If you agree that they would still win without those KPP players, then by extension you are agreeing with the assertion that their midfield/flankers are where their true strength lies.
Have you ever considered doing stand-up comedy Geoff ???
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
If you agree that they would still win without those KPP players, then by extension you are agreeing with the assertion that their midfield/flankers are where their true strength lies.
Not at all. This is a ridiculous argument... You said comfortably win to which I DISAGREE.... Our list is also the worst in the AFL at the moment and the Hawks have the best. They are a well rounded all-star side and you, quite frankly, should be committed!If you agree that they would still win without those KPP players, then by extension you are agreeing with the assertion that their midfield/flankers are where their true strength lies.
One year can mean a lot for some of these kids.
I think he's made some very good points today.Have you ever considered doing stand-up comedy Geoff ???
Not at all. This is a ridiculous argument... You said comfortably win to which I DISAGREE.... Our list is also the worst in the AFL at the moment and the Hawks have the best. They are a well rounded all-star side and you, quite frankly, should be committed!
Just to summarize:
If hawthorn have our midfield/flankers but their KPP they lose
If hawthorn have our KPP but their midfield/flankers, they win
My point is that their midfield/flankers is their greatest strength.
Totally totally agree.Just to summarize:
If hawthorn have our midfield/flankers but their KPP they lose
If hawthorn have our KPP but their midfield/flankers, they win
My point is that their midfield/flankers is their greatest strength.
Here's a novel thought, how about we aim to have both (really good midfield/flankers & KPP) ???
Just to summarize:
If hawthorn have our midfield/flankers but their KPP they lose
If hawthorn have our KPP but their midfield/flankers, they win
My point is that their midfield/flankers is their greatest strength.
You pick some hard battles Geoff, what is the point of this argument? Sounds like an argument for arguments sake. Personally I hope we get a forward with 8 and then 2 mids
Weitering
Weideman / Burton /Curnow
Oliver
Gresham
Of course. My initial point is that ideally I would like to see (depending on quality) 1 forward, 1 defender, 3 goal kicking mid types from the national draft.Here's a novel thought, how about we aim to have both (really good midfield/flankers & KPP) ???
Of coarse. My initial point is that ideally I would like to see (depending on quality) 1 forward, 1 defender, 3 goal kicking mid types from the national draft.
I have a bit of faith from the brief highlights that I have seen, that silvagni may be that forward.
If we are confident that we can develop silvagni into a gunston type, then we can look at trading in another ready to go forward (Tomlinson) in a year or two, and potentially have a midfield/flank/wings that can boast as many quality contributors as any other side
If we manage to get Tomlinson next year, our best 22 could look like this in 2017
Buckley Weitering Tuohy
Docherty Rowe Plowman
Kerridge Cripps Boekhorst
Kreuzer Murphy Oliver
Hibberd Tomlinson Gibbs
Summer Silvagni Gresham
Graham, Byrne, Thomas, Jaksch
Provided BB can get guys like Buckley, Sumner and Jaksch up to a good standard, that is beginning to look like a decent amount of contributors
Plus silvagni I am assumingSo
1. Weitering
8. Oliver
11. Gresham
19. hibberd
???
Someone tell me this ain't so please?Jack Silvagni should come with no additional pressure other than his surname.. lets be honest, he is a key forward who if he didnt have the last name Silvagni probably would not have been drafted at all, and certainly not rated in the top 30 players in the draft.
He is very much a work in progress development player that is long odds to make it at AFL level.
Someone tell me this ain't so please?
Someone tell me this ain't so please?
Jack Silvagni should come with no additional pressure other than his surname.. lets be honest, he is a key forward who if he didnt have the last name Silvagni probably would not have been drafted at all, and certainly not rated in the top 30 players in the draft.
He is very much a work in progress development player that is long odds to make it at AFL level.
Of all the top prospects Harry is the one I want the least, which is why I'm sure we'll take him at 8. Probably ahead of someone like Francis or Parish just to piss me off.
jack's a dud Thy! Didn't you hear the news? Lol
Not sure why he nominated this year TBH.
Barely played any junior footy..............and he'll always end up at our lot under F/S.
What's another year playing juniors???