Any of FOS, Smith, Draper or Lalor and even Langford has entered the mix so why give away our F1. That guy is nuts.Actually thought Draft Bored reasoning was pretty sound......you prefer Draper?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Any of FOS, Smith, Draper or Lalor and even Langford has entered the mix so why give away our F1. That guy is nuts.Actually thought Draft Bored reasoning was pretty sound......you prefer Draper?
Ok fair enough.Any of FOS, Smith, Draper or Lalor and even Langford has entered the mix so why give away our F1. That guy is nuts.
Giving up a future 1st to pick a player around the same mark imo is trading madness.Actually thought Draft Bored reasoning was pretty sound......you prefer Draper?
Something will happen around that top 5 for sure. Maybe F1 is more involved more now with Jaidyn Stephenson retiring.Giving up a future 1st to pick a player around the same mark imo is trading madness.
We are far, far, far better off to sit tight & take Draper or whoever we think is the 4th best player (excluding Ashcroft), rather than sacrificing a future 1st to climb 2 spots.
It's no wonder North wouldn't blink accepting this offer.
Wouldn't be surprised if Richmond trade for your pick 2, but there is absolutely no reason for the Crows to when there is not much between the top 4 players.Something will happen around that top 5 for sure. Maybe F1 is more involved more now with Jaidyn Stephenson retiring
No offence, and just my opinion, but Carlton wishful thinking that North would take Tauru at 2 mate. I don’t even think he’s our preferred KP player. You’ll be taking Draper at 3 if it’s North at 2 I reckon. Think FOS is going at 2 regardless. Could be wrong. But us using 2 to take Tauru feels like the ultimate gamble on our club’s future. But we will see1. Rich - Lalor
2. NM - Tauru
3. Carl - O'Sullivan
4. Bris - Ashcroft
5. Adel - Draper
Wouldn't be surprised if Richmond trade for your pick 2, but there is absolutely no reason for the Crows to when there is not much between the top 4 players.
Giving up our future 1st to go up 2 places for a player valued around the same is complete madness.
This kind of thinking blows my mind. There's a top 5 because Cal Twomey says there is. Oh look another player has entered the mix because Cal Twomey says they have.Any of FOS, Smith, Draper or Lalor and even Langford has entered the mix so why give away our F1. That guy is nuts.
There is no consensus about the order of the 1st 5 picks as they are quite even... so it's insane to offer our future 1st rounder for a future 2nd rounder to slide up 2 places to take a simila ralue [if not the same!l pkayer.Not giving up a future first! Sliding our first down to Kanga's second!
This kind of thinking blows my mind. There's a top 5 because Cal Twomey says there is. Oh look another player has entered the mix because Cal Twomey says they have.
Each club has their preferred players sorted in a ranked list, or at the very least tiers. So unless you know Hamish and know he has ranked the top 5 players evenly then it's just crazy saying we're happy with the guy we get at 4 because they're all so even. No. That is nuts.
We would have a clear ranking with this top 4. So what you're saying is you're happy settling for the guy we have potentially 4th on our list. I'm saying, I'd rather slide our first back to norths second next year and get the guy we want 1st or 2nd most in this draft.
In dealing with Brisbane for their pick 20, I have a feeling we gave them a guarantee that we wouldn't bid on Ashcroft with pick one. Just a hunch.Why wouldn't tiges bid on Ashcroft, does it matter? for them. Just makes Brissie coff up a little more, points wise, yeah? And so they should.
I'd give up a future 2nd rounder to move from 4 to 2 with North but no more for the reasons you say but if they would do it, moving to 2 means we are sure of the player we want and if they don't care which of the top 4 they get (and they get tilo stay inside the defined top 4), they gain an f2 for nothing.Wouldn't be surprised if Richmond trade for your pick 2, but there is absolutely no reason for the Crows to when there is not much between the top 4 players.
Giving up our future 1st to go up 2 places for a player valued around the same is complete madness.
We don't have any future 2nd!I'd give up a future 2nd rounder to move from 4 to 2 with North but no more for the reasons you say but if they would do it, moving to 2 means we are sure of the player we want and if they don't care which of the top 4 they get (and they get tilo stay inside the defined top 4), they gain an f2 for nothing.
I know but we have 3 x f3' to look to trade for one with a side needing points next year for academy or father sonsWe don't have any future 2nd!
We are well placed at pick 4 to get a gun midfielder & trading up is just throwing away trade capital unnecessarily.
So you want to leave us with hardly any picks next year to get a similar if not the same player.I know but we have 3 x f3' to look to trade for one with a side needing points next year for academy or father sons
Not fussed about some 3rd rounders next year..worry about that then. Get the player we really want now and still have our f1 i am fine withSo you want to leave us with hardly any picks next year to get a similar if not the same player.
Madness given how even the top 4 or 5 are imo.
I don't think North will get fair value for trading out 2, so wont happen. My thoughts (excluding bids) and will be a rebel and go top 10 instead of 5.
Tiges - Lalor
Roos - FOS
Blues - Draper
Crows - Smith
Dees - Langford
Tigers - Smillie
Saints - Tauru
Saints - Reid
Dees - Armstrong or Trainor
Tiges - Armstrong or Trainor
1.Richmond - Lalor
2.Brisbane - Ashcroft
3.St.Kilda - Smith
4.Carlton - O’Sullivan
5.Adelaide - Draper
6.Melbourne - Langford
7.Richmond - Smillie
8.North - Tauru
9.St.Kilda - Reid
10.Melbourne - Armstrong
*North now hold St.Kilda’s 2025 1st pick