS articles on Wagner wanting to provide hezbollah with pantsir s1 air defence systems. Sorry I'm on a train so can't link. Wagner = prigozhins son in case you're wondering.

On SM-A146P using BigFooty.com mobile app

Russia providing advanced SAM systems to rebel groups in areas where commercial airlines operate. What could possibly go wrong?

SA-12 missiles have a range up to 100kms. They could easily shoot down commercial airline traffic in Israel airspace or even international airspace over the Mediterranean either deliberately or by mistake.


Russia providing these to Hezbollah would be outrageous really.
 
The war can only be won by opening a new front behind their lines; Providing overwhelming missile/bombs/explosives; OR the collapse of the Russian government. Nothing else will do.

Absolutely. A blitz of F16s, ATACMS and advanced drones is needed on Kerch bridge and supply lines from Russia to Ukraine through Donbas.

Combine this with troops from Baltics, Romania, Poland & Moldova fighting alongside Ukranians to protect their countries and a victory would be very achievable.


We are surely past the stage of worrying about whether Putin is upset. His threats are more empty than Freo's trophy cabinet.
 
The war can only be won by opening a new front behind their lines; Providing overwhelming missile/bombs/explosives; OR the collapse of the Russian government. Nothing else will do.

The media recently was going with the narrative NATO and US stockpiles are getting low.
 
The Australian Naval Institute. breakingdefense.com. CNN. BBC. Nytimes. Etc .

I have no idea as to the UN/US weapons stock pile situation
South Korea by itself could probably keep Ukraine going for years.

It has a policy this far of not directly supplying material to Ukraine, but an easy around is to supply the US. US gets new inventory from SK, supplies Ukraine from it's old stock.

On moto g(6) plus using BigFooty.com mobile app
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Two articles published this week give a stark assessment of Ukraine’s prospects in its war with Russia. One – by the commander in chief of the Ukrainian military – admits the battlefield has reached a stalemate and a long attritional war benefiting Moscow beckons. The other portrays Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky as exhausted by the constant effort to cajole and persuade allies to keep the faith.

 
The media recently was going with the narrative NATO and US stockpiles are getting low.
This was a true report, but described in terms of upping production as a result of crunching the numbers. I believe any shortage on what is sent to Ukraine is not due to a shortage in stock, but due to the supposed allies playing funny buggers.

There was a really interesting point way back then when it was discussed (I think on the Telegraph podcast) is that the contractors who produce armaments need security if they are going to expand production for a request. That security is a longer contract for whatever other purposes. So if you go to "We Make Missles Pty Ltd" and say we need 300% what youre making now, they say back "well then we need 10 years of commitment to buy" and then "Buyingmissilesland" goes back and works out what other things they can shunt around so that "We Make Missiles Pty Ltd" has a long-term contract. Elsewise they will build a new factory for 1 or 2 years at a cost equal to the income that factory will bring them, and then have a massive white elephant. Which makes them sound like an Olympic village in a way i dunno. And they are pissed off so they'd not take the contract in the first place.

""Weapons supplied by the West were enough to support Ukraine in the war,** but not enough to win. This war cannot** be won with the weapons of the previous generation and outdated methods."
A long time bugbear of mine - feels like nobody wants to help Ukraine, but everybody wants to show off to their buddies at their summits that they are helping Ukraine.

Moscow could have been a massive hole in the ground right now.
 
Suicide bombers attack Kharkiv.
Kharkov was attacked by about 10 suicide bombers. A service station and cars were on fire, the building where displaced people lived was destroyed, an educational institution was damaged, - the prosecutor's office

All services are on site, there is no information about casualties. Meanwhile, Russia is attacking the western part of Ukraine with suicide bombers. Air defense has already worked in the Lviv region.
[Denys Davydov TG link]

photo_2023-11-03_12-15-56.jpg

Ok so he writes about suicide bombers in Kharkiv (eastern Ukraine), then also says suicide bombers were attacking western Ukraine, then says air defense was in action responding, in Lviv (western Ukraine)

This does not compute. Air defense does not kick in for suicide bombers. So he means 1 of 2 things:
1. Kharkiv - suicide bombers. Lviv - rocket strikes.
or more likely imo:
2. Kharkiv and Lviv - kamikaze drones

One thing is sure, Denys is still learning english. He would be happy to have sayed that himself.
 
Last edited:
This was a true report, but described in terms of upping production as a result of crunching the numbers. I believe any shortage on what is sent to Ukraine is not due to a shortage in stock, but due to the supposed allies playing funny buggers.

