I understand your reasoning.
Being competitive ensures a healthy winning culture.
Losing too many games doesn't assist with player retention and recruitment.
Young players playing finals is the best form of development.
-
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
List Mgmt. 2021 List Management: Draft, Trade, Free Agency and Academy
- Thread starter Lach72
- Start date
- Tagged users None
- Status
Being competitive ensures a healthy winning culture.
Losing too many games doesn't assist with player retention and recruitment.
Young players playing finals is the best form of development.
Do you really think we could get a pick 19 or below for Lobb? I like Lobb and don’t think he will go but he’s not worth that much or are you just thinking we can ream GC again and get overs for Lobb.
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
- May 26, 2003
- 24,534
- 18,987
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
- Other Teams
- SFFC, Aussie Women's Cricket, HNK
Three way trade:
6,32,34, Clark(e) > Freo
25,27 > Geelong
Cerra > Carlton
Freo give 27, Cerra; get 6,32,34, Clark
Carlton give 6,25; get Cerra
Geelong give 32,34, Clarke; get 25,27
Values Cerra pick 3, Clark pick 46.
Maybe unders for Geelong? We might have to throw in a future 4th to even it up a bit. Brings Clarke down ~38/39. Cerra still pick 3.
6,32,34, Clark(e) > Freo
25,27 > Geelong
Cerra > Carlton
Freo give 27, Cerra; get 6,32,34, Clark
Carlton give 6,25; get Cerra
Geelong give 32,34, Clarke; get 25,27
Values Cerra pick 3, Clark pick 46.
Maybe unders for Geelong? We might have to throw in a future 4th to even it up a bit. Brings Clarke down ~38/39. Cerra still pick 3.
Last edited:
DRAGONS FFC - Moderator
- #12,957
In that scenario, we would have 3, 6 and 8 - just no F1
- May 26, 2003
- 24,534
- 18,987
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
- Other Teams
- SFFC, Aussie Women's Cricket, HNK
Haven’t we had short term pain for 20/27 years?
Taylor
Community Leader
- Moderator
- #12,959
Yeah we are in big trouble for tall forwards.Don’t mind it Taylor,
But who plays forward if Tabs gets a serious injury and misses a bunch..
Treacy as our only key forward probably costs us a lot of games and then we won’t have our first rounder to show for it
I figure if we have pick #3 then we can trade that for #7, #15 from Richmond.
Then we have #22 and #27 which the Dogs will bite our hand off for in exchange for #18.
We draft #6, #7, #8, #15, #18
Take three talls with those picks. Best gets a spot in the 22, rotate them heavily.
- Nov 9, 2001
- 2,256
- 8,677
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
- Other Teams
- are listed below us on the ladder
Yes, you pussy. Suck it up and buckle in for, ooh, at least a couple more.
This is why I dont understand why people are happy to trade lobb.Don’t mind it Taylor,
But who plays forward if Tabs gets a serious injury and misses a bunch..
Treacy as our only key forward probably costs us a lot of games and then we won’t have our first rounder to show for it
freo can’t win games without key forwards
Think we're closer to a flag if our young forwards can develop alongside Lobb. They will develop far quicker with some experienced players around them.
Just silly to trade him out.
this is facts, hes def important to our structure and has had good years for us, recently hes been either injured or not stepped up enough. if we can get good value out of moving him on then id take it, might even force us to stop relying on two players (lobb, darcy) to move the ball forward
took 3rd most contested marks of any player in 2020…. Players like that dont grow on trees don’t unfortunately
Don't show Joao this, he doesn't want to see Mitch relegated to the bottom
Genuine question here, I see lots of hypothetical trades where people are suggesting we give up next year's first round. Is there some reason we value next year's picks less than this year? Is it because we assume we will be higher on the ladder therefore a later pick?
Just don't quite get why we are super protective of current picks but spend futures as if they are just steak knives.
Just don't quite get why we are super protective of current picks but spend futures as if they are just steak knives.
Snuffaluphagus
Brownlow Medallist
- Sep 10, 2015
- 25,241
- 87,293
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
The real answer is because people want every WA kid imaginable in case they see the next Naughton player for another club.
I'd bet my house we dont trade our future 1st AND we wont break apart either top 10. If we really trade well, we'll have two top 10 and two top 30 picks. There is no need for more picks than that. I'd argue its actually detrimental to take more picks than that
100%
Teams generally overrate their list, next years chances and ability to spot talent.
Future second and third round picks have far less risk than first round picks where it take out pear shaped.
Collingwood trading out their 2021 first round pick last year turned out very badly.
Not really, it would have been eaten up by Daicos at 1
wakojako
Norm Smith Medallist
- Nov 15, 2020
- 7,181
- 12,427
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
Tbf Tay's trade idea gives us pick 3 which we could use on Callaghan who is a gun. At the loss of Lobb though? Not sure.
Snuffaluphagus
Brownlow Medallist
- Sep 10, 2015
- 25,241
- 87,293
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
Ok, no realistic trade do we give up a future 1st. The Weller deal is the extreme anomaly, they are going to involve pick 3 for Lobb unless 6 or 8 is going back
Why would Lobb go to GC, when his g/friend wants a job in Melbourne?
And the people suggesting that Cox should go forward, go find another sport to follow, as you clearly don't know much about Aussie Rules
And the people suggesting that Cox should go forward, go find another sport to follow, as you clearly don't know much about Aussie Rules
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
- Poll
- Locked
- Locked
