- Sep 26, 2017
- 29,193
- 49,423
- AFL Club
- Geelong
I’ll be very measured in my responseI think that's a biased way to view it. I don't think the "ffs" is necessary. Most dogs supporters would view Mackie as being difficult in this circumstance for not compromising. This dogs supporter that has ventured onto our board has shown the ability to objectively view their position, I like to do the same. Both Mackie and Power are building a reputation of being difficult.
You’re very very wrong and I wish I could be more blunt than that
Ffs indeed
The club is on record with offering pick 17 for a player that clearly doesn’t want to be , that the club clearly doesn’t want him and want to trade him after him being injuries for a full year and hasn’t been offered a contract
Yet there’s only one person in the negotiations holding out for more despite having no leavage in the situation
And you’re saying it’s Mackie
Again wish I could be more blunt