There was a really interesting point way back then when it was discussed (I think on the Telegraph podcast) is that the contractors who produce armaments need security if they are going to expand production for a request. That security is a longer contract for whatever other purposes. So if you go to "We Make Missles Pty Ltd" and say we need 300% what youre making now, they say back "well then we need 10 years of commitment to buy" and then "Buyingmissilesland" goes back and works out what other things they can shunt around so that "We Make Missiles Pty Ltd" has a long-term contract. Elsewise they will build a new factory for 1 or 2 years at a cost equal to the income that factory will bring them, and then have a massive white elephant. Which makes them sound like an Olympic village in a way i dunno. And they are pissed off so they'd not take the contract in the first place.


A long time bugbear of mine - feels like nobody wants to help Ukraine, but everybody wants to show off to their buddies at their summits that they are helping Ukraine.

Moscow could have been a massive hole in the ground right now.

You don't think, from a Russian perspective. The west gets nuked to smithereens if Moscow starts to become a hole in the ground?

What's the point of six thousand nuclear weapons if you allow your capital to become a hole.

The policy is to nuke people if there is "mass destruction" against it which taking out Moscow would seemingly include.
 
You don't think, from a Russian perspective. The west gets nuked to smithereens if Moscow starts to become a hole in the ground?

What's the point of six thousand nuclear weapons if you allow your capital to become a hole.
Well, it was a hyperbolic and flippant comment borne of my anger at the bureacracy behind western support. I know people in Moscow and I don't really want them to die.

But there's a part of me that has no problem with the extinction of the human race if at least it means we went out finally trying to be decent animals for the first time in our history!
 
Got involved in discussions about Amnesty International and the events re Ukraine late last year, while commenting on another thread where their assessments are involved. I've been asked to expand on the accusations against them, but I'm a bit seedy from a Saturday so this might be slow going.

I had mentioned the first links i could find to AI re Ukraine which were their own statement when they backed down (in some eyes argued there had been misunderstanding) Repeated here : [Statement re response to article on UKR tactics] [Resignation of Ukrainian AI rep]

I was quiite fairly told that on the face of the first article there isn't a lot to see. The second link did not get any traction. Need to reverse research and found posts from our own awesome community here on the War In Ukraine thread(s):






Jello_B asked the following:
I read those posts and couldn’t see anything in there.
Where is a specific section of the report that says what you said it does?
From my memory AI said that Ukraine were setting up defensive positions in community areas which increased the risk of civilian casualty. Which Ukraine was doing. Ukraine were arguing that there wasn’t enough context in that assertion, given you know “hey we are being invaded”.
I read it as AI were correct, but they just didn’t give enough acknowledgement to the challenging position Ukraine are in.

So I've repasted all this over here as it can derail the other thread. Be aware I have a hangover and pretty grumpy! But for the sake of any chance for an argument on the internet, I'll give my recollections but might have to source backup links later.

So what Jello says is correct - AI commented that Ukraine used tactics that involved placement of troops in residential areas in a report. Ukraine weren't keen and among their challenges said there it was not differentiation between these tactics as an invaded defender and these tactics as an invading aggressor.

From memory the other issues included :
  • Their (AI's) own department in Kyiv had not included in producing the assessment, indeed nobody in Ukraine had been included at all.
  • No on the ground data collection happened. Everything was based on reports which Ukraine denounced as circumstancial evidence and second-hand claims.
  • The report made no clear match-up versus that for Russia which caused it to appear very equalised, despite the numbers in the data having massive ratio disparity (I have no memory of the numbers, I guess I'll keep google busy today).

Based on the above there were fears that Russia would use it for propaganda traction. Instantly it was actually brought to the forefront Edit: Forgot the Twitter [link]

Finally regarding the statements about Ukraine using villages to house their defensive positions. I remember one guy on this thread summed it up (or maybe quoted Kuleba or someone) perfectly at the time, but I can't rememeber who. Along the lines of Russia comes and attacks our village, do we go in and fight back, or do park ourselved 3k to the right and say hey Russia can you please move the conflict to this field?

So basically everywhere says "AI got it wrong" (a google search will confirm this). I say someone got into someone's pocket (this is my opinion).

~ ~ ~

Last point: I also did research claims of one specific incident where I think Ukraine might have broken conventions and endangered civilians. It was in the town of Stary Krasnyanka (near Lisichansk) where from memory they set up camp in an old folks home to defend against RF, and the residents were still there. The residents potentially had plenty of time to be evacuated and its belief that Ukraine ****ed up here. I can find a link if its of interest. I had found 3 potential war crimes by Ukraine at that point - and I used this ensure transparency every time I called Russia a terrorist nation for its 1000s of war crimes.

