No Oppo Supporters 2023 General AFL Discussion - incl. AFL Grand Final

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Levi Casboult gets caught holding the ball.

Kelli: “free kick against the Swans”.
In fairness to her, given how bad we get reamed by umps, there's a distinct chance of that actually happening.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

From the HS AFL Rich List highlighting the Top 10 best and worst contracts;

TOM STEWART $625,000-$725,000

How do the Cats do it? The way they keep players happy — and keep bringing more in — while keeping the salary cap smoothed out is the most savvy in the competition. How is it that a player as important as Tom Stewart is paid between $625,000-$725,000 when he would earn so much more anywhere else. Add to that the skipper Patrick Dangerfield who only just squeezed into top 100, while Tom Hawkins and Mark Blicavs are just outside the Rich 100.

'How do they do it?'
Question I've asked myself on many an occasion. :think:
 
From the HS AFL Rich List highlighting the Top 10 best and worst contracts;

TOM STEWART $625,000-$725,000

How do the Cats do it? The way they keep players happy — and keep bringing more in — while keeping the salary cap smoothed out is the most savvy in the competition. How is it that a player as important as Tom Stewart is paid between $625,000-$725,000 when he would earn so much more anywhere else. Add to that the skipper Patrick Dangerfield who only just squeezed into top 100, while Tom Hawkins and Mark Blicavs are just outside the Rich 100.

'How do they do it?'
Question I've asked myself on many an occasion. :think:


Fresh country air mate
 
How did you keep it under 200 points Simmo?
"You see, Sydney's forwards have a preset goal limit. Knowing their weakness, I allowed wave after wave of inside 50's until they reached their limit and shut down. Kif, show them the premiership I won."
 
From the HS AFL Rich List highlighting the Top 10 best and worst contracts;

TOM STEWART $625,000-$725,000

How do the Cats do it? The way they keep players happy — and keep bringing more in — while keeping the salary cap smoothed out is the most savvy in the competition. How is it that a player as important as Tom Stewart is paid between $625,000-$725,000 when he would earn so much more anywhere else. Add to that the skipper Patrick Dangerfield who only just squeezed into top 100, while Tom Hawkins and Mark Blicavs are just outside the Rich 100.

'How do they do it?'
Question I've asked myself on many an occasion. :think:
Not sure how much truth there is to it (I think players have confirmed it though) but Geelong basically have payment tiers where they pay all their top 5 players the same amount, then the top 6 to 10 get the same amount and so on. They basically tell the players that they know some of them could get paid more elsewhere but if they want to be at a successful club and compete for flags they have to be willing to accept a bit less.

When you couple this with the country or coastal lifestyle that can attract players willing to fit into this pay structure then it makes sense how they can have so much quality and depth on their list.
 
Last edited:
What's with all the Oliver rumours regarding his hamstring injury not being legit? Anything to it or just bs?
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Rumour doing the traps is that, he is serving a sanction for drugs, whether club or afl imposed, eg - 2nd strike. Doesn’t appear to be any hard evidence and club have been very strong in dismissing the rumours.
I knew the rumour , was just wondering where you were coming from
 
Not sure how much truth their is too it (I think players have confirmed it though) but Geelong basically have payment tiers where they pay all their top 5 players the same amount, then the top 6 to 10 get the same amount and so on. They basically tell the players that they know some of them could get paid more elsewhere but if they want to be at a successful club and compete for flags they have to be willing to accept a bit less.

When you couple this with the country or coastal lifestyle that can attract players willing to fit into this pay structure then it makes sense how they can have so much quality and depth on their list.
My next door neighbour is a chippy. Colleague he works with was the one who completed large scale renovations of a significant number of Geelong players homes. He was paid for each job by the owner of Cotton On. He has seen the paperwork. They keep players because of underhanded shit like that and the employment of wives and girlfriends as social media employees. It's ****ing bullshit and if we were to do the same on the scale they are, the rules would be changed in an instant.
 
My next door neighbour is a chippy. Colleague he works with was the one who completed large scale renovations of a significant number of Geelong players homes. He was paid for each job by the owner of Cotton On. He has seen the paperwork. They keep players because of underhanded s*t like that and the employment of wives and girlfriends as social media employees. It's ****** bullshit and if we were to do the same on the scale they are, the rules would be changed in an instant.
Surely other clubs should be sending the AFL a please explain over their turning a blind eye? Or at the very least sending an anonymous package to the AFL with proof and a threat of going to the media.

And given how badly they screwed the swans over buddy surely we'd be first in line?
 
Surely other clubs should be sending the AFL a please explain over their turning a blind eye? Or at the very least sending an anonymous package to the AFL with proof and a threat of going to the media.

And given how badly they screwed the swans over buddy surely we'd be first in line?
Thing is all clubs would do it to a degree so they are not going to bite the hand that feeds it. I'm sure part of Papley remaining at the swans would have been Collis coming up to live here and the organising of work etc for him. There would have been some cost to the swans i'm sure.
 
Thing is all clubs would do it to a degree so they are not going to bite the hand that feeds it. I'm sure part of Papley remaining at the swans would have been Collis coming up to live here and the organising of work etc for him. There would have been some cost to the swans i'm sure.
Clubs would know which others are pushing it to extremes - Geelong being the obvious one. I'd still be pushing it if I were the swans. If we're 5% over the cap based on those deals, but Geelong is 20% above. Then you have to say, **** it, let's either make it even or do away with it.

But I guess you're right. It's more complex than that which means clubs really can't fight it in that way.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top