Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 6 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Nah. Essendon to win and Bomber to stand on the dais and remove a mask to reveal he's been James Hird all along, Scooby Doo style. The interweb outrage from the Helen Lovejoy's would be delicious.Probably Fremantle for the fact they haven't netted one yet.
Could almost go with Essendon just to assure for Hird never to come back...............Can't believe I could go for Essendon but that's what it's come to.
I guess blatant systemic and repeated contraventions of the codes framework is more palatable. Good to see you're sticking fat.I would choose someone that doesn't gets AFL assistance in the form of extra AFL dividends (Port Adelaide), backhand deals, special deals via Tasmania and Waverley Park (ie Hawthorn)...so I guess that leaves just Geelong.
They rorted the father-son..but that is about it. I guess they are the cleanest of all the teams left with a chance to win.
I guess blatant systemic and repeated contraventions of the codes framework is more palatable. Good to see you're sticking fat.
Loose with the facts or comprehension problems? Lol, the link you provided undermines your assertions. I suggest you read the article yourself. The article you linked claims Hawthorns deal with Tasmania materialized despite the wishes of the AFL. The AFL plumped for an agreement to be reached between North and the Tasmanian government vis-a-vis relocation. That's right- despite. Preposition: In defiance of. No leg up there for the Hawks from the AFL.A cheat is a cheat, but I guess you don't think Hawthorn cheated in 1992 and 1998, yeah? You have a sliding scale for "cheats" I am guessing where if you are only caught cheating a lot does it count, Hawthorn's cheating isn't worth worrying about? Let's just call that "cheating" "borrowing" or something nicer?
They only stole 5 lollies from the lolly shop so we will overlook that cheating and just punish the "big fish"?
Fact is that Hawthorn also won recent premierships on the massssive leg-up that the AFL gave them via the Tasmanian deal and the Waverley Park deal. Would they have these flags without this leg up? You be the judge.
http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-ne...f-the-equalisation-debate-20131213-2zcsl.html
Geelong has been given the least amount of "bonuses" from the AFL, so it makes their rise more remarkable than the others in line for this year's premiership. Some might argue that Hawthorn deserves it the least of the four in contention.
Loose with the facts or comprehension problems? Lol, the link you provided undermines your assertions. I suggest you read the article yourself. The article you linked claims Hawthorns deal with Tasmania materialized despite the wishes of the AFL. The AFL plumped for an agreement to be reached between North and the Tasmanian government vis-a-vis relocation. That's right- despite. Preposition: In defiance of. No leg up there for the Hawks from the AFL.
As for your ambiguous reference to 1992 and 1998, perhaps we are to believe you are aware of events that the AFL aren't/weren't privy to or that the inferences you have asserted are an invention of your mind. I'm tipping the latter.
And it's at this point I depart and leave you to perform a most convincing impersonation of a buffoon.