You've posted in the wrong thread.Let's face it, if this guy was out of contract he'd be a delisted free agent. He's worth nothing and the big contract makes him worth less than nothing.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
You've posted in the wrong thread.Let's face it, if this guy was out of contract he'd be a delisted free agent. He's worth nothing and the big contract makes him worth less than nothing.
I think this is more or less what will go down. No way we do a straight up future first with nothing back.I think there’s a middle ground between gcs wanting that 1st, and us paying a second.
We get a second 1st rounder (prob a future 1st) from the Houston trade and give that to gcs for luko and pick 26 (or a future 2nd)
Gcs get the future 1st they want, lose a pick they won’t use anyway as they will be matching bids and can do that with the pics they already have / can get easily.
We get a second rounder back to draft needed talent.
We cant be trading GC our future 1st for Luko and pay his 1.9mil salary for the next 2 years that he's still owed.
Would be one of the most idiotic things we would have done!
NOT WORTH A FIRST ROUNDER
It's not gonna be a salary dump guys. We also won't be paying an F1.Salary dump trade scenario pls.
I could see it being our future first with something coming back this year like their 20 or 26, with them paying a little bit of salary.It's not gonna be a salary dump guys. We also won't be paying an F1.
My best (semi-educated) guess is that as part of other trades we acquire a F2 from Richmond/North/West Coast and that will be used with GC paying a small-ish (200k) portion of his salary.
If we were to hand over a first/future first I'd expect GC to be paying >50% of his salary which isn't too bad an outcome anyway.
How about we do a Jack Bowes and take all of Luko’s salary + pick 12 for Future 2nd?I could see it being our future first with something coming back this year like their 20 or 26, with them paying a little bit of salary.
he did last week, when he did the press conferenceCD mentioning our F1 being unavailable unless the AFL agrees worries me.
He should just be pointing to the Bowes trade in interviews. Trade Radio will mention this trade hundreds of times before it goes through - keep that in their minds.
Is this a legitimate article or a stitch up?Latest news:
DISCOUNT JACK
By Simeon Thomas-Wilson
Gold Coast’s willingness to pay part of Jack Lukosius’ contract will likely impact trade negotiations with Port Adelaide as the former No.2 pick looks to land at Alberton.
With the season over attention now turns to the free agency and trade period, with both South Australian clubs set to be busy again.
What the Power ends up stumping up for Lukosius could depend on the Suns’ desire to take on some of his money.
The swingman was contracted for two more years at the Suns, on a heavily back-ended contract believed to be around $1 million per year.
The Power will give the 24-year-old a six-year contact after he chose Port Adelaide to play with captain and good friend Connor Rozee.
Gold Coast wants a first-round pick, while the Power is considered likely to prefer to part with a second selection for Lukosius.
But if the Suns take on some of Lukosius’ contract, then the pick they could receive for the Woodville-West Torrens product could improve.
With 3 of Lukosius, Georgiades, Marshall, Finlayson, Lord as tall forwards, the days of bomb it high and try to lock it in are dead. A whole new forward set up and execution is needed.Has he signed yet?
Is this a legitimate article or a stitch up?
It all come down to the money.We cant be trading GC our future 1st for Luko and pay his 1.9mil salary for the next 2 years that he's still owed.
Would be one of the most idiotic things we would have done!
NOT WORTH A FIRST ROUNDER