Call it whatever you like. It's just my opinion and I'm happy to stand by itYour sanctimony is downright painful. Have a dislike.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Call it whatever you like. It's just my opinion and I'm happy to stand by itYour sanctimony is downright painful. Have a dislike.
OMG ya kidding. What a ******* dick
If people in here are seriously thinking Roy will get suspended for a game for that they are absolutely kidding themselves. Might get a tiny fine if he’s unlucky and that’s about it.
No chance.Are people really thinking that Roy will be suspended?
NoAre people really thinking that Roy will be suspended?
I’m expecting the umpire to apologise and Roy to become Sir Roy.If people in here are seriously thinking Roy will get suspended for a game for that they are absolutely kidding themselves. Might get a tiny fine if he’s unlucky and that’s about it.
So you walked when feathering one to the keeper?Nope. The difference between cheating and not cheating is value and integrity. IMHO. That's it... and only that.
But, that's just my perception and opinion. If you see it differently then fine.
Ok. Have a like then.Call it whatever you like. It's just my opinion and I'm happy to stand by it
Is he a favourite for the Brownlow?If people in here are seriously thinking Roy will get suspended for a game for that they are absolutely kidding themselves. Might get a tiny fine if he’s unlucky and that’s about it.
England rain. No wayHere comes the rain to put us out of our misery.
it's funny on the ENGvAUS hashtag on twitter that chumps are just saying that Australia are cheating THROUGH an impartial umpire with the Roy decision haha yep, good one, dickheads.
and it'll probably work just as farcically haha they'd have to review every single possible wicket ball before the next ball is bowled or the batsman crosses the rope.Maybe all “out” wicket decisions should be reviewed just like goals in the AFL?
Yeah because England have never appealed a decision that wasn't out. Shut the **** upWell if Australians can boo a player and call them a cheat for not walking, we’ll call Carey a cheat for appealingly when the batsman misses it by a foot
His team mates will have to be happy with MBEs.I’m expecting the umpire to apologise and Roy to become Sir Roy.
Yes, there was blood and everything
The use of TV, 3rd umpire, review system was brought in to get rid of the howler.
If its good enough for the 3rd umpire to review every dismissal for a no ball, its then good enough for him to review a howler. The decision was shown as not out before Roy had left the field.
Sure you have the bulls**t of players wasting reviews on frivolous LBW's, but that shouldn't mean the 3rd umpire doesn't have the right to make a review call.
No but using mints to get the ball to swing is ball tampering. You are not allowed to use any foreign substance on the ball other than sweat or saliva.
In Australia ball tampering gets you a year's suspension. In England it gets you an OBE