ahhh Gardiner couldn't cover for Cox as he is always injured. He wont become our full time ruckman again until he has at least 5 or 6 full games to get back some Match Fitness.
oh and understudy, i have no prespective? (how about perspective?) do you think judd, cousins and fletcher would get anywhere near as many possessions without Cox?
They way you talk, it doesn't matter if cousins and Cox have 40 possessions each if you are missing the player that scores the winning point or goal then you couldn't have won without them. I guess there's no point arguing, it's like people talking about eagles and melbourne, until we win a game this year without Judd you will all think he is the key to our team well hopefully we don't have to play another game this year without him. But as i said before in many games this year he hasn't been in our top 5 players on the ground and we performed well anyway, oh yeah that's right if Judd's tagger was on another one of our players we would have lost
oh and understudy, i have no prespective? (how about perspective?) do you think judd, cousins and fletcher would get anywhere near as many possessions without Cox?
They way you talk, it doesn't matter if cousins and Cox have 40 possessions each if you are missing the player that scores the winning point or goal then you couldn't have won without them. I guess there's no point arguing, it's like people talking about eagles and melbourne, until we win a game this year without Judd you will all think he is the key to our team well hopefully we don't have to play another game this year without him. But as i said before in many games this year he hasn't been in our top 5 players on the ground and we performed well anyway, oh yeah that's right if Judd's tagger was on another one of our players we would have lost