Phew, lot of typing for a Sunday morning. I'll try to keep looking into more articles.
 
Last edited:
Got involved in discussions about Amnesty International and the events re Ukraine late last year, while commenting on another thread where their assessments are involved. I've been asked to expand on the accusations against them, but I'm a bit seedy from a Saturday so this might be slow going.

I had mentioned the first links i could find to AI re Ukraine which were their own statement when they backed down (in some eyes argued there had been misunderstanding) Repeated here : [Statement re response to article on UKR tactics] [Resignation of Ukrainian AI rep]

I was quiite fairly told that on the face of the first article there isn't a lot to see. The second link did not get any traction. Need to reverse research and found posts from our own awesome community here on the War In Ukraine thread(s):






Jello_B asked the following:


So I've repasted all this over here as it can derail the other thread. Be aware I have a hangover and pretty grumpy! But for the sake of any chance for an argument on the internet, I'll give my recollections but might have to source backup links later.

So what Jello says is correct - AI commented that Ukraine used tactics that involved placement of troops in residential areas in a report. Ukraine weren't keen and among their challenges said there it was not differentiation between these tactics as an invaded defender and these tactics as an invading aggressor.

From memory the other issues included :
  • Their (AI's) own department in Kyiv had not included in producing the assessment, indeed nobody in Ukraine had been included at all.
  • No on the ground data collection happened. Everything was based on reports which Ukraine denounced as circumstancial evidence and second-hand claims.
  • The report made no clear match-up versus that for Russia which caused it to appear very equalised, despite the numbers in the data having massive ratio disparity (I have no memory of the numbers, I guess I'll keep google busy today).

Based on the above there were fears that Russia would use it for propaganda traction. Instantly it was actually brought to the forefront

Finally regarding the statements about Ukraine using villages to house their defensive positions. I remember one guy on this thread summed it up (or maybe quoted Kuleba or someone) perfectly at the time, but I can't rememeber who. Along the lines of Russia comes and attacks our village, do we go in and fight back, or do park ourselved 3k to the right and say hey Russia can you please move the conflict to this field?

So basically everywhere says "AI got it wrong" (a google search will confirm this). I say someone got into someone's pocket (this is my opinion).

~ ~ ~

Last point: I also did research claims of one specific incident where I think Ukraine might have broken conventions and endangered civilians. It was in the town of Stary Krasnyanka (near Lisichansk) where from memory they set up camp in an old folks home to defend against RF, and the residents were still there. The residents potentially had plenty of time to be evacuated and its belief that Ukraine ****ed up here. I can find a link if its of interest. I had found 3 potential war crimes by Ukraine at that point - and I used this ensure transparency every time I called Russia a terrorist nation for its 1000s of war crimes.

Phew, lot of typing for a Sunday morning. I'll try to keep looking into more articles.
Thanks Mobbs and please don’t think I’m trying to discredit you as I like your posts.
My thoughts are simple-
Ukraine have been doing what they can to survive, maybe they took advantage of civilians as cover
AI reported on it
Ukraine got pissed, like hey, look what Russia are doing and you’re reporting on us
Both sides use the AI reporting to their own advantage

Overall I think we can perceive AI to be unbiased - if they were just reporting one way which is what Israel and Ukraine (the teams on the wests side) want, or vice versa, then I’d have them being more biased. The reality is both sides in a war do shitty stuff and it should be reported.

Good luck recovering from the hangover:)
 
Thanks Mobbs and please don’t think I’m trying to discredit you as I like your posts.
My thoughts are simple-
Ukraine have been doing what they can to survive, maybe they took advantage of civilians as cover
AI reported on it
Ukraine got pissed, like hey, look what Russia are doing and you’re reporting on us
Both sides use the AI reporting to their own advantage

Overall I think we can perceive AI to be unbiased - if they were just reporting one way which is what Israel and Ukraine (the teams on the wests side) want, or vice versa, then I’d have them being more biased. The reality is both sides in a war do shitty stuff and it should be reported.

Good luck recovering from the hangover:)
No worries whenever I see you replied to me I expect a solid question!

Yes in a nutshell you're right, although it got curious when it was found most of their data was just basically stuff they read on the internet and reposted it. I mean who the heck does that!?
giphy.gif


Amusingly while googling just now I saw an article of Russia being pissed at Amnesty International only a few months earlier!

I'm happy to start entertaining that AI messed up on that occasion, and it doesn't mean they can have no credibility ever again. I can do that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top