Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Geelong v Brisbane Lions - 7:30PM Sat
Squiggle tips Cats at 54% chance -- What's your tip? -- Teams on Thurs »
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Prelim Finals
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
AFLW 2024 - Round 3 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Is assume that's former CEO John James?Talking about Carl v Port.
View attachment 2058018
I believe it is, his account is followed by John Cahill, Warren Tredrea and Kane Cornes.Is assume that's former CEO John James?
As good as it may sound, Hinkley to Wet Toast, he has to be be sacked from Port first, believe when I see it.
That's very detailed Chewy316 . Nice.Doesn't have to be sacked necessarily.
If West Coast wants Hinkley (and the noise from this story isn't just coming from Blucher), the most likely scenario will be that Hinkley is informed by West Coast he will get the job provided he goes through a sit down sham interview (a formality). Blucher on behalf of Hinkley then informs Port Adelaide that West Coast wants his client's services and he wishes to be released from the remainder of his contract at Port Adelaide subject to passing the interview.
Said interview happens, Hinkley passes it, contracts are sorted etc.
Then a media release from Port comes out saying Port and Hinkley are having a mutual parting of ways, "we thank Ken for his time at our Club etc ..." And then within a few hours (1 day at the most) West Coast will formally announced that Hinkley is their new coach.
This is a scenario that allows all parties to get to their desired end points without having to officially sack anyone. And at this point it is a very realistic outcome.
Doesn't have to be sacked necessarily.
If West Coast wants Hinkley (and the noise from this story isn't just coming from Blucher), the most likely scenario will be that Hinkley is informed by West Coast he will get the job provided he goes through a sit down sham interview (a formality). Blucher on behalf of Hinkley then informs Port Adelaide that West Coast wants his client's services and he wishes to be released from the remainder of his contract at Port Adelaide subject to passing the interview.
Said interview happens, Hinkley passes it, contracts are sorted etc.
Then a media release from Port comes out saying Port and Hinkley are having a mutual parting of ways, "we thank Ken for his time at our Club etc ..." And then within a few hours (1 day at the most) West Coast will formally announced that Hinkley is their new coach.
This is a scenario that allows all parties to get to their desired end points without having to officially sack anyone. And at this point it is a very realistic outcome.
Doesn't have to be sacked necessarily.
If West Coast wants Hinkley (and the noise from this story isn't just coming from Blucher), the most likely scenario will be that Hinkley is informed by West Coast he will get the job provided he goes through a sit down sham interview (a formality). Blucher on behalf of Hinkley then informs Port Adelaide that West Coast wants his client's services and he wishes to be released from the remainder of his contract at Port Adelaide subject to passing the interview.
Said interview happens, Hinkley passes it, contracts are sorted etc.
Then a media release from Port comes out saying Port and Hinkley are having a mutual parting of ways, "we thank Ken for his time at our Club etc ..." And then within a few hours (1 day at the most) West Coast will formally announced that Hinkley is their new coach.
This is a scenario that allows all parties to get to their desired end points without having to officially sack anyone. And at this point it is a very realistic outcome.
Doesn't have to be sacked necessarily.
If West Coast wants Hinkley (and the noise from this story isn't just coming from Blucher), the most likely scenario will be that Hinkley is informed by West Coast he will get the job provided he goes through a sit down sham interview (a formality). Blucher on behalf of Hinkley then informs Port Adelaide that West Coast wants his client's services and he wishes to be released from the remainder of his contract at Port Adelaide subject to passing the interview.
Said interview happens, Hinkley passes it, contracts are sorted etc.
Then a media release from Port comes out saying Port and Hinkley are having a mutual parting of ways, "we thank Ken for his time at our Club etc ..." And then within a few hours (1 day at the most) West Coast will formally announced that Hinkley is their new coach.
This is a scenario that allows all parties to get to their desired end points without having to officially sack anyone. And at this point it is a very realistic outcome.
Doesn't have to be sacked necessarily.
If West Coast wants Hinkley (and the noise from this story isn't just coming from Blucher), the most likely scenario will be that Hinkley is informed by West Coast he will get the job provided he goes through a sit down sham interview (a formality). Blucher on behalf of Hinkley then informs Port Adelaide that West Coast wants his client's services and he wishes to be released from the remainder of his contract at Port Adelaide subject to passing the interview.
Said interview happens, Hinkley passes it, contracts are sorted etc.
Then a media release from Port comes out saying Port and Hinkley are having a mutual parting of ways, "we thank Ken for his time at our Club etc ..." And then within a few hours (1 day at the most) West Coast will formally announced that Hinkley is their new coach.
This is a scenario that allows all parties to get to their desired end points without having to officially sack anyone. And at this point it is a very realistic outcome.
Except west coast.Ideal scenario for all
Lock it in Eddie !
Well it's a tough competition and someone has to lose.Except west coast.
I really hope this happens but I just don't think Ken will go west, he needs a job in the AFL some where but I think his coaching days are over.Doesn't have to be sacked necessarily.
If West Coast wants Hinkley (and the noise from this story isn't just coming from Blucher), the most likely scenario will be that Hinkley is informed by West Coast he will get the job provided he goes through a sit down sham interview (a formality). Blucher on behalf of Hinkley then informs Port Adelaide that West Coast wants his client's services and he wishes to be released from the remainder of his contract at Port Adelaide subject to passing the interview.
Said interview happens, Hinkley passes it, contracts are sorted etc.
Then a media release from Port comes out saying Port and Hinkley are having a mutual parting of ways, "we thank Ken for his time at our Club etc ..." And then within a few hours (1 day at the most) West Coast will formally announced that Hinkley is their new coach.
This is a scenario that allows all parties to get to their desired end points without having to officially sack anyone. And at this point it is a very realistic outcome.
The only problem with this scenario is that West Coast are not going to hire Hinkley as their next senior coach.Doesn't have to be sacked necessarily.
If West Coast wants Hinkley (and the noise from this story isn't just coming from Blucher), the most likely scenario will be that Hinkley is informed by West Coast he will get the job provided he goes through a sit down sham interview (a formality). Blucher on behalf of Hinkley then informs Port Adelaide that West Coast wants his client's services and he wishes to be released from the remainder of his contract at Port Adelaide subject to passing the interview.
Said interview happens, Hinkley passes it, contracts are sorted etc.
Then a media release from Port comes out saying Port and Hinkley are having a mutual parting of ways, "we thank Ken for his time at our Club etc ..." And then within a few hours (1 day at the most) West Coast will formally announced that Hinkley is their new coach.
This is a scenario that allows all parties to get to their desired end points without having to officially sack anyone. And at this point it is a very realistic outcome.
The only problem with this scenario is that West Coast are not going to hire Hinkley as their next senior coach.
Nah, maybe "back then" he was useful but he couldn't coach a patty from a cows arse nowadaysI think his greatest strength is getting players to feel good about themselves. He creates an environment where they enjoy coming to 'work' and it motivates performance to a certain level.
The problem is, this is a high performance industry. Other teams are driving higher standards and going to mental places that our team isn't going to. We just turn up and do our best and if we lose then that's fine. That will get you around the mark but you'll never be the best.
I just want him gone, I don't care how.I want the satisfaction of a sacking
We all deserve it after all these years of suffering
Made the AA squad in 2017, 2018, 2020I only recall once, regardless if you think that bloke would be worthy of 4 AA's I'm genuinely shocked.
I just want him gone, I don't care how.
Deep in my secret heart there's the faintest hope that Chewy is just trolling us.
I want the satisfaction of a sacking
We all deserve it after all these years of suffering