- Dec 11, 2009
- 31,841
- 40,915
- AFL Club
- Geelong
You keep going on with the mumbo jumbo.
Sydney needed the COLA to get players there as the life style is much more expensive, sydney just used a loop hole and the afl did a typical knee jerk reaction, which will end up hurting the swans. Sydney are now not in the top 3 best run clubs. Collingwood is easily top 3.
I don't know what your thing about hawthorn needing picks 10 years ago will affect them in the future, yes it helped us in the past or present at that time because it was meant to, know knew that one of the players would become one of the best bigman in the league, even when he wasn't meant to go that high (roughead).
Also having a 'well run' club like hawthorn will get the players in no matter what the situation of the playing group is or ladder position.......sarcasm. Every team has low points, some just in different ways
Reality is players will most likely choose success and then move if they want that lifestyle after footy especially if that team is struggling (geelong). Who says that carlton and essendon will get back up? They have a young list of talent, thought you didn't pay much attention young talented teams because is usually doesn't work out.....
Also if Geelong is such a good club with finance and stuff why all the pay outs from the government?
Think GC26 is trying to say that the success of the HFC in recent decades has been partially achieved through the privilege of zoning and priority picks.
Whether he / she is right or wrong is a debate for another time, but I think that's the gist of their statement.