We gave BJ to the Dons and they gave up nothing.. Surely the can do the same for Carlise? We were nice, now it's their turn... ha ha!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Mathieson and Pearce vs Carlisle and an Ah Chee/Gresham/Milera ?Here's a question for you all...
Carlisle, and pick 5 gone (to the Injectors or elswhere doesn't overly matter), or;
Pearce and keep it?
Problem with harking back to two seasons ago is that Carlisle may never recapture that form. We all wired for Kosi to get back to 2005 form. Never happened. Corey McKenna was terrific for a couple of seasons then lost all form never to return.
Because he was good in 2013 doesn't mean he will be any good three years later.
Problem with harking back to two seasons ago is that Carlisle may never recapture that form. We all wired for Kosi to get back to 2005 form. Never happened. Corey McKenna was terrific for a couple of seasons then lost all form never to return.
Because he was good in 2013 doesn't mean he will be any good three years later.
Or Laverde and Carlisle for pick 5Here's a question for you all...
Carlisle, and pick 5 gone (to the Injectors or elswhere doesn't overly matter), or;
Pearce and keep it?
Delaney unfortunately is decent back up but not up to it.
I think it's unfair that you make a comment like "he's not the messiah", again I don't think anyone said he was this.
I think anyone who saw him play footy in his 2nd and 3rd year would agree that he was showing the type of potential to become a very strong key defender as he developed.
He development has somewhat stagnated. He's been caught up in a terrible situation and due to a lack of forwards and an influx of defenders, has been thrown around a lot.
He is a clear, clear upgrade on Delaney (who couldn't get a game toward the back end of the year) and someone we can rely on for 6-7 year.
He's a good player as we sit. He has the potential to be very good. He fits a need for our team moving forward. He fits our list profile.
Or Laverde and Carlisle for pick 5
Doubt bombers would do but anyone intrested .
Laverede was in trout top 10
Ah Chee, Gresham, Milera and Pearce are all indigenous. Would be great to get one of them IMO.
Mathieson and Pearce vs Carlisle and an Ah Chee/Gresham/Milera ?
Toss a coin.
Sometimes past form does count.Problem with harking back to two seasons ago is that Carlisle may never recapture that form.
Taking all of that as read. Why do you think we would have to give up a good pick to Essendon to get him. The Questions are "who else wants him?","where does he want to go?" and "what would other clubs give up to get him?" .
Essendon have very little leverage in the whole situation.
StKilda did not want to trade our former first round pick for a second rounder when he went to the Eagles. What you want is not what you get.
Where would you rate Frawley and Lake in that same criteria? I wouldn't of thought they would individually do better than Carlisle on your comparisons.
Footy is more than just the individual now. Freo is exactly case in point, the collective is greater than the individual.
Carlisle make us better, no doubt. Give Hugh 2 years and he seems like he will take the bigger bodied Fwds, combined with Carlisle, Roberton and Webster and that seems like a pretty solid backline core, not forgetting Gilbert, which a lot of us do, it's a backline capable of as much as we had in 2009/10j
Three years ago I played coastal U19's footy against Alex, who as you said was playing for Ulverstone. He played CHF and absolutely tore us to shreds, can confirm that he's a super athletic beanpole. No idea why he was only playing 19's, pretty sure the next week he was in the 1's and we didn't have to play against him again, thank god..On Pearce, according to Fremantle's draft bio he was an elite cricketer and only played local footy in Tassie for Ulverstone ahead of his drafting.
Apparently no key position player ever tested better for endurance at the combine considering he recorded a 15.5 beep test and a 10.06 3km time trial. He also apparently ran on average 13.8km a game for Ulverstone, having grown a whopping 10cm in 2012.
Me too. Just happens to be a few indigenous players around the mark again. Even Kieran Lovell, Aidyn Johnson, Yestin Eades or Daniel Rioli might be in consideration.I just want good footballers, don't care what color their skin is. ( am i doing it wrong )?
Me too. Just happens to be a few indigenous players around the mark again. Even Kieran Lovell, Aidyn Johnson, Yestin Eades or Daniel Rioli might be in consideration.
Some would argue they invented the game. I'd just like to be sure we're not shy after the Lovett disaster.
Here's the thing though. We're in a position where we're going to have a mountain of cap space free for next season so we could front-end a chunk of Carlisle's contract so that it doesn't take up $700K worth of our cap in each of those following years.No doubt he will make us better, but having $700k extra to throw at a Shiel or O'Meara in coming years excites me a lot more.
Freeman is such a Port Adelaide (style) of player. He can win the contested footy and uses it reasonably efficiently. But his running is for an inside player outstanding. He has an elite pace and endurance combination. I still see him as a variation on Luke Shuey. Shuey I feel will be the slightly more dominant contested ball winner, Freeman the more explosive and better runner with better decision making ability. But in terms of career projection. That's what I'm still anticipating. It is also thought that Freeman still has his running ability. So he is such a Port Adelaide (style) fit because he does those things needed but so perfectly fits the clubs style of game as he will accelerate and take on the game with ball in hand.
Have Port shown any interest in him?Knightmare's comment about Freeman on his thread on the D&T board:
Probably doesn't matter since he's nominated us. Would have to go back and re-read his thread to get that answer though.Have Port shown any interest in him?
I don't think anyone denies that Carlisle is a good player and the picks we give up or suggest isn't neccessarily an indication of how we rate him. The size of the contract in front of him is more of an indication of how much we rate him and lucky for us - the two aren't linked.
If, and a big if, he nominates us - just about everything is going against the Bombers in a trade sense.
Look at Bruce as an example, Giants knew he had potential as a former zone selection and U18AA - knew of his potential worth too. They asked for a first rounder, we weren't even prepared to give our second rounder for him. Why? He was OOC, nominated us and we played a better game.
I'm not suggesting Carlisle is worth a pick in the 40s, but when you weigh it all up - what the Bombers want or what is fair means very little. Especially when the top 8 or 9 players this year have genuine star qualities - as good as or better than other years.