Search results for query: *

It's Charters sense of accomplishment. He got big and we know how, and he transmogrified the Cats too. How he got the Cats that big is a wonderment.

If you got the Cats that big during the glory years (2007 to 2011) with daily input and guidance from Steve Dank, of course you would consider that a "trophy". 2007* 2009* 2011*

OK, you must have a deficiency. Here it is, Dank has serious input into Geelong during 2007 but nobody can tell us whether Geelong did their due diligence and background checks on the architects of the Essendon supplements regime prior to 2007, for which Essendon paid a huge price. Robinson...

While you're at it, can you give us the oil on why Weapon was chatting to Dank on a daily basis during 2007 and gives him credit for having a huge input into the club.

Good point- who actually went over to Deutschland with Rooke to make sure he got the right gear.

Can't you?

Actually Weapon wasn't the main man at Essendon but we can overlook your knowledge on that point. The question stands; why would Weapon, in your words with no authority over supplements, need to be in daily contact with Dank during 2007 at Kardinia Park. 2007 of course being eight years ago and...

How do we know? Weapon told the world. Looks like Weapon expanded his duties into, other areas too. Why else would he be on the phone on a daily basis to a self anointed sports scientist.

What did old Dank get up to at Geelong in 2007 is the relevant bit. Daily contact with Weapon opens up a whole range of scenarios.

You miss the point- Dank was in daily contact with Weapon at Geelong during 2007. The Rooke treatment tells us nothing about what Weapon/Dank got up to in 2007, and what they used. Where are the 2007 records Jack?

It is indeed weird, why would Dank be in daily contact, repeat daily contact with Weapon during 2007 free of charge.

No silly, he was anchored in Sydney tending to his NRL team. Sleepy Hollow is a long way from Sydney so he did his stuff by phone, guiding and giving advice daily to Weapon. No need to be on site when Weapon is getting great results remotely. It's the documents you can't find which are the...

Logistics

Yes he did. 1+1=2. The Weapon spoke to Dank on a daily basis and highly likely to be discussing issues, plans, programs, supplements etc; Dank doesn't need to set foot inside the club to be considered employed. Dank's involvement at Geelong was highly significant during 2007.

So Danky has daily input into the club during 2007 for free. Out of the goodness of his heart. Yep. You Cats really aren't handling these minor allegations very well.

Well you were the first to in the AFL. Daily input smells like an employee to me.

Moon Dog, how could Geelong allow someone with the credentials of Dank, now suspended for life by the AFL, to have daily input into their club during 2007.

The Cats pushing the boundaries, has a certain ring to it.

Of course he wasn't, that's what we say about James.

2007* 2009* 2011*

You're full of shit- Dank has said all he needs to i.e. nothing illegal. You're mob are administratively destitute and you clap your hands. What a freaking joke.

Perfect case and opportunity to excercise their pecuniary powers and they wilted. They're shit scared of any engagement with Dank, and we all know why. That is all.

You've forgotten the other bit- you know, the daily cash register kerching.

Dank has appealed- in case you forgot again.

Let me help you get some perspective because you appear to be losing it, chasing that rainbow. A federal government agency spends a highly publicised 3 years investigating team doping and fails to activate one of it's main enforcement powers against one of the primary targets; as opposed to the...

Get real with your guesses- ASADA has a $5000 pecuniary penalty per day. That is 5000 bucks per day and they don't impose it? You cop a lot less for not lodging a tax return. If you took your blindfold off you'd be asking why they don't want to go near Dank.

You're well past your expiry date lady- try something different; mulesing?

NO- you don't have a link. Let me repeat- you don't have a link.

We appreciate the confirmation.

Look- you've had enough misses as it is. It might be prudent and self respecting to back off and cut your losses. No real point in trying to catch a falling knife.