AFL Player #13: Nik Cox

Remove this Banner Ad

Unicorn training is tough.

I hope he does a bit of work with Draper, Bryan and Goldy this preseason. Showed a bit and I don't think Cox is dumb.
A unicorn is really just a horse with an ornate horn on its head. Surely being a more common, but tough and formidable animal would have been preferable. A gangly and timid creature with the ability to knock itself out does, however, explain why it borders on extinction.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

So he’s not training due to a concussion, is that correct? Look it’s unfortunate but I’m not sure he’s built for AFL. Haven’t seen that same power running he had in his draft year. Unsure what his best position is 4-5 years in now. I think the writing is on the wall unless he really surprises. In any case, he’s just got to be a lock in the VFL and works on his trade in there… like they did with Tsatas.
 
So he’s not training due to a concussion, is that correct? Look it’s unfortunate but I’m not sure he’s built for AFL. Haven’t seen that same power running he had in his draft year. Unsure what his best position is 4-5 years in now. I think the writing is on the wall unless he really surprises. In any case, he’s just got to be a lock in the VFL and works on his trade in there… like they did with Tsatas.
Not doing full contact training. Has been doing the running component. He will not be in the picture for the AFL side in round 1 unless something changes in the next couple of weeks.
 
You'd almost say a certain former list manager should have had the sense to look to trade at least one of those picks out of that draft instead of putting all our eggs in one basket in the most uncertain draft in the modern era
You don’t gotta hand it to dodoro but the talk at the time was about how beneficial it would be to have a bunch of talented draftees coming through together as a group. People were pointing to Melbourne as an example of how this can work really well.


Most of the talk about the quality of the draft was more around how there were a lot of unknowns rather than how shallow it was. I don’t think anyone really expected it to be as poor as it had turned out to be.

Clearly with the benefit of hindsight all of those picks should have been traded out but you can’t reasonably blame the club for that
 
You don’t gotta hand it to dodoro but the talk at the time was about how beneficial it would be to have a bunch of talented draftees coming through together as a group. People were pointing to Melbourne as an example of how this can work really well.


Most of the talk about the quality of the draft was more around how there were a lot of unknowns rather than how shallow it was. I don’t think anyone really expected it to be as poor as it had turned out to be.

Clearly with the benefit of hindsight all of those picks should have been traded out but you can’t reasonably blame the club for that
I get what you're saying, but personally I don't think it's a captain hindsight call to say that it was a major risk to use three top ten picks in a draft with that amount of unknowns. I think it would have been a relatively obvious prudent decision to trade out one of those picks into the next year.
 
You don’t gotta hand it to dodoro but the talk at the time was about how beneficial it would be to have a bunch of talented draftees coming through together as a group. People were pointing to Melbourne as an example of how this can work really well.


Most of the talk about the quality of the draft was more around how there were a lot of unknowns rather than how shallow it was. I don’t think anyone really expected it to be as poor as it had turned out to be.

Clearly with the benefit of hindsight all of those picks should have been traded out but you can’t reasonably blame the club for that
Smells of Dodoro bargain fever though. You go over the history of when we have had "top" picks and it all seems to line up with junk drafts, and vice versa.

Doesn't take Einsteen to suspect that the reason teams traded picks rather than players or didn't want to get involved as a 3rd party is because it was widely perceived within the industry that the picks weren't as great as "top 10" would suggest.
 
Smells of Dodoro bargain fever though. You go over the history of when we have had "top" picks and it all seems to line up with junk drafts, and vice versa.

Doesn't take Einsteen to suspect that the reason teams traded picks rather than players or didn't want to get involved as a 3rd party is because it was widely perceived within the industry that the picks weren't as great as "top 10" would suggest.
I agree with Old Campaigner that there wasn't really a suggestion it was a shallow draft - more that it was so much less certain than any other draft year in the modern era, so the idea of using 3 top 10 picks was a major risk. But given Dodo's lack of self-awareness and over-inflated (and inexplicable) self-confidence I'm sure he thought he could pick the eyes out of it like he'd done in the first round of the previous 20 drafts...
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

I agree with Old Campaigner that there wasn't really a suggestion it was a shallow draft - more that it was so much less certain than any other draft year in the modern era, so the idea of using 3 top 10 picks was a major risk. But given Dodo's lack of self-awareness and over-inflated (and inexplicable) self-confidence I'm sure he thought he could pick the eyes out of it like he'd done in the first round of the previous 20 drafts...
The flip side to that is 2020 was the year we unambiguously went into rebuild mode and taking a bunch of high picks was seen as a great way to kick it off and bring in a core group to build around. My recollection is that the risks around the draft were acknowledged but were offset against the opportunity 3x top 10 picks presented.

