Europe War in Ukraine - Thread 4 - thread rules updated

Remove this Banner Ad

This is the thread for discussing the War in Ukraine. Should you want to discuss the geopolitics, the history, or an interesting tangent, head over here:


If a post isn't directly concerning the events of the war or starts to derail the thread, report the post to us and we'll move it over there.

Seeing as multiple people seem to have forgotten, abuse is against the rules of BF. Continuous, page long attacks directed at a single poster in this thread will result in threadbans for a week from this point; doing so again once you have returned will make the bans permanent and will be escalated to infractions.

This thread still has misinformation rules, and occasionally you will be asked to demonstrate a claim you have made by moderation. If you cannot, you will be offered the opportunity to amend the post to reflect that it's opinion, to remove the post, or you will be threadbanned and infracted for sharing misinformation.

Addendum: from this point, use of any variant of the word 'orc' to describe combatants, politicians or russians in general will be deleted and the poster will receive a warning. If the behaviour continues, it will be escalated. Consider this fair warning.

Finally: If I see the word Nazi or Hitler being flung around, there had better have a good faith basis as to how it's applicable to the Russian invasion - as in, video/photographic evidence of POW camps designed to remove another ethnic group - or to the current Ukrainian army. If this does not occur, you will be threadbanned for posting off topic

This is a sensitive area, and I understand that this makes for fairly incensed conversation sometimes. This does not mean the rules do not apply, whether to a poster positing a Pro-Ukraine stance or a poster positing an alternative view.

Behave, people.
 
Last edited:
Sabotage




Aircraft jamming




Spies





How long until there is a mass casualty event in a NATO nation? If its Germany, they may well turn the other cheek, but France or Poland?
 
So what’s NATO’s “line in the sand” with russia?

There is no NATO line in the sand. Each member has its own threshold at which they seek to rely on article 5 and each member responds a request for aid by taking such action as that member deems necessary. One only has to look at German reluctance in Afghanistan to see the tensions that arise.

https://www.cmi.no/publications/file/4471-a-reluctant-warrior.pdf

 

Log in to remove this ad.


A video circulating on social media platforms X and Telegram purports to show an interview with a North Korean soldier who fought in the Battle of Kursk in Russia, claiming to be the only survivor of a small unit of 40 North Korean soldiers. Multiple sources are sharing the video, but BulgarianMilitary.com cannot independently verify its authenticity or the story of the alleged interviewee.

Meanwhile, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has confirmed that, as of yet, North Korean forces in Russia have not faced Ukrainian troops, nor have they been engaged in battle. President Zelensky stated, “To this date, North Korean forces have not participated in combat. They are preparing to join the fight [in Kursk],” dismissing media reports that North Korean and Ukrainian forces had already clashed and that North Korean soldiers had died in battle.
A lot more are going to die than that, and all because of 2 little in height mens ego
 
There is no NATO line in the sand. Each member has its own threshold at which they seek to rely on article 5 and each member responds a request for aid by taking such action as that member deems necessary. One only has to look at German reluctance in Afghanistan to see the tensions that arise.

https://www.cmi.no/publications/file/4471-a-reluctant-warrior.pdf

Yes, Germany’s operations in Afghanistan “were an effort to demonstrate military commitment while minimising risks for German soldiers.” So maybe a token effort.

Just like Afghanistan, in Ukraine NATO has ended up in a conflict without a real and detailed strategy. Also like Afghanistan the possible duration of the war in Ukraine is becoming a concern plus the possible entrance of a new US presidential administration is a real concern.
Perhaps the most significant example of NATO’s value is that they remained committed in Afghanistan over such a long period.
So even if they can’t decide on a “line in the sand” they need to remain committed in Ukraine over a long period.
 
Some nicer news out of Russia, they are planning to erect a massive monument to shaverma (a Russian take on gyros/souvlaki style wraps).
Personally, I've always wanted to try shaverma, it has been an out-of-reach exotic treat I've blathered about for years!

(image is a CG model based on the proposal, they did build it a couple months back but I ate that one so they have to build it again)

photo_2024-11-02_18-35-33.jpg
 
However, it is not known when exactly and in what quantity the transfer to Ukraine took place.

JDAMs are GPS-based equipment kits that transform simple free-fall bombs into all-weather, precision-guided munitions.
 

The V-BAT is a relatively large drone with a 500 km range. In horizontal mode, it can loiter over the target area for 10 hours. In contrast, kamikaze drones currently available with Ukrainian forces cannot fly beyond 100 km and have a loiter time of 10 to 15 minutes.
 

The V-BAT is a relatively large drone with a 500 km range. In horizontal mode, it can loiter over the target area for 10 hours. In contrast, kamikaze drones currently available with Ukrainian forces cannot fly beyond 100 km and have a loiter time of 10 to 15 minutes.
I posted about the V-Bat in the science forums. The platform is an elegant solution to achieving VTOL capability while retaining the range that wings bring. It's not the only way but it is a simple way. It should be able to scale up. There have been a few tail sitting manned aircraft, the Convair XFY Pogo was probably the most advanced. I also really like the way the prop is in a shroud, much safer to handle, especially in a naval environment - think of launching a UAV from a wet, yawing and pitching deck. I think sailors will appreciate the shroud. However the article wasn't so much about the platform, as it's ability to work in contested environments with significant EW. This capability is going to be mandatory in military drones.
 

Attachments

  • 1730771365441.png
    1730771365441.png
    11.5 KB · Views: 3
I posted about the V-Bat in the science forums. The platform is an elegant solution to achieving VTOL capability while retaining the range that wings bring. It's not the only way but it is a simple way. It should be able to scale up. There have been a few tail sitting manned aircraft, the Convair XFY Pogo was probably the most advanced. I also really like the way the prop is in a shroud, much safer to handle, especially in a naval environment - think of launching a UAV from a wet, yawing and pitching deck. I think sailors will appreciate the shroud. However the article wasn't so much about the platform, as it's ability to work in contested environments with significant EW. This capability is going to be mandatory in military drones.
From the article I posted.
While there can be little doubt that the V-BAT will pose serious challenges to the continued advance of Russian forces in Donbass, the drone is highly unlikely to reverse the course of the war.

So how important to Ukraine’s war effort is the V-Bat going to be?
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

From the article I posted.
While there can be little doubt that the V-BAT will pose serious challenges to the continued advance of Russian forces in Donbass, the drone is highly unlikely to reverse the course of the war.

So how important to Ukraine’s war effort is the V-Bat going to be?
Not much, unless there is a million of them. I suspect they are reasonably expensive in the million dollar range. Note this is a guess. The only figure in the public domain is $198 million USD the USCG paid for them. Numbers unknown and what ever else is included in the price is unknown. To use them in mass you would like to get the price down to less than $100,000. If you build them in great numbers I can't see any technical reason you couldn't get them down to the price of a modest car.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Europe War in Ukraine - Thread 4 - thread rules updated

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top