Jellay17
Debutant
- Jul 31, 2009
- 61
- 2
- AFL Club
- Essendon
- Other Teams
- Carolina Panthers, Dallas Mavericks
Re: Round 21 Trades
I would go with A aswell. Team would still score well without Pav and Sandilands.
Need to trade Goodwin out. My backline consists of: Goddard, Hodge, Enright, Gilbee, Malceski, Gilbert, Goodwin. I can afford anyone except for Milburn. AND i want to steer clear of Lake due to his injury and chance he may be a late withdrawal.
I'm thinking of Broughton, Newman, Duffield, Kelly.
I'd hang on to Pav and play Watts. That trade could really come in handy in the GF. GL!
Now can anyone shed some light on my situation?
I've finished weekly top 500 last 2 weeks in row. I'm in a super competitive league among friends, but I feel I have a slight edge on my opponent.
2 trades left. 60k in the bank.
Which option would you do?? I'm leaning towards A.
A) No trades. You have sufficient backup in Trengove, and Waters/Stanton both have favourable matchups this week. Look to upgrade next week.
B) Waters>Keplar, then swap Trengove with Keplar. Strijk into B7.
C) Waters>Keplar, Stanton>NDS/Murphy/Bartel
D) Waters>Malceski, Stanton>NDS
E) Sandi>Mumford, Waters>Malceski/Fisher
F) Sandi>Mumford, Stanton>NDS/Murphy/Bartel
I would go with A aswell. Team would still score well without Pav and Sandilands.
Need to trade Goodwin out. My backline consists of: Goddard, Hodge, Enright, Gilbee, Malceski, Gilbert, Goodwin. I can afford anyone except for Milburn. AND i want to steer clear of Lake due to his injury and chance he may be a late withdrawal.
I'm thinking of Broughton, Newman, Duffield, Kelly.