The knowledge of people posting from the cheap seats on big footy is certainly not perfect but there weren’t many (possibly any) complaints at the time with the chosen course.
 
The flip side to that is 2020 was the year we unambiguously went into rebuild mode and taking a bunch of high picks was seen as a great way to kick it off and bring in a core group to build around. My recollection is that the risks around the draft were acknowledged but were offset against the opportunity 3x top 10 picks presented.

The knowledge of people posting from the cheap seats on big footy is certainly not perfect but there weren’t many (possibly any) complaints at the time with the chosen course.
I get what you're saying but not being behind the BF consensus isn't a pass mark for a club/list boss
 
It works both ways.

If there was a general feeling from recruiters that the 2020 draft was a bad place to be then Dodoro would have had a hard time trading out the picks for anything of value in future drafts. Considering how bad we were and who we lost in 2020, there would have been rioting if he had traded out three top ten picks for three picks possibly in the teens in 2021.

Nobody ever knows in advance how strong a draft crop will be so even though the draft order in 2020 was more uncertain than normal, there wouldn't have been any expectation that the overall talent was as bad as it turned out to be. If the overall talent pool had been as strong as normal, three top ten picks should have been sufficient to garner two decent players at least.
 
I get what you're saying but not being behind the BF consensus isn't a pass mark for a club/list boss
I know, hence why I was at pains to point out it is imperfect.

What I’m getting at is there wasn’t any widely held belief within clubland or more broadly that it was a poor draft that clubs would be better off trading out of. The pick trading that year doesn’t seem to indicate clubs were placing excessive value on future picks either. It’s very easy to look at four seasons of football and say now it was crap but decision makers at the time didn’t have the benefit of that hindsight.

It would be different if we’d traded in a bunch of 2020 first round picks rival clubs were dumping - that would indicate they knew something we didn’t and should raise questions
 
I know, hence why I was at pains to point out it is imperfect.

What I’m getting at is there wasn’t any widely held belief within clubland or more broadly that it was a poor draft that clubs would be better off trading out of. The pick trading that year doesn’t seem to indicate clubs were placing excessive value on future picks either. It’s very easy to look at four seasons of football and say now it was crap but decision makers at the time didn’t have the benefit of that hindsight.

It would be different if we’d traded in a bunch of 2020 first round picks rival clubs were dumping - that would indicate they knew something we didn’t and should raise questions
Yeah I agree for the most part. I do think that situation was a little different to most though in that it's not pure hindsight of the draft, there was clear information to everyone that that draft was particularly speculative (hence other clubs likely not coming at us with strong offers to get into the upper ranks of draft picks).

I guess I just have the expectation that those in charge of the club I support will make savvy decisions - popular with the fans or not - that are ahead of the general views or knowledge of the average punter. I think/hope we're starting to see that with Rosa/Vozzo; many fans criticised moves they made to trade up for Caddy and trade out of the first round last year ahead of drafting Kako. Those decisions show foresight and strategic thinking, and while only time will tell if they were wise, they're certainly a departure from the approach for the past 20 years.
 
On Cox I think an extended spell in the VFL might do him some good and help build some confidence. If that doesn’t work then his papers may be stamped
Yeah, I really want to see if he can dominate a VFL game. In the past it seems like he shower glimpses and then went straight back into the 1s. What does a dominant game from Cox in the VFL look like? I actually have no idea!?
 
lol

the 3 top 10 pick 2020 draft is turning into a real disaster isn't it.
No one could have predicted the Reid issues. Personally I think that we brought part of it on ourselves by pushing him too early.

Cox was always a bit of a speculative pick. I liked him based on how he played as a defender but the lesson for me was the sample size was too small due to Covid. Maybe if we did not rush him onto a wing and we took our time with him things may have been different but his issue is he is not big on body contact after sides started to put physical pressure on him in his first year after a good start. He looks like a bust. At best a 200cm flanker.

Perkins I am going to post about in his thread.

It does look like 2020 will go down as an average to poor draft.
 
Just doesn't look to have the body to stand up to the AFL rigours unfortunately, not sure if he has it mentally either.

Bust, but move on.
 
Just doesn't look to have the body to stand up to the AFL rigours unfortunately, not sure if he has it mentally either.

Bust, but move on.

A full year in VFL to build up his body and at least show some sense of playing with physical contact should be his lot this year. Hasn’t put on any size or grown any balls in four years so I think he’s closer to delisting over playing again. A classic Essendon list clogger.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

AFL Player #13: Nik Cox


Write your reply...

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top