The ball was there a bit different i thinkIs this the first time Stewart been to the tribunal ?.
David King the flog calling for a 6 week suspension.
Tigers supporters seem to have a short memory, Cotchin's bump on Dylan Shiel.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The ball was there a bit different i thinkIs this the first time Stewart been to the tribunal ?.
David King the flog calling for a 6 week suspension.
Tigers supporters seem to have a short memory, Cotchin's bump on Dylan Shiel.
Just heard on the 11 o click news the AFL are looking at not counting the goal that was kicked while Prestia lay injured as the game should not of continued while he was knocked could loose four points
Can't tackle a bloke who hasn't got the ball knock his head off was his only option
Loose 4 points?Just heard on the 11 o click news the AFL are looking at not counting the goal that was kicked while Prestia lay injured as the game should not of continued while he was knocked could loose four points
Can't tackle a bloke who hasn't got the ball knock his head off was his only option
Just heard on the 11 o click news the AFL are looking at not counting the goal that was kicked while Prestia lay injured as the game should not of continued while he was knocked could loose four points
Can't tackle a bloke who hasn't got the ball knock his head off was his only option
For the millionth time on big footyIs this the first time Stewart been to the tribunal ?.
David King the flog calling for a 6 week suspension.
Tigers supporters seem to have a short memory, Cotchin's bump on Dylan Shiel.
I just watched the news. They've also decided to review Close's goal that was given a point and they're adding 5 points to Geelong's score.Just heard on the 11 o click news the AFL are looking at not counting the goal that was kicked while Prestia lay injured as the game should not of continued while he was knocked could loose four points
Can't tackle a bloke who hasn't got the ball knock his head off was his only option
Due to Astburry
I just heard on the 11.30 news, The AFL are looking at not counting the goal Collingwood kicked in the 2011 grand final when James Podsiadly injured his shoulder.Just heard on the 11 o click news the AFL are looking at not counting the goal that was kicked while Prestia lay injured as the game should not of continued while he was knocked could loose four points
Go outside and breathe in some fresh air ... Unless of course you live in Richmond then ignore that and go for a drive instead.Due to Astburry
And also, did not realise Shiel or Cotchin played yesterday???
Thanks for your advice.Go outside and breathe in some fresh air ... Unless of course you live in Richmond then ignore that and go for a drive instead.
It's a game. If you're still melting this long afterwards it's time to do something different with your life.Thanks for your advice.
It’s just I’m really upset at losing one of our best players, arguably our best midfielder for a minimum of 1 & 3/4 games at a real important time of the season.
Dangerously close to 9th…all is wellThanks for your advice.
It’s just I’m really upset at losing one of our best players, arguably our best midfielder for a minimum of 1 & 3/4 games at a real important time of the season.
Thanks for your advice.
It’s just I’m really upset at losing one of our best players, arguably our best midfielder for a minimum of 1 & 3/4 games at a real important time of the season.
Hold on for a moment why are we all being such nice guys saying he should get 4 weeks?? I have seen players raise their elbows and shoulders before making head contact that do not even get 4 weeks, why should his which was a perfectly executed bump that contacted high be deemed 4 weeks?? 2-3 based off the fact there is no raising of the elbow/shoulder which I usually a give away that the player is intending to hit as opposed to bump
Not going to question Stewart's character, that's not needed? but to say it wasn't intentional is garbage he lined him up, the problem is he excuted it poorly, as for length of time for supension no point speculating as the tribunal decidions are like chook lotto.
The question is - what does the 'intention' refer to - the intention to bump or the intention to hurt? If a player intends to bump, which is a legal act, but executes it poorly - then that is careless. But if a player intends to injure (eg the hit that broke Brayshaw's jaw) then that is clearly intentional and not careless. I don't think anyone believes that Stewart intended to injure Prestia. It was a football act, a split-second decision and careless. But he will probably get 3-4 weeks because of all the media uproar and everyone blindly being influenced by it.Not going to question Stewart's character, that's not needed? but to say it wasn't intentional is garbage he lined him up, the problem is he excuted it poorly, as for length of time for supension no point speculating as the tribunal decidions are like chook lotto.
His elbow is not even close to being tucked in... take off your blue and white coloured glasses.
View attachment 1433003
In this context the intent is about the act: he intended to bump.The question is - what does the 'intention' refer to - the intention to bump or the intention to hurt? If a player intends to bump, which is a legal act, but executes it poorly - then that is careless. But if a player intends to injure (eg the hit that broke Brayshaw's jaw) then that is clearly intentional and not careless. I don't think anyone believes that Stewart intended to injure Prestia. It was a football act, a split-second decision and careless. But he will probably get 3-4 weeks because of all the media uproar and everyone blindly being influenced by it.
He never once raised the elbow.View attachment 1433230
It was almost a perfect bump but it's follow through action where he raises the elbow (ever so slightly) which doesn't look good.
It was perfect technique just caught him high. Not a difficult thing to occur given the game moves in the blink of an eye. A little bit lower and was perfect. No raised elbow or shoulder which we have seen get given 2-3 weeks when it is intentional to hit in the head, Stewart’s bump was not intended to hit his head.The fact that Prestia was assisted from the ground & subbed out with concussion would indicate that it wasn't a perfectly executed bump - hence why he's likely looking at a 3 or 4 week suspension
A perfectly executed bump doesn't connect with an opponents head, taking them out of the game - if you want an example of a perfectly executed bump, have a look at Stewart's bump in our clash with Adelaide