Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No thanks to either
We'll just keep pick 1 and take another champion in Boyd thank you
Gold Coast are 17th for hit outs Swans are 2nd behind West Coast Mummy must be doing something right
That is like saying Steve Smith is better than Michael ClarkI'd take Dixon and Nicholls ahead of Mumford everyday of the week.
What's your point? Nicholls is already a fantastic tap ruckman and Dixon has truckloads of potential. Mumford is not needed on the Gold Coast.Mumford was fantastic again today. The big fella has the runs on the board Nicholls and Dixon haven't
A lot of players show potential I never said Gold Coast should get him I said he would be their first ruck!What's your point? Nicholls is already a fantastic tap ruckman and Dixon has truckloads of potential. Mumford is not needed on the Gold Coast.
Your ruckman got 'pantsed' again!Dunno bout that
That is like saying Steve Smith is better than Michael Clark
Mummy was great again today surely you can admit that!It is nothing of the sort.
He wouldn't be that, Nicholls would be.A lot of players show potential I never said Gold Coast should get him I said he would be their first ruck!
If Nicholls is so good why are GC 17th for hit outs and Swans are 2nd is that a ruck mans main job? Probably not at Stkilda as you copped another hiding in the ruckHe wouldn't be that, Nicholls would be.
Nicholls hasn't played every game lol. When he does play he is a quality tap ruckman.If Nicholls is so good why are GC 17th for hit outs and Swans are 2nd is that a ruck mans main job?
Lol as good as Mcevoy?Nicholls hasn't played every game lol. When he does play he is a quality tap ruckman.
Completely relevantLol as good as Mcevoy?
So you don't rate big Mummy at all?Completely relevant
No it's not. Not even close. Unless you think Mumford is one of the great players of the modern era, which judging by your recent posting is quite possible. Dixon and Nicholls are elite prospects (unlike Smith) and Mumford is a solid, important player (Clarke is much more).That is like saying Steve Smith is better than Michael Clark
What do you think Mumford is worth in your eyes then?No it's not. Not even close. Unless you think Mumford is one of the great players of the modern era, which judging by your recent posting is quite possible. Dixon and Nicholls are elite prospects (unlike Smith) and Mumford is a solid, important player (Clarke is much more).
I reckon around pick 30 is about right. He's a quality player but only has maybe 4 or 5 years left and could slow down before then, isn't immune to injuries or a suspension either. But heck, we paid pick 14 for Trav Johnstone! Judging by that super recruiting decision the Giants may just give you pick 1 for himWhat do you think Mumford is worth in your eyes then?
Completely relevant
As clueless as your football club! What a rabble lolJust ignore him Rahul he is quite literally one of the most clueless posters on this entire site and even having him in a thread dumbs it down to unbelievable levels.
We got pick 14 & 46 or something around that for Jolly so I'd like it to be better than 30 personallyI reckon around pick 30 is about right. He's a quality player but only has maybe 4 or 5 years left and could slow down before then, isn't immune to injuries or a suspension either. But heck, we paid pick 14 for Trav Johnstone! Judging by that super recruiting decision the Giants may just give you pick 1 for him
As clueless as your football club! What a rabble lol
I'm dobbing on youYou truly are a child aren't you. Im done I'm just going to report your posts from now on.