I too am shocked by the lack of Pinskier. Did we ever find out if he was a real bloke or were we Catfished?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
How many big footy regulars have voting rights for the AGM? For Brisbane based members only premium members automatically get AGM voting rights while prime and standard members must pay for the September Member add on to get voting rights.
All Melbourne members automatically get AGM voting rights so Melbourne members proxy votes will more than likely determine the outcome of the board election.
Great - should I look out for a guy who looks like Dimebag Darrell?Myself and going by the discussion surrounding all the turmoil last year, quite a few others on this board.
How many big footy regulars have voting rights for the AGM? For Brisbane based members only premium members automatically get AGM voting rights while prime and standard members must pay for the September Member add on to get voting rights.
All Melbourne members automatically get AGM voting rights so Melbourne members proxy votes will more than likely determine the outcome of the board election.
With only 1 vote per member I think joint tickets may not be that important.Do not know, but would have thought Lethal & Power will run a joint ticket, perhaps with a few other incumbents. Will be interesting to see how it plays out.
Wasn't Thornton put forward as part of Leigh's ticket when pushing to get on the board? Might be difficult for Kliemt if that's still the case.
Don't disagree but I was talking more from the point of view that Thornton will have the support of the incumbents, one of whom, Matthews, has considerable sway when it comes to influencing opinion. I think the fact that Thornton played with Fitzroy will be a factor, but a secondary one.Perhaps. I'd like to think people will think beyond starry-eyed "ooh he played for the club" kinda thinking in deciding on a board candidate. For example, I found Laurie Serafini to be thoroughly unimpressive when I discussed some issues with him, and more than a little cocky and arrogant - his default position was to throw his weight around rather than engage.
Thornton to be fair does have some good business success to his name with McDonalds franchises IIRC, but other candidates might offer a point of difference in areas where the board is deficient.
Will be keeping an open, objective mind.
Don't disagree but I was talking more from the point of view that Thornton will have the support of the incumbents, one of whom, Matthews, has considerable sway when it comes to influencing opinion. I think the fact that Thornton played with Fitzroy will be a factor, but a secondary one.
With only 1 vote per member I think joint tickets may not be that important.
If that's the case I apologiseSorry? There's 5 spots and members have a right to vote for each position. I may have misunderstood what you mean by the above, but I would have thought each member has a say on the make up of the board, not one spot on the board. In which case, I would have thought the ballot form will look like this:
motion for the re-election of Lethal yes/no/abstain
motion for the re-election of Power yes/no/abstain
motion for the re-election of Andrews yes/no/abstain
motion for the re-election of McGregor yes/no/abstain
motion for the election of Thornton yes/no/abstain
motion for the election of Raleigh yes/no/abstain
motion for the election of Kliemt yes/no/abstain
with a note that in the event that there are more elected directors than spots, those with the most 'for' votes get the gig.
If I'm right with the above, then it's similar to last year's EGM requisition, with Lethal holding the ace of 'vote for my team'.
Sorry? There's 5 spots and members have a right to vote for each position. I may have misunderstood what you mean by the above, but I would have thought each member has a say on the make up of the board, not one spot on the board. In which case, I would have thought the ballot form will look like this:
motion for the re-election of Lethal yes/no/abstain
motion for the re-election of Power yes/no/abstain
motion for the re-election of Andrews yes/no/abstain
motion for the re-election of McGregor yes/no/abstain
motion for the election of Thornton yes/no/abstain
motion for the election of Raleigh yes/no/abstain
motion for the election of Kliemt yes/no/abstain
with a note that in the event that there are more elected directors than spots, those with the most 'for' votes get the gig.
If I'm right with the above, then it's similar to last year's EGM requisition, with Lethal holding the ace of 'vote for my team'.
This is all above my head (which is a bit embarrassing as a formerPolitical Science grad).
How would this work if certain candidates run as a joint ticket?
Got dirt on the others?Just received notice that Julie Greenwood and Phillip Di Bella have also nominated for a board position.
You may remember Di Bella by the following:
http://m.brisbanetimes.com.au/queen...rd-but-newman-stays-quiet-20140625-zsltt.html
Let the mud slinging begin, hey?Just received notice that Julie Greenwood and Phillip Di Bella have also nominated for a board position.
You may remember Di Bella by the following:
http://m.brisbanetimes.com.au/queen...rd-but-newman-stays-quiet-20140625-zsltt.html
I agree with you 100%, my intention is definitely to run a positive campaign. I just couldn't help myself and had to include reference to this recent article. Apologies, won't happen againLet the mud slinging begin, hey?
Would much prefer if each candidate just focused on their own candidacy, to be honest. I don't think our club needs to get dragged through a nasty campaign.
Wasn't Thornton put forward as part of Leigh's ticket when pushing to get on the board? Might be difficult for Kliemt if that's still the case.