Clearly the approach needs to change or it won't matter what draft picks we get the disaster will roll on. Maybe if we can solve the injury crisis the standalone side might function better but that seems like a stretch. I am also worried that it's not sustainable anyway because the clear advantage of a full club setup like Freo Peel is clearly working long term far better than our way.Freo's alignment with Peel works because Freo don't try and run the Peel football club. Peel call the shots but work with Freo to try and appease as best they can with where players play. On game day however it is the Peel coach who decides and thats the end of it.
West Coast have nothing but problems with every single system because they want to run everything, the whole point of an alignment is for the WAFL club to be in control and to provide a strong competitive place for the AFL players to play and develop. East perth alignment failed because West Coast wanted to be in control. It is the Eagles that are the problem every time.
Now they have their own side which no senior WAFL players will ever want to play for and they are still not happy, injuries are the issue at West coast but straight away like clock work the Eagles instead of taking responsibility blamed the WAFL clubs.
The Eagles need to look at their own back yard, extend a hand out to the Perth football club and ask them if they will align. They need to let Perth have total control over the alignment, they need to let the Perth Board pick the coach and all staff and not have any Eagles staff involved. Just an agreement that we have a place for your players to play and develop and we will do our best to play players in positions that you have requested. However during game day it will be Perth's decision if they want to change it up and move players around pending on game circumstances.
Surely this can't be difficult? Yet it is for only one AFL club in Australia which is the WCE.