Usage for hash tag: 6,

#27, Cerra for #6, 2022 1st and McGovern?

Carlton should give up #6 and their future 1st in exchange for Cerra and our future 2nd. It's essentially Cerra and #22 for #6, #15 if the world ends.

Freo will be looking for more than pick #6, guaranteed. We should not give it to them.

If you consider what we would expect to get for Cerra and Lobb in separate exchanges, let's be conservative and say its: #6, #25, #18 I think that gets Jackson if he tells them he is gone end of next season anyway.

Would you have worn your beanie to cover the COVID hair? Lockdown #6, DIY haircut #2 administered today. Used mrs J's help to clip the back. It looks decidedly better than before. The clipper fade looks neat and even found enough confidence to cut a hard-part.

That's worse than their pick #6 and #25 currently. What about Pick #6, #25 and Jordan Clark to Freo, SPS to West Coast, pick #29 to Geelong, Cerra to Carlton? I'd also be happy with: Pick #6, 2022 1st (Carlton) to Freo Cerra & 2022 2nd (Fremantle) to Carlton Pick #49 to Carlton SPS to West...

WC < SPS, #25 > #10 Carlton < #10 > SPS, #25 Carlton < Cerra, F3 > #6, #10 Freo < #6, #10 > Cerra, F3 Brisbane < #10, #27, > #14, #18 Freo < #14, #18, > #10, #27 Geelong < F2, > Clark Freo < Clark, > F2 Freo goes to the draft with #6, #8, #14, #18 Works for me :) Yes, I'm not serious. And...

...forwards. I figure if we have pick #3 then we can trade that for #7, #15 from Richmond. Then we have #22 and #27 which the Dogs will bite our hand off for in exchange for #18. We draft #6, #7, #8, #15, #18 Take three talls with those picks. Best gets a spot in the 22, rotate them heavily.

...and the fact we can't see who's really improved? I feel we are still looking for the A-Grader in the middle although I have hopes for Peddles. But with the top few going before our pick assuming #6, is it even worth picking it at all? #6 may as well be #12 On RMX1941 using BigFooty.com...

...good news to their members. Great time for Cerra to up his contract from $700,000 x4 to backended $850,000 x 6. Then getting it done with pick #6, #25 and their 2022 1st for Cerra and our 2022 2nd. Then we trade their #25 and our #27 for the Bulldog's #15. Meaning we turn Cerra, #27 and a...

...on the overall ledger. We drafted Neale at #58, got 7 good years out of him (far more than an average pick #58), then traded him and got pick #6, #19 etc for him, then wasted much of that on Hogan, and used the remainder of the currency on getting Lobb, Valente and Schultz. As a pure draft...

I may be in the minority, but I would be very content if Carlton gave up #6, #24 for Cerra and acquired Hewett as a F/A. I'm not sure as to Riccardi's value but I dare say it wouldn't be more than a 2022 3rd round pick?

...or fourth round coming back was where I see Cerra's value. (The respective starting points will be Freo wanting two firsts without splitting #6, and Carlton just pick #6 by itself.) Neale went with pick #30 for picks #6, #19 & #55, so call it roughly a top 10 and the equivalent of a late...

Keep #6, #8, #25 and #27 Trade future first for Neale. Gives them points for their academy player next year.

Something like Pick #8 and #27 for Neale #15 and #18 If we are picking up #6 and #25 from Carlton for Cerra then it rates Cerra higher and means we replace the mid and draft: #6, #15, #18, #25 Can swap the last two for pick #14 if you need to.

The question isn’t JHF vs Callaghan. It’s whether JHF gets #6, #18 or #27?

...We have a history of trading Lachie's for top #5 picks. So seems likely Schultz for Hawthorn's pick #5. Cerra for Carlton's pick #6 (+ other picks) We head into the draft with picks #3, #5, #6, #8... Give me time and I will add to this in an attempt to trigger every other club's supporter...

...and we rate him lower than the players we would take with #8 - then we swap our pick #8 with their #10 and their second round pick. Turning #6, #8, #27 into #6, #10, #27 and #29 If we haven't been able to get Carlton's future first and instead have their #25 then after the AFL relax the...

...average of 1462 per pick (pick #9 is 1469) Carlton since 2000: 21 years with an average pick per year of pick #3 to pick #4 - average pick of #6, since there were multiples per year Fremantle since 2000: 21 years with an average pick per year of pick #8 - average pick of #9 since there were...

Let's take a look at this, no names, just first round draft picks. Including the 2000 draft... #1, #1, #1, #1, #1 #2 #3 #4, #4 #6, #6 #9 #10, #10 #11, #11 #12, #12 #13 #15 #17 #18 #19, #19 #20 #22 That's a total of 44,761 points across twenty one years and twenty six picks, an average of 1721...

I think so. If are able to secure pick #6 and their 2022 1st round pick for Cerra then we could be able to trade #6, Carlton's 2022 1st and our own for McDonald retaining our own pick #8. But that would be expensive. We may be able to get their current pick #13 back, but Sydney wouldn't be...

...valuable, but we aren't talking about the same sort of first round picks in exchange. I want their first this year and next. I'll budge on sending back our future second. I'd like the exchange to be: Cerra, Acres, 2022 2nd round pick for #6, 2022 1st round pick + a player under 22 under...

Trade Cerra and our 2022 2nd for #6, #25 and their 2022 1st round pick. Step 1: Inform WCE that we intend to pick Erasmus at pick #8. Step 2: WCE offer pick #10 and #29 for our pick #8. Step 3: Accept. Then it becomes #6, #10, #25, #27 and #29 Trade #25, #27 and #29 for pick #14 and 2022 2nd...

The poster hasn't summarised the trades particularly well - it is actually: Pick #6, #24* & Dow for Cerra & Freo's future second round pick. (* it's actually pick #25) The pick #18 is a transitory hold, not your own starting pick.

Yeah, pick #6, 2022 1st round pick and then we can discuss extras from Freo going back for the contracted players Carlton need to offload to fit Cerra. SPS will be cut because Carlton can't fit his contract in their cap post Cerra. He will be a PSD pickup.

The AFL rules don't allow players to be worth negative value in trade. But it could be something like: Cerra for #6, 2021 1st, #25 and Fisher Where Fisher is the salary dump that lets them fit Cerra.

#6, #25 and their 2021 1st round pick.

If we are carrying #6, #8, #25 and #27 then we should look to trade #25 & #27 for the Bulldog's #14. Then use #6, #8 and #14. Best Mid, Best Tall, Best Tall.

...over the line, however I don't think I'd classify Cerra as "elite". He's a good young, high draft pick with years of development into him - but he's a long way off "elite" status which is what would command some of these crazy suggestions of two first round picks, or #6, #25 + <insert player>.

#6, #7, #8 !