What is your political persuasion?

What is your political persuasion?

  • Far Left

    Votes: 7 10.4%
  • Left

    Votes: 10 14.9%
  • Center Left

    Votes: 18 26.9%
  • Center / Moderate

    Votes: 4 6.0%
  • Center Right

    Votes: 13 19.4%
  • Right

    Votes: 11 16.4%
  • Far Right

    Votes: 4 6.0%

  • Total voters
    67

Remove this Banner Ad

Mr Crow! said:
Look at how he turned around the nation, which was completely broken due to hyperinflation... caused by the unjust Treaty of Versaille (spelling?).

Economically, the regime was brilliant. Prosperity, national pride, getting the nation moving forward......
......and genocide.
 
Mr Crow! said:
I AGREE!

Look at how he turned around the nation, which was completely broken due to hyperinflation... caused by the unjust Treaty of Versaille (spelling?).

Economically, the regime was brilliant. Prosperity, national pride, getting the nation moving forward.

Unlike the Left, look at Soviet Russia... famine, badly run economic system...


Except for the fact that the nations economy was entirely reliant on the German War Machine, and hinged on Germanies expansion and subjucation of Europe and prone to rapid collapse in light of a Military defeat (see the end of WWII). Not counting the fact that he Killed 12 Million People.


But it's good to see that the supporters of the Australian Right appear to favour a strong economy over individual rights :rolleyes: .
 
Mr Crow! said:
I AGREE!

Look at how he turned around the nation, which was completely broken due to hyperinflation... caused by the unjust Treaty of Versaille (spelling?).

And look at how, within 12 years of gaining power, he put it in an even worse situation!

Economically, the regime was brilliant. Prosperity, national pride, getting the nation moving forward.

Economically, the regime was a fraud. Complete and utter fraud. 'Solved' unemployment by booting Jews and women out of the workforce and ramping up the military. That's not economic growth. Neither is slave labour or printing 'more' money to pay troops.

Unlike the Left, look at Soviet Russia... famine, badly run economic system...

Soviet Russia didn't begin to struggle until the 1960s. Between the '30s and '50s, it was seen in much of the world as a dynamic model for rapid growth. Of course, it has now been discredited - centralisation doesn't work, and if you had any more than a cartoonish comprehension of politics, you'd know that that applies to both facism and Stalinism.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Freo Big Fella said:
Captain Obvious to the rescue!

Yet notice how no-one here (besides one idiot) shows any form of support for Stalinism?
Whom are you calling an "Idiot"?,i would think my academic qualifications would be far superior to yours.
 
Bombers 2003 said:
i have a PH D.
And? We've already seen that PhD don't necessarily mean much if Dr Alf has one. I could go do one if I want, but I don't want to. Doesn't make me any less intelligent.

Problem with people like you is your ideals and political leanings have too much control over your brain and your decision making. We only have to look at your claim that GWB had black people murdered to stop them voting against him. Seriously, what person of balanced common sense would believe that? Only a person who doesn't have the ability to think objectively.

Perhaps you just have a false sense of intelligence?
 
bunsen burner said:
. We only have to look at your claim that GWB had black people murdered to stop them voting against him. Seriously, what person of balanced common sense would believe that?
Read the "Clinton Wars" the evidence is in that.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

bunsen burner said:
Perhaps you just have a false sense of intelligence?
Perhaps i dont worship JWH like you either.If it had any intelligence it would Know how much hatred it causes in some quaters of Australian Society.
 
Bombers 2003 said:
Read the "Clinton Wars" the evidence is in that.
Another reason why you and many others here over rate your intelligence. Anyone can go read a book that backs up their political beliefs. Doesn't mean it's gospel just as it doesn't mean a person who's written a book with the opposite viewpoint has no credibility. Because that's pretty much all I hear here. "Go read such and such a book. You will learn something. Bah! That author of that other book with a contradicting opinion has no credibility".

Some people have an ideal first and then go and read everything that backs up that ideal whilst ignoring anything that contradicts it. Whilst some people don't really have set ideals and are open to ideas from both sides and then will make their opinion accordingly.
 
Bombers 2003 said:
Perhaps i dont worship JWH like you either.
I don't worship him. Think he's been good as far as PMs go and felt strongly that he was by far the better man than Latham. Show me someone better and I'll vote for them.


If it had any intelligence it would Know how much hatred it causes in some quaters of Australian Society.
I'm very aware of that. Do you think Latham would have been any different. Johnny polarises society more than most other PMs but Latham would have been his equal.

ps You really need to see someone about your hatred for the sake of your own mental well being.
 
Bombers 2003 said:
Whom are you calling an "Idiot"?,i would think my academic qualifications would be far superior to yours.


What's your PhD in? Mass Muder? Prison Camp Construction? Paranoia? I'm intelligent enough to realise that the strengethening of a countries eceonomy doesn't justify or excuse te death of tens of millions of innocent people.
 
bunsen burner said:
Another reason why you and many others here over rate your intelligence. Anyone can go read a book that backs up their political beliefs. Doesn't mean it's gospel just as it doesn't mean a person who's written a book with the opposite viewpoint has no credibility. Because that's pretty much all I hear here. "Go read such and such a book. You will learn something. Bah! That author of that other book with a contradicting opinion has no credibility".

Some people have an ideal first and then go and read everything that backs up that ideal whilst ignoring anything that contradicts it. Whilst some people don't really have set ideals and are open to ideas from both sides and then will make their opinion accordingly.
You tell me to provide evidence on this subject,i do,then you say the evidence i provide is biased.I cant find any pro-GWB material that isnt Shyte on Clinton,i mean i tried to read some of the anti-clinton material and fell asleep from sheer boredom with the various authors hatred of Clinton.
 
bunsen burner said:
I'm very aware of that. Do you think Latham would have been any different. Johnny polarises society more than most other PMs but Latham would have been his equal.
I'm glad you acknowledge the fact that Johnny is a divisive PM.As for Latham,i'm not sure that would be true.He does accept that to many people he isnt perfect,i also think that Peter Costello,and i have some respect for HIM against Abbott and Nelson,could possibly be a polarising force as PM.
 
This poll, along with the poll about which political parties you support, definately shows that this message forum easily swings towards the Left.
 
bunsen burner said:
And? We've already seen that PhD don't necessarily mean much if Dr Alf has one. I could go do one if I want, but I don't want to. Doesn't make me any less intelligent.

Problem with people like you is your ideals and political leanings have too much control over your brain and your decision making. We only have to look at your claim that GWB had black people murdered to stop them voting against him. Seriously, what person of balanced common sense would believe that? Only a person who doesn't have the ability to think objectively.

Perhaps you just have a false sense of intelligence?

Another litany of assertions and value judgements.

As BigFooty's self-proclaimed Master of Linear Reasoning, would you care to back up this bollocks ... or should we just take your word for it?
 
Dr AlfAndrews said:
Another litany of assertions and value judgements.

As BigFooty's self-proclaimed Master of Linear Reasoning, would you care to back up this bollocks ... or should we just take your word for it?
Do whatever you want with it.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

What is your political persuasion?

Back
Top