Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Spot on. People trying to pillage these teams when we really need these picks almost as much as they need the players.If we get 5 for rioli, take it as that is more than fair, if GC refuse to trade 5, then 12 and 21 is still good value, we're not getting 5 plus anything else for Rioli, comeon. Please let it be 5 so we can nab a second gun mid.
Mid teens for baker please and freo's first 2 picks for Bolton. That is realistic and the best we will get. Add in Brisbanes first pick and we go to the draft with 5 or 6 first rounders.
We can do better. We can say, we want pick 3: make it happen.freo's first 2 picks for Bolton. That is realistic and the best we will get.
If we already have 1, 5 (Rioli), 12 (Baker), 15 (Brisbane), 21, 22 (Graham), we don't really need 10 and 13 for Shai. If Blair's worth his salt he will wheel and deal to get pick 3 involved.Spot on. People trying to pillage these teams when we really need these picks almost as much as they need the players.
**** no.Wonder if Caracalla back with us will increase the likelihood of Hobbs or Tsatas joining us
Would of spent a fair bit of time with them in the VFL program this year
Dunno if I really rate either of them but still worth noting the connection
I don't disagree that trying to get pick 3 instead of the first 2 Freo picks is unreasonable. It's the 5 & 12 for Rioli & all firsts for Bolton which is silly.We can do better. We can say, we want pick 3: make it happen.
If we already have 1, 5 (Rioli), 12 (Baker), 15 (Brisbane), 21, 22 (Graham), we don't really need 10 and 13 for Shai. If Blair's worth his salt he will wheel and deal to get pick 3 involved.
**** no.
I don't disagree that trying to get pick 3 instead of the first 2 Freo picks is unreasonable. It's the 5 & 12 for Rioli & all firsts for Bolton which is silly.
Sounds like Freo don't need us to contribute salary which is fine. I actually think we are better waiting for AFL to bring cap trading in next year and do separate deals with our cap space. Think we will get a better return doing that.
View attachment 2085126
How many Rnd1 draft picks are we going to end up with?
Jed?The reality is, we will accommodate Rioli's request. We aint getting 3 first rounders FFS. Stop this unrealistic shit.
Dont be suprised if a kid is part of the deal, we will ask the question.
Names Draft Lord.We 100% have a list and will ask the question.
Dimma dis say Humphrey is the next Dusty.you also need to look at options such as say bailey humphrey and say pick 20. There are many options
Wonder if Caracalla back with us will increase the likelihood of Hobbs or Tsatas joining us
Would of spent a fair bit of time with them in the VFL program this year
Dunno if I really rate either of them but still worth noting the connection
Time will tell, but with both Rioli and Bolton under still relatively long term deals, it’s up to those clubs to entice us with an offer too good to refuse. We should demand more and see what bites we getIf we get 5 for rioli, take it as that is more than fair, if GC refuse to trade 5, then 12 and 21 is still good value, we're not getting 5 plus anything else for Rioli, comeon. Please let it be 5 so we can nab a second gun mid.
Mid teens for baker please and freo's first 2 picks for Bolton. That is realistic and the best we will get. Add in Brisbanes first pick and we go to the draft with 5 or 6 first rounders.
Can’t kickWhat’s the knock on Tsastas?
Hobbs I really don’t see the point of
What’s the knock on Tsastas?
Hobbs I really don’t see the point of
Ugh forget itCan’t kick
I agree. And you only do a future if it gets you a round better, otherwise you lose a year of development for that player. Could take a round 1 for rioli and a future rd 1 for example, or a future rd 1 for baker, or 2 round 1s and a future rd 1 for Bolton. In fact I think we don't take any future not in the first round.Don't see the point in trying to bank future picks if this draft is so strong.
It would be our pick 21 or 22 (if received for Graham) for F1 for teams thinking they're in the hunt.I agree. And you only do a future if it gets you a round better, otherwise you lose a year of development for that player. Could take a round 1 for rioli and a future rd 1 for example, or a future rd 1 for baker, or 2 round 1s and a future rd 1 for Bolton. In fact I think we don't take any future not in the first round.
With him GC are in the premiership window. What will it cost to bring GC to a premiership window?He is 28 at the start of the season, he is 27 while playing for us.
You also say he has 5 years left like its a fact, do I need to remind you of the great Dusty that apparently had years left in him playing forward and how quickly the end came, or Jack R, who didnt rely on pace.
Rioli relies on pace and its the first thing to go. Expecting 5 years of good footy has significant risk, it isnt a given.
I remember the outcry over paying pick 6 for a much younger A grade mid and you guys expect much much more for Rioli, good grief this is getting uncomfortable.
Prepare to be disappointed peeps.
I think Elijah is pushing this move, from what I hear, not a fan of Brad, Essendon and is a massive Tiger fan. We have expressed interest.
I would hope we aren’t giving a first round pick but he can certainly find it and is a lot more dynamic than what we have.
Not saying I’m in for him, but I can see the appeal.
They don't need good picks anyway they just use their zone and late picks.Sell all their picks for Rioli and they don't make finals might see Dimma out the door.