We'll sort of. He doesn't have a pet but he signed up some pet cemetery membersLet me guess....his 2 game pet membership came through?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
We'll sort of. He doesn't have a pet but he signed up some pet cemetery membersLet me guess....his 2 game pet membership came through?
We'll sort of. He doesn't have a pet but he signed up some pet cemetery members
Good question but maybe the better question is how many members joined because we are more likely to win games and then of the wins how much are they because of paddy? I didn't join because of Paddy but I certainly going to more games because of him.What % of the 50,000 do we attribute to the "Dangerfield effect"?
It certainly is.It's a bloody amazing statistic, considering the ground only holds half that number
What a lovely video, and so good to see the club recognise some long-loyal members like Vic and Bev.Harry, Danger, Hawk, Duncan, Blitz and Scotty visited a couple who've been members for 50 years to celebrate the 50k membership mark.
Adorable video: http://www.geelongcats.com.au/news/2016-04-27/cats-surpass-50000-members
I've banged on about the lack of atmosphere at Simonds, but one thing we have is a genuine community history. This is something to be truly proud of. The reality is no AFL club comes near Geelong in terms of local history and roots in the community. We are Geelong!!What a lovely video, and so good to see the club recognise some long-loyal members like Vic and Bev.
Even if it's just a PR stunt, seeing that makes me feel good about the club. I hope they continue to recognise the importance of the local community and fans, and retain those solid links within Geelong.
All that post was true.Being extremely classy on and off the field is where we need to be heading and Reeves strikes me so far as a key figure in taking the club to a whole new level in its standard of 'delivery' to members.
Long may it last.
10% re overall recruiting?What % of the 50,000 do we attribute to the "Dangerfield effect"?
Also, I think it was great that a couple of long serving members were recognised.
What a nice touch. Kudos to the club for that...
And here I was, leaving the front door open in the snow...oh well....
All that post was true.
But gee, if we haven't been the "bolded" for the last decade, then no one has.
Our club is respected for its class, and long may it continue.
Mmmm....yeah......Whether we like it or not, other clubs have been demonstrably better than us in some important areas (like member development) over recent times. Through a season of unprecedented success for the GFC, our membership numbers have actually been solid but unspectacular. At the same time, other far less successful clubs on the AFL ladder have continued to steadily increase membership numbers year after year.
I would suggest that we haven't actually been all that classy in areas like member attraction and engagement over the last ten years. There would be plenty of members (me included) who would note that their love for the club has kept them renewing their membership each year rather than a sense that the club truly values and appreciates the commitment its members make.
I think this is also now changing for the better and will be another aspect of the club enhacing its reputation as a leader amongst AFL clubs in how you get it done on the ground and behind the scenes.
Mmmm....yeah......
I think you are misusing the word "class".
class•y
(ˈklæs i, ˈklɑ si)
adj. class•i•er, class•i•est.
Informal. of high quality, rank, or grade; stylish.
I simply believe that our efforts over the years in member attraction and engagement have not been of the highest quality. According to the definition above, that fits OK, as far as I can see.