Search results for query: *

"My mail is...." etc Doesn't sound too concrete. Just connecting the dots that Crouch was supposed to be back with the next week or so and injury list still says 2 weeks.

Apparently Brad Crouch not healing well.

And if it was THAT big the Rush Hour would certainly not be the media source with the world-first exclusive.

Adelaide’s team to take on Collingwood will be named on afc.com.au at 5:55pm (SA time) Wednesday.

Congrats to Charlie Cameron for his elevation to the senior list! Sando has said all year he won't promote a rookie unless they are going to play so he's a red hot chance to debut on Thursday night. http://www.afc.com.au/news/2014-05-13/rookie-earns-elevation

The last qtr in that game ran to about 32 or 33 minutes. So when they walked it was around the 28 minute mark. I'm not sure what they do at the MCG but at Adelaide Oval they show the time-on clock, not the count down clock. Either way, that was the worst Crows performance in about 4 years. When...

A completely impartial decision, and made without a shred of influence from dermott and his merry band of meat heads?

I hope we can at least agree that it'd be a tragedy if the Appeal Board let Viney off simply because of the aimless and brainless furore led by Dermott and yourself over the last few days. Like the AFL tribunal, they are meant to be completely independent and impartial, and to let the bleating...

Well the tribunal and I are right, yes.

Just because the Dees are appealing Viney's ban doesn't mean the appeal judiciary can't increase Viney's penalty. Viney is challenging the tribunal's assessment that he chose to bump Lynch. But like any appellate body, the judiciary handling this matter have 'merits review' power in that they...

Lynch's injuries had nothing to do with the tribunal's assessment that Viney chose to bump so your argument collapses instantly.

Pfft do you know how the MRP/tribunal scale works? Rating the impact as 'medium', as the tribunal did, was ridiculous. The impact should have been rated as 'high', and not even Dermott has disputed that. With that rating, Viney is looking at way more than two games out.

The thing is, if the tribunal agree that Viney bumped Lynch, he is actually facing a 4-5 week penalty if the tribunal rate the impact of the bump correctly. Hugh risk taken by Viney, no doubt spurred on my the sad media beat up.

You are extremely ignorant about this whole issue, no doubt swept up by (a) the fact that it's your player involved and (b) the laughable media whirlwind which has inexplicably selected THIS incident as being worthy of a maelstrom of huff and bluff. The AFL has to be tough on these incidents...

Lol at the outcry from current and former players and coaches. When it comes to head injuries, concussion and brain damage it is not the players we should be consulting but the medical experts who are predicting grave things for our players if their heads and brains are not protected. Of course...

Pretty well everything in Perth is 15% more expensive than Adelaide.

Yep, 2 weeks is about right. "Oh but he braced for impact....."

I thought Viney was tough? Are you suggesting he shirked the contest?

Yep, that's about how long everyone gets to choose between bump and tackle.

Good to see Roos was not allowed to give evidence. Apparently he was going to say how he has specifically taught Viney to brace for impact. What a farce.

I could read that post another 1000 times and it'd still be the pathetic school boy ramblings which drag this website to new depths.

Have you seen the footage or just read this thread?

Then what exactly was the point of your unlettered and vacuous post?

Sorry, I forget the part where I mentioned Douglas in my comment?

I'm suggesting that it is in dispute.

You say that like it's an irrefutable fact.

To those who are saying Viney has no case to answer, it's not 2004. The rules have changed. You are making arguments that might have worked ten years ago, but those arguments are now completely redundant. If the tribunal takes stock of the punishments handed out over the last two years, Viney...

You ****!

If anything it simply goes to show how easy it is to find AFL players who have bulls***ed their supporter base just to keep the media hounds at bay temporarily. It goes both ways though, we have to accept that Danger's comments last week (indicating his loyalty to the Crows) really don't mean...

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-08-07/i-want-to-stay-at-hawthorn-buddy/4871000 http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/sport/afl/brendon-goddard-says-he-will-stay-at-st-kilda/story-e6freck3-1226332084218...