- Banned
- #1,676
On what basis though?
Just a hunch. Fyfe menioned he was mentoring him last season and he was IMO Peels best Freo player last season. Freo may have someone in mind, I'm just speculating.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
On what basis though?
I'd have to agree. Judging by the Peel game reports Ballard was consistent and productive in practically every match.Just a hunch. Fyfe menioned he was mentoring him last season and he was IMO Peels best Freo player last season. Freo may have someone in mind, I'm just speculating.
He looks in ace condition and I see he finished well up in the run today.
Missed a lot of the last pre season with a broken hand and with hopefully a full pre will be pushing hard for an upgradeers.
Ballard has the perfect big body and tank of the modern midfielder
Sutcliffe was my last pick as a future champ ,this guy is my pick to be the best of last seasons draft
This is a reason why I like Wright. While most descriptions raise concerns over his one-on-one contested marking given his size, he generally seems to be described as good on the lead, agile and good below the knees for a KPF. Kind of a different beast to Apeness who, when I have seen him, has looked far more comfortable in a one-on-one contest.
Just a hunch. Fyfe menioned he was mentoring him last season and he was IMO Peels best Freo player last season. Freo may have someone in mind, I'm just speculating.
He looks in ace condition and I see he finished well up in the run today.
Missed a lot of the last pre season with a broken hand and with hopefully a full pre will be pushing hard for an upgrade
Ballard has the perfect big body and tank of the modern midfielder
Sutcliffe was my last pick as a future champ ,this guy is my pick to be the best of last seasons draft
The biggest thing he has going for him is his buddy here on BF - helps working with a buddy with an established track record with the young guns
The biggest thing he has going for him is his buddy here on BF - helps working with a buddy with an established track record with the young guns
Talk that Kyle Langford is a chance at 5 for Collingwood. That would cause a mini landslide down the order. I wonder if we have our mind on someone in particular or if we are waiting for the best player to slip?
So we have our mind set on someone who is going to slipBoth.
So we have our mind set on someone who is going to slip
Talk that Kyle Langford is a chance at 5 for Collingwood. That would cause a mini landslide down the order. I wonder if we have our mind on someone in particular or if we are waiting for the best player to slip?
I think Langford will be something pretty special, would be brilliant if he fell through to us. He'll need to bulk up & require some development but all the right ingredients are there.
Langford was rated the second best kick in the draftHis kicking skills are a bit iffy though. I really want us to start placing a higher value on kicking skills. Other than that Langford does have a lot of talent. But he has to be able to execute it.
Reckon all the hype re: Durdin will almost certainly put him out of our reach.
Given I'm fairly certain the rookie elevation date was Oct 31 I'd say no.I still can't make my mind up as to if Freo will promote Ballard with their last pick of the ND. This draft will be interesting as Freo at times have found some late pick gems.
Nah that's not the reason. Hagdorn said we were looking at him. Hopefully both cancel each other out.I'm calling it - we'll overlook Durdin. We never pick the person the Freo board talks about most with our 1st rounder.
aint Collingwood picking up Moore with their first pick??? father -son thingyTalk that Kyle Langford is a chance at 5 for Collingwood. That would cause a mini landslide down the order. I wonder if we have our mind on someone in particular or if we are waiting for the best player to slip?